Originally posted by Wolverine2179
You get owned, yet you come back for more, desperate to win an argument to boost your already bad reputation?
"you get owned"? According to who? You? You aren't even participating in the argument, so if you think that I'm wrong then feel free to post a rebuttal to my arguments.
Originally posted by HewhoknowsallYes, according to me, according to common sense.
"you get owned"? According to who? You? You aren't even participating in the argument, so if you think that I'm wrong then feel free to post a rebuttal to my arguments.
My rebuttal would be....
You know I'd honestly tell you that you are not stupid but the problem is you give the impression to people that your an idiot when your not
Originally posted by Darth Subjekt
I suggest you revisit that. It was flying, and he caused it to fall down and go boom. What did Kota say? I think it was something like, "Rip that star destroyer out of the sky!"hmmm...
Nope, TFU Pg. 224-226 The ship is falling away from th space station, without power, and is going to fall on him.
What Kota says is: "That Star Destroyer is coming down fast. You'll never get clear in time. You need to pull it into the cannon."
I don't have time to post the whole thing right now, but look it up. I'm not lying to you. 😄
Also, wasn't saying it wasn't impressive, just not AS impressive as pulling one down that is flying by with power.
Originally posted by ~:Mr.Anderson:~
Really? Those are all games, one is a flechette cannon, the other is a "Shotgun" but the pellets are visible and very slow moving. Nothing anywhere near a gunpowder shotgun's velocity. I wouldn't say they were comparable weapons. The only similarity is their tendency to shoot in a spread shot formation.
and jedi are unable to block all of those weapons thus proving my point.
and youre seriously splitting hairs at this point.
Originally posted by ~:Mr.Anderson:~
I keep asking which jedi masters? They were probably pretty lame in comparison to most jedi masters you would find in the prime of the jedi.
They were two Jedi masters who were confirmed to be weaker than Assajji Ventress.
There is a quote. (I don't have it yet, my laptop died, so i haven't downloaded those sources yet) where it is confirmed that Asaaji was better than the guy. He says it himself.
So definilty not top tier jedi masters, but we can assume they were at least average jedi masters. NOthing is said to make it seem like they sucked that bad.
These were ASSASSIN droids anyway.
JK droids I believe, which were a completely different animals than your average confedaracy droid. In... some clone-war book, i can't remember right now the title? Kit Fisto was almost killed by one of those droids in one-on-one combat.
So it isn't horrible that they lost to 6.
Originally posted by truejedimeh assaji has failed constantly since her conception.
They were two Jedi masters who were confirmed to be weaker than Assajji Ventress.There is a quote. (I don't have it yet, my laptop died, so i haven't downloaded those sources yet) where it is confirmed that Asaaji was better than the guy. He says it himself.
So definilty not top tier jedi masters, but we can assume they were at least average jedi masters. NOthing is said to make it seem like they sucked that bad.
These were ASSASSIN droids anyway.
JK droids I believe, which were a completely different animals than your average confedaracy droid. In... some clone-war book, i can't remember right now the title? Kit Fisto was almost killed by one of those droids in one-on-one combat.
So it isn't horrible that they lost to 6.
Also these "shotgun bearing droids" were obviously excessively skilled
Originally posted by HewhoknowsallAnd how am i going to give you a rebuttal when i'm not even arguing with you in the first place?
I mean actually rebuttal my arguments. Why are you refusing to do so? You're arguing around it, trying to come up with stalling methods in order to NOT have to argue it.Which means that you can't. How to prove me wrong? Actually respond to my arguments.
Do you actually want to prove to people that your a blatant idiot?
My rebuttal would be to ask you to shut the f*ck up because no body here takes you seriously and everytime you type, your intelligence goes down and idiocy increases.
Originally posted by Wolverine2179
And how am i going to give you a rebuttal when i'm not even arguing with you in the first place?Do you actually want to prove to people that your a blatant idiot?
My rebuttal would be to ask you to shut the f*ck up because no body here takes you seriously and everytime you type, your intelligence goes down and idiocy increases.
If you aren't willing to prove that I'm wrong, then stop making claims WITHOUT SUPPORTING THEM! Just saying that I'm wrong isn't enough. You could say anything, but you're obviously trying to avoid answering me. Why are you so reluctant to respond? How come you refuse to do so? Yes, I want you to try to "prove" to people that I'm a blatant idiot. Try countering my arguments. Go ahead and try. If not, then f*ck off, because you're obviously incapable of debating.
Originally posted by truejedi
can I jump in here real quick HWKA?What has your opponents claimed that you disagree with? And what point are you supporting? (to save me 10 pages of reading to catch up!)
Well, Wolverine hasn't actually argued anything or taken any side at all in this thread. He just says "you're an idiot" but has yet to respond to anyone's arguments.
Advent and I, and earlier Ms. Marvel and I were debating about if the NJO can take the 501st (note that it doesn't have to be all at once, it's across a planet, so guerrilla warfare is applicable). I say that if the jedi fight smart, they can win. The other two said that the 501st wins. Unfortunately, neither Advent nor Ms. Marvel have responded to my most recent arguments - not saying that they have to or anything.