I guess I made a wise decision when I said ..
Originally posted by Philosophía
I'm done with this. I'm not about to get involved in this discussion with every Thor fan who comes to this thread and tries to make excuses.
Now, to move on ..
Originally posted by Avlon
If it's true that heat weakens Red Hulk, I'm sure the heat of re entry to the earth would certainly have some effect on him.Just food for thought.
One thing is for sure though, even if Superman wouldn't be able to put him down physically (which I doubt), he would dance around him until he would get mad enough for Superman to be able to one-shot him. (A shame that Rulk vs Superman thread got closed 😏)
Originally posted by quanchi112
Ok, thats fine. Its 1-1 with Thor clearly being more powerful and clearly having better feats.
1) Thor has shown himself 'clearly' to be more powerful by
a) getting beaten by Rulk and even losing control of Mjolnir
or
b) launching a surprise attack cheap shot against Rulk while Rulk wasn't even aware Thor was around and in the midst of fighting Green Hulk
If you get from those two events that Thor is clearly more powerful, then good for you.
2) In regards to the feats. Thor has been around for decades. Rulk has been around for about 6 issues. Rulk has already done more in 6 issues than most top tiers do in several years. But if you think it means something when a character who's been around for several decades has more impressive feats than a character who's been around for 6 issues, then that's your perogative.
Originally posted by jalek moyeit does matter if someone starts a fight with a cheapshot.
can those even be considered seperate fights, there ius a very short pause in between them. And almost all fights start with someone getting hit while unprepared it doesnt make it any different its just ussally how someone gets the first hit
If Daredevil was fighting Bullseye, and without warning Captain America throws his shield fullforce at Daredevil and then Cap proceeds to beat up DD, would you use that as an example of Cap being superior to DD or would you say that it was an unfair advantage for cap?
Originally posted by Starscream MUhm are you suggesting that Rulk is more powerful?
1) Thor has shown himself 'clearly' to be more powerful bya) getting beaten by Rulk and even losing control of Mjolnir
or
b) launching a surprise attack cheap shot against Rulk while Rulk wasn't even aware Thor was around and in the midst of fighting Green Hulk
If you get from those two events that Thor is clearly more powerful, then good for you.
2) In regards to the feats. Thor has been around for decades. Rulk has been around for about 6 issues. Rulk has already done more in 6 issues than most top tiers do in several years. But if you think it means something when a character who's been around for several decades has more impressive feats than a character who's been around for 6 issues, then that's your perogative.
I am not looking at these fights as the end all be all examples of Thor. You clearly have tunnel vision here and are completely ignoring the godblast.
Rulk also got beat by Thor in their second fight. Wow,Rulk is only a top tier now. Face the music. I thought he was above top tier but come to find out he isnt. Not at all. Thor has better feats and is 1-1 vs Rulk in his initial appearances. Without taking Thor's hammer Rulk has never beaten him also.
Originally posted by quanchi112ummm I NEVER said Rulk is more powerful. Unlike you, I'm not trying to extrapolate things beyond whats on the page. Thor may be more powerful or not, its not exactly clear. Both of them seem pretty equal in power.
Uhm are you suggesting that Rulk is more powerful?I am not looking at these fights as the end all be all examples of Thor. You clearly have tunnel vision here and are completely ignoring the godblast.
Rulk also got beat by Thor in their second fight. Wow,Rulk is only a top tier now. Face the music. I thought he was above top tier but come to find out he isnt. Not at all. Thor has better feats and is 1-1 vs Rulk in his initial appearances. Without taking Thor's hammer Rulk has never beaten him also.
Originally posted by Starscream MThor is clearly more powerful. Thats the point and the only reason Rulk defeated Thor is because of the power of his warhammer. Its crystal clear. You seem to be very ignorant of Thor and his feats.
ummm I NEVER said Rulk is more powerful. Unlike you, I'm not trying to extrapolate things beyond whats on the page. Thor may be more powerful or not, its not exactly clear. Both of them seem pretty equal in power.
Originally posted by Philosophía
I guess I made a wise decision when I said ..Now, to move on ..
One thing is for sure though, even if Superman wouldn't be able to put him down physically (which I doubt), he would dance around him until he would get mad enough for Superman to be able to one-shot him. (A shame that Rulk vs Superman thread got closed 😏)
If heat is truly a weakness for him, he's going to have problems with a LOT of top tiers. HV, Cosmic bolts, etc.
Maybe Rulk is Martian Manhunter in disguise! 😱
Originally posted by Starscream M😂 I see you are still basing this off the one win Rulk has over Thor by using his very own hammer.
yep, and he demonstrated this bya) getting beaten by Rulk and even losing control of Mjolnir
and
b) launching a surprise attack cheap shot against Rulk while Rulk wasn't even aware Thor was around and in the midst of fighting Green Hulk
You are truly ignorant when it comes to Thor. 😂
The thing is though, that Thor didn't press the attack after that first hit, he stopped and gave a speech, add that to the fact that the book made no mention of the hit injuring/stunning Rulk and it starts to sound like people are just wanting to make excuses for Rulk being on the losing end of the encounter.
Because, make no mistake, Rulk even admitted that Hulk likely saved his life by getting him away from Thor.