Batman vs. John McClane

Started by Rogue Jedi55 pages

Originally posted by Robtard
He did just that, in Batman Begins. In case you didn't know.
Thats where I got it from.

See, guys like McClane, Riggs, Swagger, Mills, they take their punishment, escape and deal with it on their own, and pwn. No backup like Batman. AND no armor. Hell, even Murtaugh got shot and kept going, killing the Colonel.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Thats where I got it from.

See, guys like McClane, Riggs, Swagger, Mills, they take their punishment, escape and deal with it on their own, and pwn. No backup like Batman. AND no armor. Hell, even Murtaugh got shot and kept going, killing the Colonel.


that's good for them

Here's a scenario. Bruce Wayne is in nakatomi plaza when the terrorists attack. He has no armor and no Bat gadgets. Does he clear?

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Here's a scenario. Bruce Wayne is in nakatomi plaza when the terrorists attack. He has no armor and no Bat gadgets. Does he clear?

I'm about to read ur thread and find out...

He cant.

u really hate bats don't u

No. Why do you say that? As I said MANY times before, I like the character, I hate the way he is depicted.

u no i'm too lazy to read..

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
No. Why do you say that? As I said MANY times before, I like the character, I hate the way he is depicted.

What, you have a problem with the troubled, dark and crazy type of hero?

Nah, just that he is able to avoid being shot so damn easy.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Also, McClane took FAR more punishment in DH1 than Batman did in BB.

Is that....supposed to be an argument for McClane?

Originally posted by Robtard
It's "lighty armoured", so that would stop small arms fire, at best, probably just for strikes and the occasional brick to the head though.

The face area isn't at all, unless your "he's wins because he's the god damn Batman" batboyism has you believing Batman can catch bullets with his teeth.

Cowl = the helmet thing bro.

Remember the scene where Alfred smashes it with a mallet and it shatters? The cowl was bulletproof, but was susceptible to blunt trauma.

They got a new one = straight up bullet proof, hammer proof.

BYANG.

I like that batboyism though. That was a pretty solid thing to call me. I GUESS you can resort to name-calling if you start to realize that you are fighting a losing battle.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
He can TRY all he likes, he will NOT avoid the bullets.

Hwah? And Hwwy not?

YouTube video

Looks like he's avoiding being shot in this scene, by a guy weilding a pretty similar automatic weapon as given to Mac.

At one point he's a cross the docks...and then in 2 seconds he's hanging upside down from behind a guy.

If you don't think that's fast, you are retarded - and won't see reason.

Originally posted by Quincy
Is that....supposed to be an argument for McClane?

Cowl = the helmet thing bro.

Remember the scene where Alfred smashes it with a mallet and it shatters? The cowl was bulletproof, but was susceptible to blunt trauma.

They got a new one = straight up bullet proof, hammer proof.

BYANG.

I like that batboyism though. That was a pretty solid thing to call me. I GUESS you can resort to name-calling if you start to realize that you are fighting a losing battle.

Hwah? And Hwwy not?

YouTube video

Looks like he's avoiding being shot in this scene, by a guy weilding a pretty similar automatic weapon as given to Mac.

At one point he's a cross the docks...and then in 2 seconds he's hanging upside down from behind a guy.

If you don't think that's fast, you are retarded - and won't see reason.


😄

Originally posted by Quincy

Cowl = the helmet thing bro.

Remember the scene where Alfred smashes it with a mallet and it shatters? The cowl was bulletproof, but was susceptible to blunt trauma.

They got a new one = straight up bullet proof, hammer proof.

BYANG.

I like that batboyism though. That was a pretty solid thing to call me. I GUESS you can resort to name-calling if you start to realize that you are fighting a losing battle.

Yes, and that's the thing that's "lightly armoured." Being hammer proof doesn't equal bullet proof. A football helmet can take a hammer strike; it's not stopping a bullet though, bro.

It was straight up solid; glad you enjoyed it. Here, I'll do it again, just for you. Your batboyism is causing you to argue from the "it's Batman, he always wins" angle.

Now how can I lose a battle I've both already won and not committed myself to? If you recall, I never said "McClane wins; he wins in 2 seconds". I'm just here to dispel the silly batboyism that runs rampant in most Batman Vs Anything threads.

Originally posted by Quincy
Is that....supposed to be an argument for McClane?
Mhm. It shows he can take far more punishment than Batman.

LOL at Batboyism haermm

Maybe McClane will need to take in a series of young boys, dressing them in a rubber nipple suits and allowing those children to endanger their lives nightly, before he'll get respect from the batfans.

Originally posted by Robtard
Yes, and that's the thing that's "lightly armoured." Being hammer proof doesn't equal bullet proof. A football helmet can take a hammer strike; it's not stopping a bullet though, bro.

It was straight up solid; glad you enjoyed it. Here, I'll do it again, just for you. Your batboyism is causing you to argue from the "it's Batman, he always wins" angle.

Now how can I lose a battle I've both already won and not committed myself to? If you recall, I never said "McClane wins; he wins in 2 seconds". I'm just here to dispel the silly batboyism that runs rampant in most Batman Vs Anything threads.

Err...eh...bro...in this case it does.

That scene was letting you know that it was Bulletproof. That's what the point of that was. I wasn't using some weird logic to say that hammers=bullets. that just wouldn't make sense.

And I don't know where you are getting this "always wins" sort of thing. I just know he could wreck John McClane - just some cop with a gun.

The warehouse scene shows he's quick enough to avoid gunfire, and sneak up on opponents in a matter of seconds. Has McClane shown such speed feats? I haven't seen you say anything like that, since all I'm getting from you guys is name calling and RJ posting youtube videos of rap songs.

I don't quite get that rap song argument mhmm but hell, maybe I'm just stoned?

I'm sort of flabbergasted that I would be accused of always claiming that Batman wins, since it's coming from McClane's Right and Left one.

"Just some cop with a gun" lolz

"Just some cop with a gun (and an inordinate amount of Luck and skill in combat) would murder "just a nutter in a mask"
were they to face off in your great "reductionist assessment" battle.

A response from McClane's left and right fists is exactly what is appropriate when Batman's leathery little one is trying to be urinating on the good name of an honest, hardworking cop.

Reduction Assessment - Elaborate.

I don't get it man. What specifically can you not understand Girthy?

K - has McClane ever taken out entire group of people unarmed while they weilded guns? Like, essentially just jumped them and kicked all of their asses?

^That's not a sarcastic point proving question - that's legitimite. Because Batman has. And if McClane hasn't, then you can't call him in on par with Batman's level of skill.

And that's not my Batboyism talking - that's actual sense.

RJ is an idiot.

Originally posted by Quincy

I don't quite get that rap song argument mhmm but hell, maybe I'm just stoned?

It means Mac would put a hole in Bats head, in his mother****in head.