Originally posted by Robtard
I said "he [47] can hit him [Swagger] at over twice the distance, while being out of Swagger's kill range." This is a fact going by screen feats, 2.48 miles Vs about 1So considering what I said has no bearing on what you said and are saying now, you're trolling me. Stop.
More lying?
Stop it.
Originally posted by Robtard
By screen feats, 47 is the better sniper. /the end
Originally posted by Robtard
You're assuming it was all superior tech and had nothing to do with 47's training, which was (the training) mentioned and shown to be above normal in the film. It can just as easily (and would follow the screen feats rule) be argued that his skill is so insanely high (see fictional), that he was able to make the shot, no matter how out of reality it was.This is why your argument is BS.
Originally posted by Robtard
LoL, no, Swagger clearly said that a mile shot is nearly impossible, as there's so many factors to compenstate for. So he couldn't make a 2mile, going by his screen feats.Yet 47 made a shot with a sniper Swagger couldn't. So 47 is the better sniper. Amazing, that.
See above, going by screen feats, he makes a shot Swagger couldn't. 47's better.
Originally posted by Robtard
No, not by Swagger's screen feats.No, 47's the better sniper, he's has super-human skill with it,
Originally posted by Robtard
Yet when it comes to sniping, 47 can make a shot Swagger couldn't, about twice Swagger's range, so 47 is the better sniper, going by screen feats.
Originally posted by Robtard
Repeat: Yet 47 made a sniper shot that is well beyond Swagger's abilities, 47 is the better sniper, going by screen feats.
Originally posted by Robtard
47 is shown making a sniper shot that would be impossible for Swagger to make...47's the better sniper. /the end
Not only has what I said HAD bearing, it was extremely relevant to everything you were saying. You continue to ignore what was seen on screen and continue to erroneously ignore the fact that technology is a huge factor in making that shot. That is deliberately ignoring what was seen on screen, and exactly what Imp said to stop doing.
More on topic, can you prove that Agent 47's skill is superior to Swagger's, when it comes to sniping? (Going by screen feats, Swagger is superior, at the least.) Put the same high powered gun and bullets into Swagger's hands, and tell me if he can or cannot make the same shot.
Going by what we've seen on screen, Swagger could, and with much better accuracy considering all the things he accounts for in his shots. Agent 47 didn't even make an acknowledgment for all of those factors as it wasn't even necessary with his gun.
In fact, I'd say Agent 47 could make a MUCH longer shot, considering the travel time of the bullet and how powerful his scope was. We don't know if Agent 47 is as highly skilled as Swagger is when it comes to sniping, but we do know tha Swagger displayed more sniping related skills on-screen.
Let's recap:
You've made a baseless claim for pages that Agent 47 is more skilled. You haven't proven why. You've dismissed the technology seen on screen, which is paramount to having made that shot. You continue to ignore it and are calling others trolls when they bring it up. You've dodged and used strawman arguments repeatedly. Finally, you've ignored a warning by Imp to stop ignoring what was seen on screen.
Originally posted by Robtard
2.48 miles Vs about 1 mile. /the endEdit: Considering your request, okay, let's end it. No PMing needed. It's stupid to take out 47 though, as he's an assassin, Swagger isn't.
You mean "targeted-killing", right?
Yeah, that's assassination. A sniper IS an assassin. They just call it "target-killing."
Cheery-picking quotes didn't help you disprove that your response had no bearing to what I was saying at the previous particular moment. It didn't, your response was non sequitur.
This doesn't matter to you of course, as your sole purpose here is to troll me, by falsely calling me a "liar". Have fun, as repeatedly asking you to stop is futile.
Originally posted by Robtard
Cheery-picking quotes didn't help you disprove that your response had no bearing to what I was saying at the previous particular moment. It didn't, it was non sequitur.
It's quite clear to everyone reading that you totally ignored everything I just posted.
Originally posted by Robtard
This doesn't matter to you of course, as your sole purpose here is to troll me, by falsely calling me a "liar". Have fun, as repeatedly asking you to stop is futile.
So, in other words, you ignore the solid logic presented in my post, again, and pretend you didn't try to lie for a 3rd time. Yet, I'm the one trolling.
Originally posted by dadudemon
It's quite clear to everyone reading that you totally ignored everything I just posted.So, in other words, you ignore the solid logic presented in my post, again, and pretend you didn't try to lie for a 3rd time.
Yet, I'm the one trolling.
Yes, you're trolling me. That is correct.
Would me adding the word "pretty" in front of "please stop" make you stop this time around? Let me know; I'll do it.
Originally posted by Robtard
Yes, you're trolling me. That is correct.Would me adding the word "pretty" in front of "please stop" make you stop this time around? Let me know; I'll do it.
No, you're trolling me. You know it. I know it. Others reading know it. Unlike you, I'm actually serious.
If you think I'm trolling so much, then you could actually address the completely on topic points towards the end of my post. Of couse, you won't, and will continue to not do it because you are trolling and calling others a troll.
Originally posted by dadudemon
No, you're trolling me. You know it. I know it. Others reading know it. Unlike you, I'm actually serious.If you think I'm trolling so much, then you could actually address the completely on topic points towards the end of my post. Of couse, you won't, and will continue to not do it because you are trolling and calling others a troll.
I'm not. I don't. You don't. They don't. Exactly, I'm not known for trolling, you've admitted to doing so, for fun. Hmmm?
Addressing a person who's trolling on topic is pointless. If only begets more trolling, as you've shown. Watch. Retry: You claim "screen-feats", yet going by screen-feats, 47 could hit Swagger in the face from 1.5 times the distance of Swagger's max. It's 2.48miles Vs about 1 mile. This should be the end of it.
Originally posted by Robtard
No. No. No. They don't. Exactly, I'm not known for trolling, you've admitted to doing so, for fun.
Yes. Yes. Yes. They do.
Show me where I admitted to trolling for fun. That's just retarded. 😐
And, "not known for trolling" is very much incorrect. You're either in denial or trolling yet again.
Originally posted by Robtard
Addressing a person who's trolling on topic is pointless.
I wonder why I keep responding to you, then? I think it's because I known you for far to long and I'm being too forgiving....HOPING that you'll eventually address the thread properly instead of dodging, trolling, and using strawman arguments.
Originally posted by Robtard
If only begets more trolling, as you've shown. Watch.
Indeed. Most of your post is more trolling and failing to actually address the thread. So, I guess we can take this to mean you're actually admitting to having trolled me the entire time?
Originally posted by Robtard
Retry: You claim "screen-feats", yet going by screen-feats, 47 could hit Swagger in the face from 1.5 times the distance of Swagger's max. It's 2.48miles Vs about 1 mile. This should be the end of it.
You still continue to ignore what was seen on screen. No where does your post address anything I've recently stated. No.Where. In fact, it's just a rehash of everything I said you were doing wrong.