Originally posted by Sado22
i found you a source without you asking for one. and now since you've got nothing to actually back yourself up...you copout.
Back myself up, on what? I'm asking you here, not the other way around. No. You're the one copping out if anything. I asked you to find me a direct official source that states this; you don't. You simply just avoid it and attempt to turn it around in yet another "cop out" retort.
You've done it numerous times in "Ken Masters vs Paul Phoenix", you're doing it again now. Stop already.
Originally posted by Sado22
if you don't want me to think you're angry cut back on the caps lock, genius. capslock in online conversation express yelling, anger, frustration and annoyance.
Yes, because you're a so-called expert on deciphering emotions, right? Not everyone uses caps lock simply because they're as you said, frustrated/yelling/anger. Suggesting such is VERY narrow minded of you.
I use it when I'm too lazy to type/click the italics to emphasize something, in the previous case exasperation at your blindness, as demonstrated above. It's really sad how you insist on dragging this topic off-track simply for the case of defending the fact that you're patronizing something that doesn't even exist. I'll continue to use capitals to emphasize as I wish, thanks.
Originally posted by Sado22
oh and saying "MY GOD" etc isn't helping your case much either.
My case on what? Saying "MY GOD" in big capital letters turns me into a froth-mouthed, raging poster, right?
Originally posted by Sado22
they were bullets. what do you suggest they were? pellets? just cuz you see them doesn't make them not bullets.
Where on Earth did this come from?
For spirit's sake, stop jumping to ridiculous conclusions. I acknowledged at least once or twice that they were bullets; however, you're overhyping the fact that they are bullets and attempting to use it. Just because they're bullets doesn't make them all travel at constant speed or a path.
Was it a bullet from a handgun?
Was it a bullet from a heavy revolver?
Was it a bullet from an assault rifle?
Was it a bullet from a sniper rifle?
What make was the gun?
Direction? Wind speed?
Saying that "they're bullets" means absolutely nothing to me, Sado; the circumstances do.
Originally posted by Sado22
on top of that they were materia charged which only makes them faster and stronger.
Stronger, yes. They were able to punch dents into the First Tsurugi.
Faster? No, if anything they seemed even slower than a bullet fired from a normal handgun. Even an M68 bullet traveled faster than that.
Originally posted by Sado22
and exactly what are you assuming was coming out of those pistols anyway?
Bullets, as I've just said?
Originally posted by Sado22
they were gunblades and IIRC they were modified revolvers. or something along those lines.
Modified revolvers.
Originally posted by Sado22
he's using the blade end a couple of times. infact (i saw FFAC a few years ago) but most of the time in fact i remember him using the blade end.
No, he was using the flat of the blade most, if not all, of the time.
Originally posted by Sado22
back at ya. your copouts are as good as ever.
so is your temper😉
What temper?
Seriously, every post I see:
"Now see here, Sado..."
"Copout"
"Actually, Sado..."
"Copout"
"But if you just look at this, Sado..."
"Copout"
If that isn't a poor excuse for a retort, I don't know what is. You just did it again. I keep having to push this under your nose, and judging from what I've seen from you I will likely continue to do so.
Originally posted by Sado22
you can say that to feel better. all i see is you blame me for something you're doing yourself.
I told you to read above because you were taking something entirely out of context. No. MULTIPLE times now, you've taken something that I've said entirely out of context, or misread the question.
Where's your proof that I've been doing more than you have?
You're avoiding the blame by putting it on someone else; in this case, myself.
Which happens to be the typical definition of a "copout". Hypocrite.
Originally posted by Sado22
refresh my memory. there is no proof of "gouki>steel"
Read JustFrame's arguments earlier in this thread.
Originally posted by Sado22
what? that's not true. that's teleportation. aint got nothing to do with speed, mang.
Which explains why he is COMPLETELY invincible during the move, right? I didn't say it had to do with speed, it just makes him intangible. You can't slice nothingness and expect to do damage.
Originally posted by Sado22
er....gouki dies after omnislash.
No, because it doesn't hit him. Period.
Originally posted by Sado22
and not it aint instantaneous either. no proof of that. and the one time akuma teleports on-screen it took a while (Akuma SFA2 ending)
What, Misogi or Ashura Warp? Misogi is instantaneous. Ashura warp is a slow-ass teleport, but it has very fast startup. Ashura doesn't NEED to be fast, it makes him invincible for a short amount of time, just enough to let him avoid Omnislash.
Originally posted by Sado22
and why am i thinking that misogi was only from CvsSNK2? i don't recall him doing it in anyother game. sorry but i haven't played any SF in a very long time
Misogi was used first in CvS2, correct. Gouki had apparently learned it by that time frame.
Originally posted by Sado22
which he wouldn't need because the move is instantaneous.
The charge up for it isn't. As soon as Gouki sees the swords separate he'd just ashura warp through it. The man has reflexes to the point of ridiculousness, remember.
Originally posted by Sado22
Sephiroth for instance was already ready for a counter but got pwned before he knew what happened.
No, Sephiroth was PREPARING for a counter. He was almost ready for it when Cloud pulled Omnislash V5 off and owned him. Your memory fails you.
Originally posted by Sado22
didn't say you were insulting him. i said are you trying to suggest that cloud took out TWO swords to parry the debri.
And he quite plainly did, he separated the F. Tsurugi into two to parry that debris. Also, the First Tsurugi is FAR superior as one united blade than as two different ones. Or are you denying that?
Originally posted by Sado22
the bold parts say otherwise. why were you pointing it out unless you weren't trying to prove something. are you creating "noise"?
You said you haven't seen the movie in years, right?
I'm adding those parts (which are actually relevant) in order to clarify which scene I was talking about in the first place, and describing what happened.
Originally posted by Sado22
still....not disintegration. and not by a longshot. capiche?
Alright.
Originally posted by Sado22
you mean goutetsu? gouken was ryu and ken's master. not gouki's. and goutetsu did teach gouken and gouki the SGS. it was a part of anastsuken karate's course then.
Yes, that's why I said it was an ansatsuken move and that Gouken did not teach it to his students...I'm not even sure why you brought this up.
Originally posted by Sado22
i know they can kill. yes. but so far, all they seem to kill are regular people.
That's because for the most part Gouki has pulled them off on regular people.
Originally posted by Sado22
read over what i said again. these moves don't kill anyone who can actually fight.
And when, canonically, has he actually pulled off any other specials in the fights that he's gotten into?
Originally posted by Sado22
"wasn't even trying"? nope. he wasn't fighting him on the Shin-akuma level, yes, but still how much was he holding back is unknown. so your point is moot since noone here knows the exact difference between shinakuma and akuma in terms of power.
No, but we do know to some extent from what gameplay offers (he has ridiculously low defence and stamina) and what he did to Ryu during that fight; remember, Gouki was taunting him and also encouraging him to embrace Satsui No Hadou. Then when Gouki decided to leave, he pretty much owned Ryu without actually hurting him (sunk the island they were on with Kongoretsu (or whatever it was called) and left. This is why I believe he wasn't even trying with Ryu; Ken was actually trying and he got owned easily by Akuma, and we know that Ryu isn't a whole world better than Ken.
Originally posted by Sado22
if two swords are equally sharp or comparably sharp, then they wont cut through eachother. that's one of the most commonly known things about sword fighting. that's why when a ronin fought a samurai in the old days they didn't just chop through eachother's sword but instead the battles would be epic. same applied to sword fights in any part of the world in any time or era.
No, it has to do with
strength of the material, not how sharp it is. Also, the First Tsurugi is more of a crushing weapon with a sharp edge. Sharpness means nothing if the material he's hacking at is stronger.