Sadly I do not have any screenshots on this computer of Rift. However.
Can you really say that this:
Looks better than this?
TOR's graphics are a joke, that's one of the universally agreed-upon things about it.
I mean, I guess if you like grey, brown, and plastic-y...
Originally posted by whatthegatts?
Lies I have played TOR at mid settings and it looked better.
Nope - that was maxed out settings at 1080p screen resolution. I see no reason to not max things out if I'm able to do so.
WoW is floundering and has been for ages. Rift was recently on sale for $5 and TOR dropped to $15 and is going f2p. Pay to play is a dying business model and frankly, was never a successful business model past WoW's release.
But you're a troll, and probably one of the ones we've banned before, so I'm not surprised you're claiming this.
Originally posted by Peach
WoW is floundering and has been for ages.
How so? It still has the most subscribers out of any P2P MMO and is the most financially successful game in history.
Rift was recently on sale for $5
Who cares it is sitll P2P which is where the real costs lies and still maintains millions of subs.
and TOR dropped to $15 and is going f2p.
Only partially. There is option of paying. ToR looks much better honestly, and it has much better questing system. It is most expensive game ever made in history of game design.
Oh and btw GW2 is F2P anyway and wpouldn;t have nearly enough sales if it was P2P./
Pay to play is a dying business model and frankly, was never a successful business model past WoW's release.
Not true, hence the financial success of MMOs like Rift.
But you're a troll, and probably one of the ones we've banned before, so I'm not surprised you're claiming this.
Agree to disagree please.
Originally posted by whatthegatts?
I see no suxh* thing from GR2, and in some cases bad graphics make it harder to see the awesome art work, so it IS* matters.
* such
* does
And no, I said that its not as important as art design, not that it doesn't matter. Although I personally don't think it does much at all.
Originally posted by ArtificialGlory
I agree that the graphics of GW2 are wholly unremarkable, but ToR? Really? It looks like brown-grey vomit. At least GW2 knows how to use colours.
Peach has probably only posted screenshots to the worlds she has been to. There is a wolrd for every climate and georgaphy and plenty of variety. Everything I have seen of nGW has been really dark btw.
Originally posted by Nephthys
And no, I said that its not as important as art design,
That's your opinion. As I said sometime art design needs good graphics to look good. Something can have amazing concept art but if the graphics are shit it will look nothing like it. Graphics on the other hand doesn;t need good art. They can just base it on real world realism and with good graphics it will look good.
