ragesRemorse
Senior Member
ummm the original jurrasic park wasnt commercial. It was an achievment in a premise that had been tried over and over but failed miserably. Jurasic park had great creativity and even better entertainment. This was a groundbreaking movie aswell. The CGI Spielberg incoorperated into this movie was never tried to the limits it was pushed in Jurassic park. If he was being commercial he would have stick with stop motion. The second i totally agree was very commercial and horrible. Speilberg said the only thing that clenched his descion on directing it was that he wanted to do a T-rex rampage in a city before anyone else. im not joking. Thats what you call bad career choice even though it did very well in the box office. I dont think JP1 is his best work but it's deffaintly credible as being an incredible and gorgeous work of entertainment
Darren aronofsky is infact a great director. Although with only two movies done. there is much to be realized about his goals as a director. This is why he cant be considred one of the best. I believe he may live on to be the best though, great vision comes from that mind. However when you say he is not commercial just because he has only done two movies i believe to be void. I'm not going against you, im just commenting on your comment. Aronofsky was targeted and agreed to do the next batman movie. Studios changed there minds though. Now i think if aronofsky was going to avoid commercialism the last movie he'd agree to do would be a batman. There are i believe though Very great great things tocome from aronofsky. Alot of modern directors openly talk about being anti-hollywood. so those two arent alone when not wanting to be commercial and typical