Originally posted by DarkC
Honestly. It’s simply stupid how you attempt to attack every single point I make even if I’m right, because it just simply shows how overobsessed with this debate you are. You’re attempting to flaunt your references to mine for some reason, despite them technically being on the same level of validity.It’s not an official site, it’s stated quite plainly on the main WoWWiki page that it’s a fan-made site, that is in no way affiliated with Blizzard, therefore you cannot use the site as a proper reference.
If the site has references of its own anyways, why don’t you mention them instead? You make no sense. Wowwiki is not all-powerful – considering that anyone can edit it as they wished, not just Blizzard Employees.
You’re still not explaining how, despite me asking you to numerous times.
You’re still trying to make unfounded declarations in the hope that they will be accepted. They will not. They’re just, as I said before, shit arguments. I don’t know entirely why you keep doing this, maybe you’re off in some faraway land where they believe that repeating a claim over and over again repeatedly is going to make it fact.“Your argument fails”
“You are irrelevant”
“Your sources fail”
Right, right.[b]1 - The fact that the dragons do not interfere with threats that mortals can handle.
It’s already been shown in the past that even in their world under attack and in threat from complete destruction the dragons and even the Demigods still have trouble taking action despite being aware of the peril in the world. There was a passage with a conversation between an unknown red dragon and blue dragon, and both of them said to the other that the night elves were foolish, but they would not take action until one of their Aspects commanded so.
Even with the Legion’s assault on Azeroth long underway the dragons did not mobilize until the end of the second book, and the demigods the middle of the final book.
2 – The Burning Legion is technically a greater army at its full strength
Haha, you’re really getting into this, aren’t you?
This is just proving my point before, you’re too far into it that it’s clouding your judgement. It’s just dumb, you just offered some cliché challenge to me like it’s some corny futuristic fight between the bad guy and the good guy.
Then you’re being a terrible hypocrite, as usual.
Read that passage where I replied to your silly trash talking that you needed to teach me how to debate. See that? That’s why you’re an absolutely disgusting excuse for a debater, you violate so many things it’s not even funny all the time, just sad. That’s why there’s so much in that post.
I have backed up most of my points. I have stated examples, quotes (both your posts, and dialogue from the novels, either proves a point), or referred to posts that contained the support or evidence, etc. You, on the other hand…you’ve proven that all you’re useful for right now is simply just trash talking, because it’s what you’re predominantly doing. Actually, right now…it’s just about all you’re doing, truth be told.
You’re not bothering to explain why at all, you’re just making these claims repeatedly.
When I ask for support or an explanation, you simply continue to either abuse my argument itself, or simply continue to make your own unsupported claims. Like I’ve said, claims like these need support. Actual support, not just repeating them time and time again.“Irrelevant”
“Irrelevant”
“Yeah, how?”
“They’re just irrelevant”That’s what you keep doing, you simply state your claim again.
One of my earlier arguments addressed this habit of yours, and so far in this first post you’ve successfully proven me correct. It’s a pattern that is so redundant, that you cannot even stray from it even if I’ve told you too and pointed out why your logic or your point is faulty. It’s not that hard to understand why: it lacks support.
No backup, no support = failed argument.
I’ve already reminded you of this several times, and from the looks of it I am probably going to have to continue to as well.
Oh, you’re still hotheaded enough to make fun of my sources, are you?
Care explaining why they are “weak”, and why they are only good for “mockeries”? The authors, when they were writing the books, were guided and endorsed by Chris Metzen himself. Metzen was a big fan of Richard Knaak, even. In the Warcraft Archive, before each part Metzen included a small section on how the book got started.
Laugh at that, if you will. And explain why this time instead of doing what you’ve been doing for the last 4 pages or so.
Care to list some examples, like I did?
overobsessed, thats rich considering your answering all my posts which would mean your just as obsessed, your in this debate as much as I am apart from ofc ive got some good arguments and official info.
Yes, WoWwiki is not offical, who said it was? damn, there must be ghosts in my machine typing in invisible letters since i dont remember saying WoWwiki was official, ill tell you what is, the sources their refrences point to, and their refrences are right next to the information or at the bottom of it if theres a lot of information.
Ive already explained how their irrelvent, Dragon quote is completly irrelevent, the number of the legion? irrelevent AND a wild and irrelvent quote due to it doesnt give a number either, fortatley in the Scourge VS legion thread ive found official numbers. I mean hell as if I bloody care lol, please explain how the size of the legion is relevent to the Lich King, or the Dragons in the debate we had about mortal races, you obviously like strawmanning a lot.
1. this is your best argument? well fair enough I agree 100%, problem is, Mortals cannot handle the LK. And you just pointed it out, if the aspects command, who are the guardians so it makes sense.
2. well this has its own thread now so w/e well debate it there.
so these are your main arguments? I laugh
Too far? it proves no point apart from your overactive imaginaton like a lot of your points are, so no, this helps my points...and ill clear this up for you, I didnt mean any of that, i meant this is the only thread we need to settle this, thrown your arguments in and Ill shatter your pathetic excuses for points and i hope those two above are not the entirety of them....
Thats not a reason to damage anyones debating ,what is, is irrelvent points, constant hostility, you gobbing out your filth to try and impress yourself and trying to convince yourself of how your a better debater is more pathetic still......
truth be told? thats two lies, false statements then saying their the truth, you got a birds nest on your nose pinocchio? lol.....
truth be told, youve got far more trash talk, all your posts are trash talk, unfortatley to make this claim I would need to be able to quote all your posts for evidence and KMC boxes cannot handle that
Your sources are weak because regardless who has written the book, taking random quotes from it doesnt help you at all, ive already listed too many example, as i said above its not possible to quote ALL your posts.