Originally posted by DARTH POWER
It means that WE KNOW Dooku has outduelled Mace in the past, however we know of no instances where Mace outduelled Dooku, so going from factual information on the subject its at least 1-0 to Dooku.
We also have Dooku's showing against Yoda (X2), coupled with Mace's showing against Sidious, coupled with Dooku's defeat by Anakin, all of which overcome a SINGLE sparring match.
It also shows that since Yoda and Dooku were the only ones capable of outsparring Mace that they were probably the 2 best swordsmen in the Jedi order(not including mace).
Your logic doesn't work here. The Bulls beat the Cav's in game 3. Are they better than the Cav's?
QUOTE=12684548]Originally posted by truejedi
this doesn't mean that Dooku is better or even on par with Mace.
yes
So Dooku outduelling Mace doesnt even make Dooku on par with Mace??Nice logic.
Where does it say they dueled? One sparring match does not an argument make. Once again, look at the Cav's-Bulls, or if bball isn't your thing, look at Tampa Bay beating the New Orleans saints.
One victory, when all other evidence indicates otherwise, doesn't make a superior fighter. Kenobi beat Maul. Superior fighter? You tell me.