Originally posted by Elite Hunter
Minor point correction LS, Bane most likely did have a lot of Sadow's knowledge since he did have Nadd's holocron, who did learn under Sadow's spirit.
Which doesn't mean too much. Nadd didn't complete his training under Sadow and most of Sadow's knowledge was stored in the temple protected by the Sith Wyrm that Kun killed. Which means that Nadd probably didn't access much of Sadow's knowledge. Otherwise he wouldn't need Kun to kill the beast and optain the stuff Sadow left behind there.
Originally posted by Borbarad
Which doesn't mean too much. Nadd didn't complete his training under Sadow and most of Sadow's knowledge was stored in the temple protected by the Sith Wyrm that Kun killed. Which means that Nadd probably didn't access much of Sadow's knowledge. Otherwise he wouldn't need Kun to kill the beast and optain the stuff Sadow left behind there.
Rule of Two
As [Sadow's] apprentice, Nadd had absorbed all his knowledge and teachings, transferring them into the Holocron before murdering Sadow and taking his place.
Faunus, where is that from? There are conflicting sources according to JvS. One says he murdered Sadow and became the DLOTS. Another one states that he was unable to become a DLOTS while the DLOTS lived, he ran to Onderon. At any rate, Bane was studying his holocron for 10 years which no doubt means there was a lot of useful information there. Doesn't really help him against Yoda but just clarifying here.
Originally posted by GideonI could momentarily employ the online jock persona so loved by the sad and lonely by pointing out to you the merits of my sex life, but I shall not. Instead, I'll simply spell this out for you. Your religion condemns sex before marriage (and masturbation); mine does not. If you consider yourself a true Christian, you cannot yet have had sex, and will instead remain a
Nebaris will stalk you as a means of demonstrating gratitude. Perhaps, for the first and only time, you can experience something along the lines of sex with a real person.
Oh wait...
Originally posted by GideonIf you're referring to the length of time between your post and mine, I have other things to do on the Internet. It was also eighteen minutes, and I grow tired of repeatedly having to correct you.
Well that was an interesting way to spent twenty minutes, Faunus.
Edit: And where have I claimed to have sex?I didn't say you did. I noted that if you had claimed to have sex while also proclaiming yourself to be a "true" Christian, you would open yourself up to accusations of hypocrisy or weakness of faith.
Cover thy ass indeed.
Cover thy ass; it's my motto. Yours is bare and beholden to the world. You have thus been spanked, sir.That's illegal.
Edit: And my posts keep getting deleted; ****ing pop-ups, erm, pop up, and when I press backspace it actually goes back a page. The internet sucks.
Originally posted by Gideon
Does anyone have an argument for that?
Sure thing, pal.
George Lucas > reference book. The allmight G-Canon, as present in form of the RotS movie and George Lucas own comment on the issue, labelling Yoda and Sidious equals (or Yoda the superior man - whatever you want to have, except Sidious being the superior combatant) turns the statement in the "Comic Companion" into C-Canon babble contradicting the higher level of canon which can, because of that, be completely ignored.
Thanks for reading.
Originally posted by GideonYou said there were none.
There are loads of statements that say that Palpatine was too strong for Yoda in their duel in the Rotunda.
But given Yoda's performance in the movie, one could interpret that to be relative to the environment.
To me it looked like Yoda was a bit better with a lightsaber. It seemed as if Sidious was struggling to keep up. Their mastery or the force seemed even. Maybe the book meant Sidious had more raw force power and reserves.