NJO Luke vs RoT Bane

Started by Gideon16 pages

"Palpatine knew he must begin at once to gain control over the dark side. With the resources of the galaxy at his disposal, he gathered the greatest works of knowledge from over a million worlds. He studied the Force in all its guises throughout the galaxy, whether it was the shamanism of the Jarvashqiine or the tales of the Tyia. Coupled with perversions of the secrets he ripped from the living minds of the Jedi he captured during the Purge, he learned more than he ever expected." (the Dark Empire Sourcebook, page 67)

He didn't necessarily study them all, let alone master. He simply gathered them. Which is perfectly reasonable, given his status and resources.

Originally posted by Gideon
"Palpatine knew he must begin at once to gain control over the dark side. With the resources of the galaxy at his disposal, he [b]gathered the greatest works of knowledge from over a million worlds. He studied the Force in all its guises throughout the galaxy, whether it was the shamanism of the Jarvashqiine or the tales of the Tyia. Coupled with perversions of the secrets he ripped from the living minds of the Jedi he captured during the Purge, he learned more than he ever expected." (the Dark Empire Sourcebook, page 67)

He didn't necessarily study them all, let alone master. He simply gathered them. Which is perfectly reasonable, given his status and resources. [/B]

You've used that quote before in a more flattering fashion towards Sidious. You made a direct line to how Force prodigies learn exceptionally fast (citing Bane as as an example) making the argument that it was feasible for Sidious to have learned the majority of the techniques he plundered since that was almost all he did for some thirty odd years.

I am pointing out how most of it would have been useless.

This isn't particularly relevant, but I'll bite.

Autokrat
You've used that quote before in a more flattering fashion towards Sidious.

It is flattering towards Sidious. The entire point is that he has access to a far greater wealth of knowledge than any Sith before or since.

Autokrat
You made a direct line to how Force prodigies learn exceptionally fast (citing Bane as as an example) making the argument that it was feasible for Sidious to have learned the majority of the techniques he plundered since that was almost all he did for some thirty odd years.

We know from the Rise of Darth Vader that Sidious does not sleep at all; we also know from multiple sources, including the Ultimate Visual Guide, that he rarely leaves the Imperial Palace and "thoroughly dedicat[ed] himself to the study of the dark side of the Force."

He's clearly a genius, with an intellect surpassing Bane's and others, as well as a prodigious Force-user. With all of that time, yes, he could have learned a hell of a lot.

There's not much of a contradiction here, but you can keep looking for one if you'd like.

Autokrat
I am pointing out how most of it would have been useless.

How so?

He's clearly a genius, with an intellect surpassing Bane's

prove it please

Lavos
He's clearly a genius, with an intellect surpassing Bane's

prove it please

You did that yourself, sport.

Do I believe in Hyperbole in literature? You insult me. If that is the tone you want this conversation to take, so be it.:

The quote is very clearly stated as fact.

It is not a hyperbole: , examples of hyperbole's follow, so you can see the difference. I got your back.


These books weigh a ton. (These books are heavy.)
The path went on forever. (The path was very long.)
I'm doing a million things right now. (I'm busy.)
I waited centuries for you. (I waited a long time for you.)
It took forever to get here. (It took a long time to get here.)
She ran quicker than a bullet. (She ran fast.)
Hyperbole is the greatest ever! (Hyperbole is good.)

Denning gave us a very specific statement with quantifiable forces. He said nothing existed that could move Luke. He even gave an example of something that couldn't. It was not hyperbole.

The game you are playing is not particularly troublesome, since two days ago you didn't realize that GL's own words are canon, but I can help you again, that is what friends are for.

Quotes about characters from out of universe sources (authors)are generally considered canon unless directly contradicted by a higher source of canon.

In this case, we have just such a quote. It is canon, whether you choose to believe it or not.

Your question about hyperbole was a BIT ridiculous. The only thing you needed to ask was if THIS was hyperbole, and it is not.

TJ
The game you are playing is not particularly troublesome,

You seem to be having trouble with it.

TJ
since two days ago you didn't realize that GL's own words are canon,

😐

Because it's not like standing EU canonizes things that contradict what George Lucas has explicitly said, right?

/sarcasm

I took into account the fact that the EU has several things canonized that defies Lucas's vision -- off the top of my head, Luke's marriage, post-Endor Sith, and the Emperor's clones -- and consulted the standing canon guide and lo and behold, I found nothing that said George Lucas's statements were canon.

I confronted you all with this and it took about a dozen posts before you finally found something to contradict it.

And what happened? I accepted it and moved on.

Speaking of accepting and moving on, are you sure you're really not still troubled with this?

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=527149&pagenumber=3

^ That's the thread in which you made an embarrassing contention, were corrected by me, continued to argue against it, made to look like an ass, and then called out on it by others who were completely uninvolved in the argument?

Spoiler:
The moral of the story is that I was clearly wrong in the situation about George's opinion, but when I was confronted with evidence, I conceded. You, on the other hand, were made a fool out of an an even less significant issue and stubbornly refused to relent. Let's not get into "LAWL ur wrong" because I've already won that round.
TJ
but I can help you again, that is what friends are for.

😱

And I'm glad I could be of service!

TJ
Quotes about characters from out of universe sources (authors)are generally considered canon unless directly contradicted by a higher source of canon.

But... there is contradiction.

While I don't find your stance completely unreasonable TJ:

[Luke could not be moved. (Luke could not easily be moved.)]

...Just saying.

I'm beginning to see the problem here. All of us are trying to apply logic to what is essentially, a collection of stories by different authors with different writing styles and ideas of how characters think and act.

On one hand we have Luke struggling against a Destroyer Droid while on another hand we have Luke apparently giving the bird to the gravitational pull of a Supermassive Black hole.

However, Luke never does this again even though he apparently can.

The only solution is to try and find a "mean" and find the most consistent explanation for his aggregate behavior and power.

Autokrat
I'm beginning to see the problem here. All of us are trying to apply logic to what is essentially, a collection of stories by different authors with different writing styles and ideas of how characters think and act.

On one hand we have Luke struggling against a Destroyer Droid while on another hand we have Luke apparently giving the bird to the gravitational pull of a Supermassive Black hole.

No, I can tolerate some contradiction. My problem is illustrated by the example you provided: the enormous disparity between Luke at certain points.

How could Luke I-Manipulate-Dovin-Basals-And-Can-Root-Myself-So-Deep-In-the-Force-That-I-Can-Resist-Black-Holes Skywalker seem so pathetic in subsequent encounters? Where are these powers elsewhere? Hell, even in Backlash, Luke's telekinesis is resisted by a no-name member of the Tribe of the Sith.

And this is after he'd recovered from his endeavor in the Maw.

Edit: Oh, and lest we forget, Troy Denning (the mastermind of uberLuke) has also been one of the three major writers of both Legacy of the Force and Fate of the Jedi. So the argument that it's other authors screwing it up is moot.

Originally posted by Gideon
You seem to be having trouble with it.

Not so much. You keep replying, stating that a canon statement isn't canon. So, I keep replying, saying, yes, it is.

Because it's not like standing EU canonizes things that contradict what George Lucas has explicitly said, right?


and GL has the last word. Its not really that hard to figure out.

I confronted you all with this and it took about a dozen posts before you finally found something to contradict it.


I believe with my first post, I said the obvious, that GL was god in his own universe, and you denied that was good enough: So with my second post I showed you. You and I were discussing something completely different at the time, and that was what the 12 posts were about.


And what happened? I accepted it and moved on.

admirably.


Speaking of accepting and moving on, are you sure you're really not still troubled with this?

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=527149&pagenumber=3

^ That's the thread in which you made an embarrassing contention, were corrected by me, continued to argue against it, made to look like an ass, and then called out on it by others who were completely uninvolved in the argument?

That was the thread where I made the statement that we have seen various Jedi use Jedi mind-clouding tricks. You decided that the technique was different for sidious, or something, and tried to derail the thread into a pointless discussion about that. I refused. I admitted that the scale was obviously different, but that wasn't good enough for you.


But... there is contradiction.

What is that contradiction Gideon? Where in the mythos does it say that Luke CANNOT pin himself to something in such a way that the black hole at the center of the galaxy can't move him?

Since you care so much about being right and wrong, Please share that quote with me? Unless you are trying to create the existence of a contradiction by using negatives? Surely not.

What if we defined the Pin Maneuver is a just that, a Pin Maneuver? Say that Luke has the power to be immovable if he wants to but for whatever reason, can't use that same power as a practical offensive weapon.

EDIT - No, that still doesn't explain why he doesn't have greater TK in general.

TJ
Not so much. You keep replying, stating that a canon statement isn't canon. So, I keep replying, saying, yes, it is.

The trouble comes from the fact is that you're completely ignoring the contradictions that have been listed.

Let me guess, PIS?

TJ
and GL has the last word. Its not really that hard to figure out.

WTF

TJ, you realize that the Legacy of the Force, Fate of the Jedi, and the Legacy comics are canon, yes? As is Dark Empire? As is Union? All of them feature things that Lucas says specifically didn't happen. And they've all been published since then.

In practical terms, his opinion is not all encompassing, which is why it isn't plastered all over the canon guide.

TJ
I believe with my first post, I said the obvious, that GL was god in his own universe, and you denied that was good enough: So with my second post I showed you. You and I were discussing something completely different at the time, and that was what the 12 posts were about.

Yes, you saying that George Lucas is canon wasn't good enough. In order for that to be good enough, you would need to be a source.

TJ
admirably.

🙂

TJ
That was the thread where I made the statement that we have seen various Jedi use Jedi mind-clouding tricks. You decided that the technique was different for sidious, or something, and tried to derail the thread into a pointless discussion about that. I refused. I admitted that the scale was obviously different, but that wasn't good enough for you.

You said that Palpatine's mind-fogging of presumably millions (or billions) of citizens is "nothing new" and that "most Jedi can do things like that."

You were corrected; you refused to acknowledge the correction and tried to deflect; this was defeated (repeatedly) and even Eminence called you out on it later in the thread.

It isn't good enough for me when someone [you] makes a claim and then, when proven wrong, tries to deflect, misdirect, or just say no.

Which is exactly what you did.

Deja vu?

TJ
What is that contradiction Gideon? Where in the mythos does it say that Luke CANNOT pin himself to something in such a way that the black hole at the center of the galaxy can't move him?

Since you care so much about being right and wrong, Please share that quote with me? Unless you are trying to create the existence of a contradiction by using negatives? Surely not.

This is explained. Luke has subsequently failed to deliver anything in the same order of magnitude at various points when it would have been beneficial or necessary. I've described the situations; some of them, by the way? Written by the same damn author.

Originally posted by Red Nemesis
As Faunus noted, the strength of the various Dovin Basals' singularities varies greatly. In fact, if they did not then the basals themselves would be largely unusable as transportation mechanisms. The force of gravity varies with the inverse of the square of the distance, meaning that each singularity would have to be placed with much, much more accuracy than they appear to be. The basals would also have to have a much longer "casting range" under this system.

Urm. No.

Firstly: The different uses of dovin basals are nigh irrelevant for the general direction of my comment. You can go and do the calculations for power required to redirect and absorb particle beams (like turbolaser shots), propel world-ships or generate interdiction fields that replicate the mass of a small planet or even a black hole. In any case, the amount of energy generated eclipses the conventional showings of force users in SW fiction.


Nai takes two things as given:

The second is dubious, even if we allow for the fact that it is a vaguely remembered detail from a poorly written book. Gideon pulled the Wookiee's description, so we'll use that:

This indicates that Luke wasn't overcoming the (yet undefined) mass of a black hole alone. Rather, Luke was overcoming the manipulation of a Dovin Basal on a black hole. The difference here is staggering. Luke would, in the first case, have to overcome the inertia of a (presumably) very massive object. That assumption is, I believe, behind the awe given to this particular feat. However, the actual mechanism may have been very different. I am aware that this isn't the source material, but I have no reason to believe it is inaccurate.

After some search, I found my hardcopy of "Onslaught". Here it is:

Luke sank back into the chair and closed his eyes. He took a deep breath and reached out through the Force. He let his sense of things ride above the frayed ones' jagged profile and vectored in toward the vehicle. He got no solid sense of it directly, though a few frayed ones did appear to be housed inside. Instead he used that emptiness as a way point to search out a void, and as it formed, the black hole blossomed fully in the Force. [...]

Luke reached out with that power and latched onto the void that the Yuuzhan Vong vehicle had created. He pushed a bit, then tugged, in nanoseconds getting a feel for the power the dovin basals were able to exert to control the void. He almost smiled, since that amount of power was nothing compared to the Force, but he stopped himself short of pride in that fact.[...]

Immediately the dovin basals started to shift the void to cover this new attack vector. Luke fed the Force into his hold on the void, thwarting them. Their pressure increased, and still Luke held it unmoving. The torpedoes got closer and closer. The dovin basals pulled harder, and when their effort reached a new peak, Luke let the void slip over toward intercepting the proton torpedoes.

The dovin basals devoted their efforts to sliding the void into place, which required both some lateral movement and shortening the arc over which the void would travel. As they brought it close to the vehicle, Luke pushed with the Force. Since the dovin basals were already tugging the void back toward the vehicle, they were not prepared to have the travel accelerated."

So. The dovin basals do create Black Holes but keep that singularities under control. Luke didn't fight against the gravitational pull of the black hole itself, but against the control of the dovin basals. How does that even matter? To control and move a black hole, one would still need unbelieveable high amounts of energy, which Luke was not only able to reproduce but could also overpower.

Even if we would ignore the term "Black Hole" here, we would still be confronted with gravitational energy powerful enough to "absorb" the energy exerted by the detonation of photon torpedos or turbolaser fire - which would again require epic amounts for those tasks and also huge amounts of energy to control the gravitational pull. Hell. Controlling gravitational energy has always been a huge [energy] problem in the SWU, causing the high costs of all ships housing interdictor technology, which generates fields that reproduce the mass of planets or black holes to pull ships out of hyperspace.


The description given indicates that Luke simply canceled out (or even just muted) the controlling basal had over the black hole in question. Unless you want to argue that each ship-sized Basal is capable of putting out energy on the scale of a star it is incredibly likely that some specialized mechanism is behind the manipulation of singularities for maneuvering. This force is all that Luke would have to match. This scenario allows us to avoid a Stellar-Luke (which is not likely in given his other showings) and remain in canon. Luke would only have to match the applied force enough to get the Basal to overcompensate. Then his job is done for him, and down it goes.

See above. There isn't much of a difference between generating a miniature black hole and the effort of controlling it. And how would such an action be "out of canon". Ever heared about Sidious "force storms" that tore the fabric of space-time itself and acted like "summoned" black holes? Why shouldn't Luke, who is - by the words of Lucas himself - equipped with more raw force potential than Sidious, not be able to pull something like this off?


In this way it becomes clear that Luke does not necessarily exceed the Sun in energy output (which is an idea I simply refuse to consider).

I've explained that before. It does depend on the strength of the respective dovin basal. What I presented was an idea of the upper limit of energy those things could generate. Luke took on a group of dovin basals who were manipulating a singularity powerful enough to nullify proton torpedos and concussion missles (note: warheads with the power-output exceeding the "gigatonnage range" of turbolasers). A power that Luke realized as "nothing" compared to the amount of force energy he was capable of wielding.

Does that sound any less impressive, when you think about it?


Nai, you say that the black holes would evaporate almost instantly. Isn't that what we see in the books?

The scene above has the "black hole" existing constantly, as Luke is able to grasp it's shape over an expanded period of time and the black hole is moved. So that singularities remain intact until the corresponding dovin basals are destroyed (which Luke does by pushing that "black hole" into them in the respective scene).


On top of this we have the fantasy elements of the black holes. When they are activated as a method of propulsion, the effects are limited to a single coralskipper.

Again: The power of the dovin basals is "gravity control" which is not necessarily limited to "generating black holes". Creating a controlled gravitational push / pull can (obviously) be used for propulsion without side-effects on nearby space-crafts. And the Vong also run their World Ships with "dovin basal engines" (as far as I remember), which would have a far greater effect on the battlefield. However. This is Star Wars where that kind of energy can be used and contained (Death Star anybody?)

So from your 3.8E28 J we can deduct two thirds, and then lower that even more if the dovin basals only use as much pull as is necessary for the situation.

Urm. 1.3E28 J would still be quite extreme, Neme. Even the amounts of energy required for their respective "tasks" even in that very special situation would be rather high, provided that the things absorbed explosions of warhead that are considered to be more powerful than turbolaser shots (Gigaton range...). That would bring the energy needed down one order of magnitude perhabs, but it would still be outright insane (in terms of physics).

The moral of the story is that I was clearly wrong in the situation about George's opinion, but when I was confronted with evidence, I conceded. You, on the other hand, were made a fool out of an an even less significant issue and stubbornly refused to relent. Let's not get into "LAWL ur wrong" because I've already won that round.

Sorry, but I found this to be absolutely funny, explaining Gideon's reality and how it differs from everybody else's.

Yes, you saying that George Lucas is canon wasn't good enough. In order for that to be good enough, you would need to be a source.

Also, ignoring conventional wisdom makes you look ridiculous.

Nai, I didn't understand a single thing you said. Mind dumbing it down for those of us scientifically ignorant?

We need to assess the specific order of magnitude of Luke's feat. Was it as awesome as they're trying to say it is? Was it better than what they're saying it is?

So. The dovin basals do create Black Holes but keep that singularities under control. Luke didn't fight against the gravitational pull of the black hole itself, but against the control of the dovin basals. How does that even matter? To control and move a black hole, one would still need unbelieveable high amounts of energy, which Luke was not only able to reproduce but could also overpower.

Even if we would ignore the term "Black Hole" here, we would still be confronted with gravitational energy powerful enough to "absorb" the energy exerted by the detonation of photon torpedos or turbolaser fire - which would again require epic amounts for those tasks and also huge amounts of energy to control the gravitational pull. Hell. Controlling gravitational energy has always been a huge [energy] problem in the SWU, causing the high costs of all ships housing interdictor technology, which generates fields that reproduce the mass of planets or black holes to pull ships out of hyperspace.

Again: The power of the dovin basals is "gravity control" which is not necessarily limited to "generating black holes". Creating a controlled gravitational push / pull can (obviously) be used for propulsion without side-effects on nearby space-crafts. And the Vong also run their World Ships with "dovin basal engines" (as far as I remember), which would have a far greater effect on the battlefield. However. This is Star Wars where that kind of energy can be used and contained (Death Star anybody?)

This is all very easily understood.

I'm not sure if you're trying to explain it to me, DS (not likely, given the time of your post), but you shouldn't bother. You're on ignore.

Edit: But I am on MSN if there's a thorough translation of what Nai said.

It's ok Gideon. I enjoyed kicking your ass and watching you elicit the "lightsnake" effect afterwards. I don't care whether you have me on ignore or pretend to have me on ignore, I just post. And if the MSN comment was directed towards me, I'm not sure I want to hear you bitching as you've clearly lost your mind. What I am saying is (whether I'm on ignore or not lol), is Nai's post is pretty damn clear and you don't have to be a science major to understand it.

Originally posted by Dr McBeefington
It's ok Gideon. I enjoyed kicking your ass and watching you elicit the "lightsnake" effect afterwards. I don't care whether you have me on ignore or pretend to have me on ignore, I just post. And if the MSN comment was directed towards me, I'm not sure I want to hear you bitching as you've clearly lost your mind. What I am saying is (whether I'm on ignore or not lol), is Nai's post is pretty damn clear and you don't have to be a science major to understand it.

I've taken just a handful of physics , and it seemed decently understandable.

Gideon:
[QUOTE]
This is explained. Luke has subsequently failed to deliver anything in the same order of magnitude at various points when it would have been beneficial or necessary. I've described the situations; some of them, by the way? Written by the same damn author.
[QUOTE]

You are then. You are trying to create a contradiction through use of a negative. Why didn't Sidious use a force storm to kill Vader and destroy the rebel fleet? It would have been beneficial. But I'm not claiming he couldn't do it. He did it twice, good enough for me.

I've seen Luke pin himself in place against ridiculous forces twice, and manipulate dovin basils another time, I'm good.

Ridiculous TK isn't unheard of star wars at all. N. with the fleet, C'baoth holding the missile in mid-air, Yoda moving a mountain.

This isn't unprecedented stuff at all.

Why do you kick against the pricks?