Originally posted by -Pr-
Writer interviews are allowed when they add to or back up what's on panel. When they contradict it. that's the conflict.
Considering most writer interviews are apologist in nature and the scenes in question already could go either way, insisting some random writer interview (that we haven't even been given a link to) automatically cements one position in the extreme is, quite frankly, bullsh1t. Really. It's bullsh1t.
But go ahead and show me instances where Superman wasn't even remotely operating near his best throughout the final Wonder Woman fight. Or any fight he had under Maxwell Lord's control for that matter, so this random writer interview -- that suddenly is admissible -- can back up what you're saying.
Originally posted by -Pr-
Superman's best is better than we saw during Sacrifice. His best feats all involve him not just out-punching, but out-thinking his opponents.
Superman was out-thinking his opponents throughout
Sacrifice under Maxwell Lord's mental tampering. J'onn actually states it outloud and we see it multiple times. But your dillemma may lie in the fact that you only ever think Superman can ever fight at his best or near his best if he fights purely strategically instead of just cutting loose with his full power. And since you said before that he wasn't operating
remotely at his best, you think that just cutting loose with his full power with a direct assault causes him to perform waaaaay below his best. In which case, prove that.
Because I think that's 100% wrong. And I am prepared to prove so.
Originally posted by -Pr-
Unless his best somehow dipped dramatically for a second, the more likely scenario is that his mental condition being so out of sorts is what put him at a disadvantage.
You said he wasn't even
remotely at his best, so if you want to scale back that position, and say he was just at a disadvantage, just say it. Because then we can discuss how Wonder Woman was at a disadvantage by holding back, trying to get to Maxwell Lord, and fighting him near the Sun and analyze how that all balances out. Unless we want to conveniently ignore looking at it from both sides fairly.
Originally posted by -Pr-
I don't need to re-read Sacrifice. I've read it far more than I want to already.How Superman acted when he was trying to kill Batman was different to how he acted when he fought the League. It was different to how he fought Lord, because Lord kept changing things up.
You seem to be confusing the battle against the Justice League with his assaults on Batman and Wonder Woman. So maybe you do need to re-read it as nothing I've posted even references his fight against the Justice League... yet you keep bringing it up???
Actually, what I posted was to prove that Superman was fighting to kill with grief/revenge against Batman and Wonder Woman. And he thought he was fighting a supervillain like Braniac, Darkseid or Doomsday who had murdered his wife and/or friends. Which is why they were exactly the same scenarios. And Wonder Woman was involved in both. And on-panel, a character actually analyzes the first fight and concludes Superman was acting "strategic[ally]," sometimes "brilliant[ly]." Which is true when you actually look at what he does in each of the fights. Which is basically the exact opposite of what you're trying to insist.