Originally posted by Burning thought
I can claim PIS for the Elder God, or I can claim "we didnt see the canon fight" or I can claim the same for Dark Khan, hell Dark Khan, why didnt you turn all your opponents into dust.....He doesnt need to be directly stated to affect others, it just claims regulation which is what ime stating he can do, nothing more. And the links are on the Dark Chronicle website.
lol now your just saying you have to be thick to make a diffrent interpretation on that? yes well, I think you have to be a shit for brains little bastard to try and misinterpret the quote on Darkchronicle 😉
no not really.....your case makes no sense at all...the fact its only excisted for Kain at the end of the last game sort of crushes all that "zomg not in another game" thing, as does a developer statement 🙁 no ime sorry but if you read it, he influences the regulation of magic with his magic, so using defintions from Oxford (you used this one dont you?) and others Kain [b]rules and maintains
and controls the conduct of magic while also controlling it as if he was the authority over its force and law.Therefore he commands magic literally to be infnitly powerful in his hands, and worthless in his opponents.
That does not tell me she wrote Blood omen or that she was apart of Silicon knights.
yes the writer will, unfortunatley the writer does not disagree or write anything to contradict the developers, so now we just have Developers>>>you guys..... [/B]
Nothing from the developers and yet you continue to referee to them?
Dark Kahn did enough when he used his power to erase beings from across two universes seperately. "The force of My anger rips through both universes, many beings vanish from existance", now you are free to interprete this any way you want, you have like the rest of us the freedom of speech.
So what we have is you cooking soup on a bone with no meat?
You want to make the case that Galactus didn't transmute Hercules? Be my guest and make a thread in the comic section 🙂 So the quote on Dark Chronicles (which isn't the official website of the game nore is it a interview) secondly the notation for the quote is down.
First of what do you choose to focus on in the given quote? I focus on Influence because to me it's painfully obvious that, that's what is being refered to. Remember that is stat that their magic allow them to influence the Regulation, not control the regulation there is a huge difference. Secondly you are misunderstanding exactly in what perspective Regulation is used. If we take the first example used by Oxford (which I like to use yes) http://www.askoxford.com/concise_oed/orexxgulation?view=uk It requires that in order for the authority to have any given ability to maintain the law, it requires power, look at Pakistan for instance they want to regulate Taliban yet failed, they then applied force yet they can't quell them because they doesn't have a force large enough to operate on such a large front.
Where does it stat that he can access infinite magic? Nowhere.
She speaks about Blood Omen and explain how the Blood Omen worked and what happened in them, why would they ask her question concerning a product that she according to you had no influence on, that is like asking Morrison what he meant by having the Fantastic Four doing this and that in a recently published comic while he is writing Superman in DC.
Did I say she did? I merely pointed out the Writer is above the Developers. And she does stat that the Scion of Balance has absolutely nothing to do with Kain being Balance Guardian.