Who is more powerful, Thor or the Silver Surfer?

Started by darthgoober36 pages

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
I’ve been reading through this particular thread, and I’m finding some statements somewhat baseless to an extent. Skimming through, “Blood and Thunder” it’s pretty clear to me that Thor had no amp at all until he received the Power Gem and Thanos placed him in that containment field. Before that, no indication of an amp was given at all, besides that statement made by Beta Ray Bill, who was ignorant of the condition Thor was in.

He thought Thor was under the Warrior Madness, so of course he would believe Thor was drawing strength from the madness, as that is a side effect of the madness. His believed it so much, that he went and attacked the Infinity Watch and so on. Of course Beta Ray Bill would have come to the conclusion that it was Warrior Madness. Thor an Asgardian god, suddenly succumbs to raving like a lunatic, and starts hallucinating. Someone like Thor doesn’t succumb to normal illnesses and such. What other possible conclusion could Beta Ray Bill come to besides that one, based on his limited observation and limited knowledge of Thor’s condition? The simple fact is that, this statement was made under false knowledge and ignorance. To argue that Thor had an amp based on that is like I said, rather baseless.

The problem with your argument is that the amp was demonstrated immediately following Bill's statement. Thor was pretty much on his last legs when Bill and Surfer started conversing and Bill mentioned him drawing strength from his madness. Then he one shotted the both of them, and went on to thrash both Warlock and Surfer together(after Surfer woke up I mean). That's a pretty clear indication that his strength/power was increased during BRB and Surfer's exchange.

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Another argument I have come across is Adam Warlock’s statement. He said Thor seemed quicker than he remembered and seemed more dangerous. First of all, memory is subjugated to doubt and so on. At best, what you can get from this statement is that Thor got an amp in speed which in itself is a stretch.

Like he said, Thor was more dangerous. If anyone had read the first fight, they would know that all they had was a brawl. They went toe to toe using nothing more than their fists. Here the moment Thor starts unleashing his godly powers, and using energy attacks, Adam Warlock comes to the conclusion that Thor is more dangerous than he remembered. Which is logical, as “Raw Power > Raw Strength”, is the case in most of these cosmic battles. All Thor did was throw punches, in their first fight as I recall. Here Thor did much more than that. He started unleashing his true power and went beyond simple raw strength.


Unless there's proof that standard Thor's raw power is greater than his strength x10(as Thor was in a confirmed state of Warrior Madness in his first fight with Warlock) it's really not all that logical. While something like his Godblast might generate more force than his strength x10, you'd be hard pressed to find any examples demonstrating that his generic energy blast(like he was using during Blood and Thunder) are more powerful than a punch from him when his strength's been increased to the degree that it is while in Warrior Madness.

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Adam Warlock also goes on to state in this fight that Thor is not be the unstoppable fighting machine that fear and distant memory causes his mind’s eye to perceive, which highlights the fact that memories are subjugated to change and so on which I previously stated. He states that fear and time could have warped his perception of Thor on top of everything else.

Again, to come to the conclusion that Thor was amped based on a statement that is made when one character is in ignorance, and another statement based on uncertainty, and is contradicted to an extent by the same character, is somewhat baseless.


Uh... no. You're scan is from the opening seconds of Warlock and Thor squaring off, he didn't "go on" to say that. And he didn't say "Thor's not the unstoppable fighting machine...", he said "Perhaps Thor may not be...". He thought he might be remembering Thor as being more powerful than he actually is but then the fight progressed and it turned out that Thor's actually WORSE than he remembers him being the first time around.

Edited at Darthgoober's request.

Originally posted by Kris Blaze
What's so impressive about overpowering Mephisto? Thor did it after beating his own friends and defeating the entire legions of hell, that's fighting for hours.

I didn't say it was particularly impressive or that it was beyond Thor's abilities. A point was brought up about the Godblast beating a skyfather, so I pointed out that Surfer overpowered a skyfather. You've got to remember I'm not giving Surfer the win in this thread, I'm saying that the two are approximately equal.

Originally posted by darthgoober
I didn't say it was particularly impressive or that it was beyond Thor's abilities. A point was brought up about the Godblast beating a skyfather, so I pointed out that Surfer overpowered a skyfather. You've got to remember I'm not giving Surfer the win in this thread, I'm saying that the two are approximately equal.
¨

But it's difficult to say if overpowering Mephisto is a comparable analogy to the godblast-skyfather bit. Mephisto's been beaten by practically everyone, Black Panther knocked him out with a single punch once 🙁

Originally posted by Kris Blaze
¨

But it's difficult to say if overpowering Mephisto is a comparable analogy to the godblast-skyfather bit. Mephisto's been beaten by practically everyone, Black Panther knocked him out with a single punch once 🙁

I thought Panther beat him by cutting him off from his power source while outside his realm(or was that another time)? Mephisto definitely has low showings outside his realm, but the thing that puts Surfer's feat into the "impressive" category is that he and Meph were INSIDE his realm. Also note, I may have been wrong about the feat. I remember thinking that Surfer actually overpowered him before, but looking back it's could also be interpreted a couple of different ways so you might disagree...

http://i498.photobucket.com/albums/rr347/darthgoober/SS_v2_001_one-shot_23a.jpg
http://i498.photobucket.com/albums/rr347/darthgoober/SS_v2_001_one-shot_23b.jpg

Now that's not as impressive as outright overwhelming him like I thought of course, but I think it's still up there somewhere with beating a skyfather with something like 2 or 3 appearances.

Originally posted by darthgoober
I thought Panther beat him by cutting him off from his power source while outside his realm(or was that another time)? Mephisto definitely has low showings outside his realm, but the thing that puts Surfer's feat into the "impressive" category is that he and Meph were INSIDE his realm. Also note, I may have been wrong about the feat. I remember thinking that Surfer actually overpowered him before, but looking back it's could also be interpreted a couple of different ways so you might disagree...

http://i498.photobucket.com/albums/rr347/darthgoober/SS_v2_001_one-shot_23a.jpg
http://i498.photobucket.com/albums/rr347/darthgoober/SS_v2_001_one-shot_23b.jpg

Now that's not as impressive as outright overwhelming him like I thought of course, but I think it's still up there somewhere with beating a skyfather with something like 2 or 3 appearances.

- I'm thinking about the time BP just ran into his apartment and punched Mephisto in the mouth. Naturally it was on earth, so he was weakened, but still.

- It's impressive, though Thor's fight with him was more of an actual battle and had a more decisive outcome.

Originally posted by Kris Blaze
- I'm thinking about the time BP just ran into his apartment and punched Mephisto in the mouth. Naturally it was on earth, so he was weakened, but still.

- It's impressive, though Thor's fight with him was more of an actual battle and had a more decisive outcome.


When was this? Was it the time when Meph had been waiting for him in his apartment with that guy for BP to show up? If so, I'm pretty sure that while he was waiting BP had a forcefield placed around his apartment that cut off Meph from his realm and depowered him to an extreme.

Well that depends on how you interpret it. Like I said I always interpreted it as Surfer quickly overpowering Meph(though there was some more interaction previously) and personally I'd consider that the more impressive of the two.

Originally posted by Kris Blaze
- It's impressive, though Thor's fight with him was more of an actual battle and had a more decisive outcome.

Kinda like this one...
http://img137.imageshack.us/i/mephra2.jpg/
http://img129.imageshack.us/i/meph1qq9.jpg/
http://img147.imageshack.us/i/meph2rs4.jpg/
http://img147.imageshack.us/i/meph3vn8.jpg/
http://img142.imageshack.us/i/meph4cg3.jpg/
http://img147.imageshack.us/i/meph5pz9.jpg/

Originally posted by darthgoober
I understand quan, you think that you're a better judge of Thor than BRB is and that you're opinion trumps what is said in the comic. Believe it if you want, like I said that's on you.

He said that Thor was more faster and more dangerous than he was while amped by Warrior Madness. If you can't connect the dots there then that's another thing that'll just have to be on you.

He said that Thor was more faster and more dangerous than he was while amped by Warrior Madness. If you can't connect the dots there then that's another thing that'll just have to be on you.

Just answer the questions quan. Didn't Galactus JUST go through a massive battle and wasn't he portrayed in a subpar manner in the story? How is a feat that REQUIRED the belt relevant in a thread that doesn't feature it?

Not if he doesn't have access to it for the purposes of this thread. If you want to allow the feat, you'll have to make a "Who is more powerful, Thor w/Belt of Strength wrapped around Hammer or the Silver Surfer" thread. It's just that simple.

But was Surfer's situation identical to Thor's, or was Thor's help a massively powerful Elder of the Universe while Surfer's was guys like the Shiar and the FF?

I wouldn't know, I was never actually paying attention to the vote.

Neither does your example. Unless Thor has at some point expelled so much energy that a black hole formed as a side effect, you can't say with any definitive certainty that Thor's output is higher since Thor's never actually shown the ability to match Surfer's feat.

You're asking if Thor can use the Belt of Strength to create a blast more powerful than Surfer? Probably. Hard to say definitively though since no black hole formed as a side effect from that blast either.

No, BrB was wrong about warrior's madness proving his opinion isn't always 100 percent accurate. if you can prove it was then do so.

He was gong off his own recollection which doesn't mean amp. So I guess if we take these words as amp then a lot of characters are amped. Warlock never once stated he had an amp and you trying to prove he was amped is completely without any bit of real solid proof.

He did against the Surfer as well. I guess it only counts when he goes through a battle against Thor and not against the Surfer.

The belt wasn't required for the feat. That's why it's fair game. Can Surfer's power destroy the hammer?

You said before that Thing punched him out. Now I guess thing, ff4, surfer, etc. aren't good enough. Quit making up excuses for the Surfer. That's all you do.

That doesn't prove anything. Comics don't have to make rationale sense so if one blast leaves a blackhole and one doesn't that doesn't mean the blackhole created blast is more powerful. Is that what you are claiming?

Can Surfer destroy his hammer under his power alone?

Originally posted by Mindship
If someone punched you when you weren't looking or not expecting it, would it effect you the same as if you saw it coming? Think Beta Ray Bill gettin' clobbered by Surfer's board.

My point is this: Thor had the opportunity to strike at a severely weakened Galactus when Galactus was not expecting such an attack. My question remains: Has the Surfer ever done the same thing (maybe he has, IDK)? Has the Surfer ever hit a severely weakened Galactus with an all-out blast when Galactus was not expecting such an attack? Unless he has, then we don't have a direct comparison, only supposition.

In effect, it seems as if you're comparing Thor's one-time going all-out against Galactus to Surfer's always (?) holding back against Galactus.

I gave you real number values for creating a black hole using pure energy, requiring some 10x the power of the most powerful explosion known, second only to the Big Bang.

I understand the point you are trying to make. His godblast would have the same effect as if he were looking or not.

I don't think Surfer has any all out blasts anywhere near as powerful as Thor's. That's the point. he doesn't have it under his arsenal.

You're claiming now the Surfer always holds back against Galactus. Are you kidding me? I guess he held back in galactus the devourer when the fate of earth was on the line? Are you kidding me?

Real world examples fail in comics as nothing is consistent.

Originally posted by Ambient
I know BRB was wrong about the ailment but not about the symptom like drawing strength from the insanity + we have it confirmed by Warlock, who said that this Thor was far stronger than WM Thor (Amp), then there's Odin who thought it was WM and we all know that he of all people would be able to sense if his son was drawing strength from an outside source or just bloodlusted. If Thor was just bloodlusted Odin would know its not WM. All this points out to the symptoms/effect of both condition very similar. incl. amp, spread, mental faculties. The only diff. is the cause..

If you really wanna get technical, the only time Thor being narrated as amp was when he was imprisoned in the solidified forcefield, the rest his done so without amp (not specified) and that would incl. his fight against Thanos... That is stretching a lot, less your saying his = < Thanos, consider his back to back fight against Brb/Surfer/Warlock/Infinity Watch/Strange and Thanos couldn't put him down.. There is also no indication or as you put it "literally describe" that Thor was only bloodlusted in this arc while we have few indications to our points..

WM would be raw strength, speed, ferocity x 10 that is what Warlock compared Insane Thor and exactly similar scenario hammer blows minus surfer..

BrB gave his opinion on what he knew about Thor as did Warlock. Neither said he was amped. Drawing strength from the madness doesn't even imply an amp.

When did warlock say he was much stronger?

Yes, it states it plain as day. Thor was amping his strength to break free of the forceblock. Thor is unable to be beat physically while tapping into the power gem anyways making any damage Thanos did while wearing it insignificant.

There is no indication he was amped. None. BrB was incorrect on Thor's mental condition and Warlock was going of fpast memory and not once did he say he was amped. Not once.

Originally posted by quanchi112
His godblast would have the same effect as if he were looking or not.
Yes, you said that before, and I disagree for reasons stated.

I don't think Surfer has any all out blasts anywhere near as powerful as Thor's. That's the point. he doesn't have it under his arsenal.

No one would've guessed Thor had a "godblast" until he did it (and it was disturbingly effective). I'm not necessarily trying to undermine it; just saying the Galactus incident as an A>B>C comparison with the Surfer may be flawed. Also, do not underestimate the power it took to channel Crunch energy (and after the pummeling he took). Here's one moment when the Surfer did surprise Galactus with what he could do.

You're claiming now the Surfer always holds back against Galactus...?

I've been saying I don't know. If you know of a scan where the Surfer is giving 100% against a very weak Galactus not expecting such an attack, please post it.

Real world examples fail in comics as nothing is consistent.

Black holes have been fairly consistent in comics, if only to show how durable some top tier dog (eg, Superman, Surfer) really is. Seems black holes are generally regarded as "ultimate tests" in strength, durability and power.

Originally posted by Mindship
Yes, you said that before, and I disagree for reasons stated.

No one would've guessed Thor had a "godblast" until he did it (and it was disturbingly effective). I'm not necessarily trying to undermine it; just saying the Galactus incident as an A>B>C comparison with the Surfer may be flawed. Also, do not underestimate the power it took to channel Crunch energy (and after the pummeling he took). Here's one moment when the Surfer did surprise Galactus with what he could do.

I've been saying I don't know. If you know of a scan where the Surfer is giving 100% against a very weak Galactus not expecting such an attack, please post it.

Black holes have been fairly consistent in comics, if only to show how durable some top tier dog (eg, Superman, Surfer) really is. Seems black holes are generally regarded as "ultimate tests" in strength, durability and power.

It drains my strength as sunlight drains the dark. Meaning that no matter the case it would have the same effect. Thor is far mightier and more powerful than the Surfer who is but a gnat before mighty Galactus.

Surfer manipulating the crunch also would have caused his death.

The attack with Galactus' own words would have had the same effect regardless. It drained his power and sent fleeing.

It's been a while I suspect since you actually saw the scan.

No, they aren't. Just because Odin blasts the Surfer into submission with one blast and no blackhole formed that doesn't mean Surfer's blasts are mightier than that. Surfer is nothing before Odin and Galactus. Thor has proven himself to be more powerful than Surfer.

Originally posted by Ambient
Kinda like this one...
http://img137.imageshack.us/i/mephra2.jpg/
http://img129.imageshack.us/i/meph1qq9.jpg/
http://img147.imageshack.us/i/meph2rs4.jpg/
http://img147.imageshack.us/i/meph3vn8.jpg/
http://img142.imageshack.us/i/meph4cg3.jpg/
http://img147.imageshack.us/i/meph5pz9.jpg/

Bingo.

Originally posted by quanchi112
BrB gave his opinion on what he knew about Thor as did Warlock. Neither said he was amped. Drawing strength from the madness doesn't even imply an amp.

When did warlock say he was much stronger?

Yes, it states it plain as day. Thor was amping his strength to break free of the forceblock. Thor is unable to be beat physically while tapping into the power gem anyways making any damage Thanos did while wearing it insignificant.

There is no indication he was amped. None. BrB was incorrect on Thor's mental condition and Warlock was going of fpast memory and not once did he say he was amped. Not once.


Right and they thought it was WM because they were basing it to the symptoms of the condition and remember its not just BRB but Odin as well, both can sense a spike/abnormality increase in raw power.. This is why i believed that BRB was being literal about his statement, "drawing strength in the madness" because he can sense this symptoms (abnormal /\ in strength) and also because Odin thought it is WM because, again of the symptoms. If even one of this symptoms is not present. ex. abnormal increase in strength (referred by BRB) then Odin would likely know its not WM but he did not know that it was not so, till he was given information from Warlock/Strange/Surfer.. So what I'm trying to say is that this two conditions WM and the insanity have a similar symptoms and that can only be differentiated by its cause. This is probably why i think Odin said it is "not TRUE WM" and did not call it by any other name..

It was displayed when Warlock/Surfer fought Insane Thor..

Where does it literally say that Thor was amping his strength to escape from the force block, it could have been referred to as using the power gem as a force energy blast to escape, in fact there was never any mention that he was amp in his fight with Thanos, the gem was just there for decor, it makes his helmet looks fancy 😆 .. You want us to have an exact literal word describing the event in our proof yet not on yours.. That sounds fair 🙄 .. See not just word but beyond it, you have no problem seeing it on your proof why not ours.. 😖hifty:

Yes there are many indication, BRB was incorrect with the condition but not the symptoms, Warlock is a; freakin genius, a master strategist, a level 6 in the intel. department 😱 you think he'll forget a match against one of the most strongest person in the universe.. Don't think so..

Originally posted by quanchi112
It drains my strength as sunlight drains the dark.
Of course it's still gonna effect him, given his state. But a punch is even more painful and damaging when you're not expecting it.

Surfer manipulating the crunch also would have caused his death.
He was already close to death.

It's been a while I suspect since you actually saw the scan.
I know Galactus and the Surfer have fought, many times, and Surfer does not fare well. But I've never seen Surfer, specifically, go all-out against a very weak, unsuspecting Galactus. That's why I've been asking.

No, they aren't. Just because Odin blasts the Surfer into submission with one blast and no blackhole formed that doesn't mean Surfer's blasts are mightier than that.
Odin's power is not based on physics, not even comic physics. Comic black holes are still in the top tier as far as "natural" phenomena go, the impact of their presence in a story (to showcase a character's power) being derived from their real-life counterparts.

Originally posted by quanchi112
No, BrB was wrong about warrior's madness proving his opinion isn't always 100 percent accurate. if you can prove it was then do so.

He was gong off his own recollection which doesn't mean amp. So I guess if we take these words as amp then a lot of characters are amped. Warlock never once stated he had an amp and you trying to prove he was amped is completely without any bit of real solid proof.

He did against the Surfer as well. I guess it only counts when he goes through a battle against Thor and not against the Surfer.

The belt wasn't required for the feat. That's why it's fair game. Can Surfer's power destroy the hammer?

You said before that Thing punched him out. Now I guess thing, ff4, surfer, etc. aren't good enough. Quit making up excuses for the Surfer. That's all you do.

That doesn't prove anything. Comics don't have to make rationale sense so if one blast leaves a blackhole and one doesn't that doesn't mean the blackhole created blast is more powerful. Is that what you are claiming?

Can Surfer destroy his hammer under his power alone?

I understand quan, you think that you're a better judge of Thor than BRB is and that you're opinion trumps what is said in the comic. Believe it if you want, like I said that's on you.

His recollection was of an amp because Thor was in Warrior Madness the first time they fought.

Was his fight against an opponent as powerful as he had when Thor landed his sucker punch, or was Surfer's help guys like the FF and the Shiar while Thor's was a massively powerful Elder of the Universe that was able to give Galactus a run for his money one on one?

The belt was required for the feat because Thor can't blast out enough power to drive off a Celestial without the belt. If he tried, the hammer would shatter before he released that much energy.

I'm not making up excuses, I'm acknowledging the circumstances. If up to you if you want to ignore context though.

Depends on the circumstances.

Probably not, but there's evidently a big difference between the hammer's ability to absorb energy(like it would be if Surfer was trying to shatter it) and it's ability to channel Thor's divine essence during a Godblast.

Originally posted by Ambient
Right and they thought it was WM because they were basing it to the symptoms of the condition and remember its not just BRB but Odin as well, both can sense a spike/abnormality increase in raw power.. This is why i believed that BRB was being literal about his statement, "drawing strength in the madness" because he can sense this symptoms (abnormal /\ in strength) and also because Odin thought it is WM because, again of the symptoms. If even one of this symptoms is not present. ex. abnormal increase in strength (referred by BRB) then Odin would likely know its not WM but he did not know that it was not so, till he was given information from Warlock/Strange/Surfer.. So what I'm trying to say is that this two conditions WM and the insanity have a similar symptoms and that can only be differentiated by its cause. This is probably why i think Odin said it is "not TRUE WM" and did not call it by any other name..

It was displayed when Warlock/Surfer fought Insane Thor..

Where does it literally say that Thor was amping his strength to escape from the force block, it could have been referred to as using the power gem as a force energy blast to escape, in fact there was never any mention that he was amp in his fight with Thanos, the gem was just there for decor, it makes his helmet looks fancy 😆 .. You want us to have an exact literal word describing the event in our proof yet not on yours.. That sounds fair 🙄 .. See not just word but beyond it, you have no problem seeing it on your proof why not ours.. 😖hifty:

Yes there are many indication, BRB was incorrect with the condition but not the symptoms, Warlock is a; freakin genius, a master strategist, a level 6 in the intel. department 😱 you think he'll forget a match against one of the most strongest person in the universe.. Don't think so..

Then later Odin determined it wasn't so any amps gained from a warrior madness have to be explained in this story as they are not the same thing.

He recognized the symptoms he didn't sense them. He was giving his opinion on what Thor was doing at the time and nothing more. It's a vague comment anyways so you can't even begin to prove how much strength he was actually drawing. BrB also recovered just like Thor did given enough time. That's all.

No, it wasn't. He's always been more skilled, more brutal, and twice the warrior of both of them so him out for blood with all the power at his disposal showed what he is capable of.

Do you even know what warrior madness is?

It says it right here. It actually says with each passing second he grows stronger. I mean it explains it plain as day. It can't be any more literal as machines are hooked up to him gauging his strength. Too bad BrB wasn't there at the time because he can sense amps in Thor. 😂

http://i201.photobucket.com/albums/aa41/quanchi112/07-4.jpg

Thor fought him with his hands mainly while he used his hammer and showed off his power against him this time. I think he used his hammer once the first time he fought him.

Originally posted by Mindship
Of course it's still gonna effect him, given his state. But a punch is even more painful and damaging when you're not expecting it.

He was already close to death.

I know Galactus and the Surfer have fought, many times, and Surfer does not fare well. But I've never seen Surfer, specifically, go all-out against a very weak, unsuspecting Galactus. That's why I've been asking.

Odin's power is not based on physics, not even comic physics. Comic black holes are still in the top tier as far as "natural" phenomena go, the impact of their presence in a story (to showcase a character's power) being derived from their real-life counterparts.

The point is in this instance it would have the same effect whether Galactus was looking or not. It's like saying k-nite wouldn't affect superman as much if he can see it as opposed to if he can't.

Do you think he can survive this feat if he were to do it at maximum health?

Ok, now you know he went up against a much weaker Galactus than Thor faced. Where does it state in the Thor comic that Galactus was extremely weak anyways? Maybe I am forgetting something.

Neither is Thor's. It's funny how you use a blatant doublestandard against Odin when he is also an asgardian.

Originally posted by darthgoober
I understand quan, you think that you're a better judge of Thor than BRB is and that you're opinion trumps what is said in the comic. Believe it if you want, like I said that's on you.

His recollection was of an amp because Thor was in Warrior Madness the first time they fought.

Was his fight against an opponent as powerful as he had when Thor landed his sucker punch, or was Surfer's help guys like the FF and the Shiar while Thor's was a massively powerful Elder of the Universe that was able to give Galactus a run for his money one on one?

The belt was required for the feat because Thor can't blast out enough power to drive off a Celestial without the belt. If he tried, the hammer would shatter before he released that much energy.

I'm not making up excuses, I'm acknowledging the circumstances. If up to you if you want to ignore context though.

Depends on the circumstances.

Probably not, but there's evidently a big difference between the hammer's ability to absorb energy(like it would be if Surfer was trying to shatter it) and it's ability to channel Thor's divine essence during a Godblast.

I am actually reading a story while there are elements that BrB isn't aware of since he's just a character in the story. He also doesn't possess any ability to which he can sense amps. he can give his opinion the best he can with the knowledge he has. That's all.

Thor also barely used his hammer in their first fight. You do realize that right? You do realize he wasn't fighting them both with just his bare hands in blood and thunder? What is warrior madness anyways? I'll make my point with this question in my next post.

When was Galactus in any danger against Ego? What am I missing? When was he stated to be weakened in that comic? I might be missing something, but post proof please.

So? he can destroy a reinforced belt with his own power. I have already explained why it stands. The Galactus godblast is more than proof enough > than anything the Surfer has ever done with one offensive blast.

You stated something you couldn't prove and had no recollection of. When asked to prove it you dropped it.

What context am I ignoring? Seriously?

My point is just because one blast creates a blackhole that isn't proof in and of itself that a blast that doesn't create one is inferior to the surfer blast. You can't deny it. It's just inconsistent comic physics.

That's how powerful the godblast is even when he used a reinforced hammer. It still shattered at the power that is Thor's.

The funny thing is I have so much in store for you for this battlezone. You have no idea.

Originally posted by quanchi112
The point is in this instance it would have the same effect whether Galactus was looking or not. It's like saying k-nite wouldn't affect superman as much if he can see it as opposed to if he can't.
Supposition. There is nothing to indicate that is a valid comparison.

Do you think he can survive this feat if he were to do it at maximum health?
The only certainty is that maximum health obviously would make it easier; imagine how much more he could've done if in peak form. Survive? The odds would certainly be better, but at this point no one can say either way.

Ok, now you know he went up against a much weaker Galactus than Thor faced. Where does it state in the Thor comic that Galactus was extremely weak anyways? Maybe I am forgetting something.
No, I don't know. This is what I've been saying. If no one has a scan, I'll settle for dialogue or narration quotes. Remember: Thor's intent was to "smite" Galactus, not just stopping him from feeding. Has Surfer ever tried to kill Galactus? Did he have the distance from the battlefield to prep for an all-out blast while Galactus was busy elsewhere? Maybe he did, I don't know. All I've been asking for is something to sink my teeth into (right now, the closest instance I can think of is what movie Surfer did).

Neither is Thor's. It's funny how you use a blatant doublestandard against Odin when he is also an asgardian.
Odin, shmodin. The point was that black holes are regarded as top tier "natural" phenomena in the comic book universe. Like supernovas.