Originally posted by NemeBro
McClane won't be able to get a bead on Batman and shoot him before he is out of sight.
This assumes Batman can literally dodge bullets [starting] from a non-hidden position that are fired from both a machine-gun and a guy that isn't very far away.
I don't think Begins ever showed this capability. Do you have a movie feat that says otherwise?
Haha 44 pages of meaningless "debate". I'm pretty sure this McClane worship started out as a joke, but repeat something long enough and people will start accepting it as fact.
People with sense that think Batman would win should just let this topic die. Answering them gives some sort of illusion that there is any credibility to this debate.
It's also unjustifiably elevating McClane's status with every thread. Pretty soon, according to them, it would be a fair view that McClane could take on Bourne or someone like that. I'm already seeing the signs (e.g. RJ describing McClane's resourcefulness similarly to what Bourne is known to be).
Originally posted by Placidity
Haha 44 pages of meaningless "debate". I'm pretty sure this McClane worship started out as a joke, but repeat something long enough and people will start accepting it as fact.People with sense that think Batman would win should just let this topic die. Answering them gives some sort of illusion that there is any credibility to this debate.
It's also unjustifiably elevating McClane's status with every thread. Pretty soon, according to them, it would be a fair view that McClane could take on Bourne or someone like that. I'm already seeing the signs (e.g. RJ describing McClane's resourcefulness similarly to what Bourne is known to be).
Originally posted by Placidity
Haha 44 pages of meaningless "debate". I'm pretty sure this McClane worship started out as a joke, but repeat something long enough and people will start accepting it as fact.People with sense that think Batman would win should just let this topic die. Answering them gives some sort of illusion that there is any credibility to this debate.
It's also unjustifiably elevating McClane's status with every thread. Pretty soon, according to them, it would be a fair view that McClane could take on Bourne or someone like that. I'm already seeing the signs (e.g. RJ describing McClane's resourcefulness similarly to what Bourne is known to be).
Strong in this one, the McHatred is, yes.
BTW, McClane won that fight too, ninja-girl died, horribly.
Originally posted by Scythe
No matter how we see it, one combatant has to be drastically gimped, that sucks.If Batman is allowed to roam the building unnoticed, McClane is done for.
If McClane sees Batman right away, and since he has his gun already trained and ready to fire on McClane like most are saying, Batman has no chance.
Batman has a chance... Since McClane "is only only advancing toward Batman and is also preoccupied talking with
Hans"
Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Not on his face.And Wayne sustains damage to the body, despite the armour.
the whole batsuit is bulletproof... just because the cowl breaks after a hammer hits it doesn't mean a bullet will break it.... Yes Bruce gets injured but he has a very resiliency to pain
Originally posted by PlacidityThats Sadako and Rob, I only stated that he was badass with a gun. 🙄
Haha 44 pages of meaningless "debate". I'm pretty sure this McClane worship started out as a joke, but repeat something long enough and people will start accepting it as fact.People with sense that think Batman would win should just let this topic die. Answering them gives some sort of illusion that there is any credibility to this debate.
It's also unjustifiably elevating McClane's status with every thread. Pretty soon, according to them, it would be a fair view that McClane could take on Bourne or someone like that. I'm already seeing the signs (e.g. RJ describing McClane's resourcefulness similarly to what Bourne is known to be).
Originally posted by Placidity
Haha 44 pages of meaningless "debate". I'm pretty sure this McClane worship started out as a joke, but repeat something long enough and people will start accepting it as fact.People with sense that think Batman would win should just let this topic die. Answering them gives some sort of illusion that there is any credibility to this debate.
It's also unjustifiably elevating McClane's status with every thread. Pretty soon, according to them, it would be a fair view that McClane could take on Bourne or someone like that. I'm already seeing the signs (e.g. RJ describing McClane's resourcefulness similarly to what Bourne is known to be).
Yes. Your mass debating prowess here has be of the same standard you berate.
Agreed here: "People with sense that think Batman would win should just let this topic die. Answering them gives some sort of illusion that there is any credibility to this debate." although for different reasons that you suspect.
On your lastpoint, thats just numpty-like reasoning. 🙂
Originally posted by Sadako of GirthNo, I agree with you on his resourcefulness, I was just stating that I never brought it up, that his badassery with a gun was all that he needs here.
Absolutely. Some very queer logic, RJ.
Bob Swagger
John Rambo
Bryan Mills
JasonBourne
SEU Smith
Plissken
Wesley Gibson
John Preston
Martin Riggs
El Wray
El Mariachi
These are all men, in addition to Mac, who pwn Batman if they have a gun.
OK kiddies, math time.
Speed of sound = 1,125 feet per second.
An H&K MP-5 has a muzzle velocity of 1,312 feet per second.
Gee whiz, it fires FASTER than the speed of sound!!!
The HK bullet reaches Batman in .0152 seconds.
THIRTY OF THEM.
This is the part where Dadudemon comes in and gets all Mr. Wizard on me haermm I love that guy.