Originally posted by bluewaterrider
There are actually several reasons, and, having had some experience on other message boards, I know what many of them are.One is that, for whatever reason, forums are set up for "groupthink" discussions. Dissenting opinions are treated as affronts.
The problem here is you're arguing an unsubstantiated opinion. Most of the points you've presented aren't accepted as evidence.
Originally posted by bluewaterrider
A second is that people are remarkably un-informed about a lot of subject matter you might otherwise THINK they would know when they participate in discussions of this sort.
I've asked it before. Where are the examples? You say you don't have a lot of time, but you spend more time trying to gather evidence to refute peoples' examples than you actually spend providing your own examples. If you're actually correct that Wonder Woman is stronger, your lacking examples can't be because it's "unfair" that Superman has more appearances. If the proof exists, you should be able to provide clear and decisive examples. I can prove that Gladiator is stronger than Batman despite Batman's far greater number of appearances, giving him way more feats and fights to choose from. You might consider that an extreme example, but it perfectly illustrates my point.
Originally posted by bluewaterrider
A third is that people do not actually read or pay attention to what the people they're responding to actually post.I've caught even P.R. on this last once or twice.
Actually, to return to the first for a moment, the hostility and language tricks used remind me of the following. Note that the entire clip below is about 12 minutes.
Only the first 2 minutes are what I'm thinking of, so DON'T bother with anything after that.
Again, only the FIRST 2 minutes should be viewed, so don't be boring and predictable and claim to watch the whole 12 minute affair when you're being expressly asked to watch only the first 120 seconds.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DmEE61iVhCA
Bill Whittle on Palin Haters
ummmmm Why did you tell me not to be "boring and predictable" and "claim to watch the whole 12 minute affair?" What exactly was the point there?
But, are you trying to argue that all I have is accusations to try and discredit you? That would be incorrect. Who's the one who's actually posted evidence? Me, not you. I don't need to make false accusations to try and discredit you. All I need to do to discredit you is point-out the things you've actually said. For example, you try to make it like it's evidence that Diana is stronger because in AOS #642, he was unable to break her choking him, and he had to resort to damaging the Watchtower. Yet, he's thinking he's fighting Ruin and is completely unaware of what's actually going on. He wasn't even aware Diana was there until she directly engaged him physically, even when she was literally right in front of him. She also was choking him with indestructible garrote.
If you don't know what garrote is--
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garrote
Here's the scene.
http://s1199.photobucket.com/albums/aa466/Delta1938/Nearly%20Kills%20Batman/?action=view¤t=P00007.jpg
http://s1199.photobucket.com/albums/aa466/Delta1938/Nearly%20Kills%20Batman/?action=view¤t=P00008.jpg
Not exactly the best argument. Or the "Knee Before Lord" argument you made in regards to WONDER WOMAN #219? Yeah, that's a decent argument. If you ignore what happened in ADVENTURES OF SUPERMAN #642. Here's the full scene from the two comics.
http://s1199.photobucket.com/albums/aa466/Delta1938/Strength/Overpowers%20Diana/
You look at the first page when he starts restraining her, she's clearly making an effort not to be overpowered. All your explanation does is explain why she isn't trying to escape, not how she was in the first place. And perhaps she didn't try to escape, because she knew it was futile? That she couldn't overpower him?
I'll jump back a little, to where you claim he waited for her to leave before engaging the JLA, that it's evidence that she's stronger. No, it's not. I pointed-out that she was taking the critically injured Batman for medical attention.
http://s1199.photobucket.com/albums/aa466/Delta1938/Superman%20VS%20Teams/AOS%20642/?action=view¤t=P00014.jpg
And she was. But if you pay attention to the narration boxes, you'll note Superman thinks about the question nobody brought-up, that if he's being controlled, then they could be controlled as well. And he comes to believe this at the end. As the last narration box up there, and the first in the following show.
http://s1199.photobucket.com/albums/aa466/Delta1938/Superman%20VS%20Teams/AOS%20642/?action=view¤t=P00015.jpg
So, no, you cannot use this as evidence that Wonder Woman is stronger, unless you lie. I proved it was not fear or concern for her strength. And another example? Your comparison of the Omacs. I don't think I've seen you post Wonder Woman dealing with the Omacs, but I have seen Fangirl101(banned here, but seen her post on a site I used to frequent when it was up) post an example of Wonder Woman VS Omacs, that she claims is proof that Diana's stronger than Supergirl. Maybe Diana is stronger, but it sure as Hell isn't from the example Fangirl posts. All that happens is 4 or so pile on top of Diana. But, they don't actually grab her to try to restrain her. So, her throwing them off is really just throwing the weight of the Omacs off her, not overpowering them. Batman has better feats than that.
You made reference about Supergirl not doing well against them, if I recall correctly(I KNOW you brought her up and compared her to Superman, since you think she's stronger than him), and Fangirl posts just the part where Kara's being restrained. Here's the full thing.
http://s1199.photobucket.com/albums/aa466/Delta1938/VS%20Omacs/Supergirl/
Note that the last two panels on the first page, she's being restrained by two actually grabbing her arms. It's hard to tell, but the next panel looks like she's freed herself. She most certainly has freed herself by the next page.
And while I don't know where the example you gave of Superman "doing poorly" against the Omacs are from, I only saw one panel. Where he was being attacked, and we don't even know what the circumstances were. Not exactly a good argument, especially since A: you've repeatedly argued that durability isn't strength, and B: to my knowledge you hadn't actually shown Wonder Woman facing Omacs. Here's how Superman did against an Omac when he thought they were just machines, unaware there were people inside them.
http://s1199.photobucket.com/albums/aa466/Delta1938/VS%20Omacs/AOS%20643/
It's not much of a fight when he grabs a hold of one, is it? No, no it's not. He relatively casually one-shots one, nearly killing the person inside it. I wouldn't be surprised at all if Superman's "poor performance" you showed a single panel of was due to fear of harming the innocents in them, instead of actually not being strong enough to deal with them.
These examples are a lot more harmful than anything I could "make up." Either you're being misleading with them, or your bias has really clouded your judgment.
Originally posted by bluewaterrider
It says that Superman was hurt by Darkseid's POST-Omega-Force-spent energy attack BECAUSE it was attuned to his precise molecular structure.Darkseid says that right in those pictures.
Exactly what about that scene are you having such a difficult time understanding?
Nothing. I just assumed you'd get the point. Here's the thing. You sure give the appearance that you're arguing Superman beat-up Darksied in that encounter, because Darkseid was hurt by the Omega Beams. Well, Superman was being hurt by Darkseid's energy attacked attuned to his molecular structure. But, Darkseid didn't just blast him and be done with it. He only stopped attacking because Superman punched him in the face.
http://s1199.photobucket.com/albums/aa466/Delta1938/Superman%20VS%20Darkseid/AC%20586/?action=view¤t=smos-204.jpg
http://s1199.photobucket.com/albums/aa466/Delta1938/Superman%20VS%20Darkseid/AC%20586/?action=view¤t=smos-205.jpg
If you check the top panel of the second page, you see Darkseid's actually still firing the energy beams, just not at Superman anymore. 'Cuz he was hit in the face. So, Superman started the beat-down even while he was taking punishment. So, by your argument, Superman was still being weakened when he started his beat-down. Why didn't you catch that?
(TO BE CONTINUED)