Originally posted by Burning thought
Jesus you prob dont read any of the posts before you debate points, this is a debate and its your place to actually try and understand what the arguments were and who they were coming from, what your saying there and now is A: crushing your buddy Becci's comment (or was it Utrigos) on the same point ime mocking and B: therefore your making a fool of yourself and confusing this debate by messing up who is debating what.
Stop blabbering. All I saw was you trying to wildly form theories and speculations on the course of the Lich King fight in the upcoming expansion and how it would entail, where absolutely nothing has been founded or confirmed yet about the boss encounter in the game, and every single one of your theories seems to support your claim earlier that the LK > Malygos.
That's why I ASKED, remember? Great way to acknowledge. I wouldn't be calling someone else a fool, considering how many times I've had to keep you on track.
Originally posted by Burning thought
Azeroth will fall, no mortals or army of them could take on canonically the enormous undying hordes of the Lich King, it would take vast Dragon support/aspects and other forces to take the army alone,
The Burning Legion is far greater and more numerous than any other military force, undead or not, and they have been beaten back in the past by Azeroth as a united force. TWICE, I might add. For all your "knowledge" of the Warcraft universe, you seem to fail to acknowledge a few things.
Are you under the impression that the army of Undead (originating from the corpses and battlefield casualties of both sides of Azeroth alone) is greater than the Burning Legion? Remember, Sargeras came to many worlds before he found Azeroth, and he either conquered and devoured or twisted the inhabitants to his own will, adding them to his own forces.
Even before that he scoured far and wide around the UNIVERSE to find his army. His numbers are those of multiple worlds. In the War of the Ancients novels you would see the kind of scale that his army was on. The Scourge army is absolutely nothing in comparison. You have absolutely no idea of how large it actually was considering you haven't seem to have read those books, so I'll enlighten you a little:
After the countless demons passing through by the second book and fighting the defenders, one of the night elf commanders of the host says:
"By the gods, have we not made a dent in their forces yet?"
Krasus: "Yes we have....but it is a very, very small dent."
Another part describes a "sea" of demons stretching back from the front line to the very HORIZON in the distance.
Since when, historically, has the Army of the Dead fielded such an incredibly massive force? Simple. It has not. Azeroth has survived FAR worse than the Scourge army, mark my words.
Originally posted by Burning thought
then youve got the Lich King himself. Sargerus turned out not to be much of a threat at all, his avatar crushed, his plans in ruins and him thrown out into the void.
You amuse me.
You seem to act like you know more about Sargeras when you actually don't. His avatar was but a small shadow of his power, the full power of his physical and spiritual being locked away in a nether region between planes. Historically, when Malfurion and Illidan collapsed the final portal, Sargeras made the mistake of attempting to step through anyways and was trapped in a bubble between worlds. When the portal disappeared, Sargeras did not die, but was trapped. Even then he managed to physically exist in Azeroth to some point and create a manifestation of himself, but because of his limited power Aegwynn was able to defeat him ably.
Not much of a threat at all? Go back to where you told me to read posts properly and ask yourself how you have the stones to tell other people that. Like I said before and that you seem to have ignored yet again, his army, the one with so many demons as to be near infinite in nature is nothing to him. I will quote the book directly here.
Commander: "What does it matter if he just stays where he is and directs him?"
Korialstrasz: "The Burning Legion is but a shadow of his terrible darkness. Trust in me that we have hope even if every demon who serves him steps through, but no hope if we defeat all only to have him step into our world."
Originally posted by Burning thought
Wheras weve got Lich King before most of his power gaining and smashing most of the world, knocking human civlisation down the drain and kicking aside the high elves, almost making them extinct and in a way succeeding in that by them becoming Blood elves.
This is getting sad.
Where does he say that he "smashes most of the world"? The only place he even affected were the northern parts of Lordaeron, Quel'thalas and some parts of Kalimdor. Whereas you see agents and forces of the Burning Legion scattered all over the world. Stop overhyping the Lich King.
Go back and go read your WarCraft III: RoC game manual history, please.
The threat of Sargeras threatened to destroy the whole world as we know it, not just ambitions but actual actions. He didn't just destroy civilisation, or just one or two races. His army put the whole WORLD into calamity, that's why every single race banded together to fight him.
Originally posted by Burning thought
Wow, that makes the entire question of Sarg vs Lich King answered, thanks Krasus, words from some dragon do not make your argument, so what?
Have you sunk so low as to deny the lore itself? That's exactly what you're doing. Are you refusing the word of a character in the actual world itself? Are you insisting you know better than the character (more than 10,000 years old)
The word of a single dragon who is in his own right as wise and smart as the Aspects themselves and has been through both wars. He's describing someone else, not himself. His judgement is not clouded.
A pathetic retort of yours here, I must say.
Originally posted by Burning thought
theres words that state the LK, narrators words as well not a dragon whos personality, time of him saying it and many other things coming into the reason he is saying it, which said the Lich King is [b]all powerful, infnite in Necromacny powers etc etc but ime not one to say Lich King is omnipotent even if the RPG which utrigos cluches to does say such hyperbole.[/b]
Narrator's words? From where? Which video?
Give me proof, whatever claim you make without proof is insignificant.
If this is Arthas just talking about himself, it kind of defies the point, since Illidan was also shooting his mouth off in the TBC opening movie.
Originally posted by Burning thought
because there are no facts behind the Lich King ,there [b]ARE only ifs and maybe, [/b]
Exactly, so you can only speculate and not have solid backup at all, therefore it does not count as a real argument at all.
Go figure.
Originally posted by Burning thought
thats probably why you and Becci are failing in arguments atm, massively due to your lack of knowledge on the current Lich King which is very well because he is not massively documented.
Excuse me? Becci and I fail at our arguments because they have a basis in fact, while your "arguments" are just based on pure speculation?
I'd think very hard indeed about what you're trying to say here. That statement was stupid on multiple levels. I'm sure any debators worth half their salt would agree. Arguments need backup, as in solid facts and figures, not guesses and maybes.
Originally posted by Burning thought
I said Becci's arguments and yours fall flat because your saying facts about things, like how Elune, Aspects, etc etc will definatley not be doing something that you dont know
Oh, we do know, because it took far worse for the Aspects to react in the past before. Like I said, Arthas/Ner'Zhul and the Scourge is a gnat compared to Sargeras and the Burning Legion.
We based our arguments upon evidence where things have already happened, the circumstances that made them happen, etc. What have you to offer?
"THEY'RE NOT GOING TO BE DEFINITIELY GOING TO SOMETHING THAT YOU DONT KNOW"
"Um, yeah they definitely won't be and that's a fact. You see, they barely got up off their asses to help the lesser races for things far worse than this in the past. Understand?"
There's the entire argument in two sentences.
Originally posted by Burning thought
therefore only a Blizzard employee/story editer will know what happens in the Lich King fight, what happens, what he faces, it doesnt matter how much lore you know, it wont help you there
It won't help me there in
what?
Stop your mindless rambling please.
Originally posted by Burning thought
you can only do those wonderful assumptions which you have shown you hate so much.
Hahaha, terrible assumption. I don't hate them at all, I enjoy speculating about the upcoming encounters. In fact, my entire guild and I were talking about it yesterday. Try again.
I only criticise your USE of those assumptions in what is supposed to be a black and white debate, which of course is utterly ridiculous.