Twilight Vampires run the Star Wars gauntlet

Started by dadudemon16 pages
Originally posted by ares834
But there have been some. You claim Vampires run at speeds at 9000 MPH. You get this number through figures. Now I don't recall where this scene takes place but you calaculate this by comparing it to the speed of an Airplane.

No, it comes from Bella talking to Edward on the phone while he's in forks and she's in Phoenix. 10 minutes later, he's there, fighting James in a dance studio.

Originally posted by ares834
But there could be other circumstances at place: perhaps the flight was delayed, perhaps it took a longer route, hell perhaps planes move slower in the twilight universe.

Not only are your suggestions just plain silly, you had a false premise to begin with.

Originally posted by ares834
"bla bla bla..."

However there is another way we know your number is wrong, if a human-sized object was traveling at 9000 MPH and it was fairly close by us, we couldn't see it.

NOW you get it! 🙂

That's how Bella described it, several times, in the book! The directors tried their best to capture that in the first two films, failed horribly, and just ditched it altogether for the 3rd film. 🙂

Originally posted by ares834
You also claim that the Jedi would appear in slow-mow to the TwiVamps which would allow them to effortlessly dodge stheir attacks.

This is because we have seen more than one vampire grapple and deliver blows, when time was in slo-mo, that was so fast that it blurred.

That type of "perception" would make the world around them seem to be slowed.

In fact, that's exactly how Bella describes that shit in book 4. Oh, wait, that's right, they book to movie adaptation was trying to capture that for us and only blind fanboys that hate on twilight would deny what's so ridiculously obvious.

Star Wars fanboys are the worst type of fanboy.

Originally posted by ares834
This is wrong. Go in a Car and drive REALLY fast and tell me that everything else apperaed to travel in slow-mow. Unless, of course, you believe since the scene is in slow-mo it must be for the characters as well...🙄 Finally there is the simple fact that Werewolves can battle Twivamps and there speed while fast, isn't superspeed.

What a completely irrelevant and stupid comparison.
In order for your "example" to even remotely be comparable, you'd have to find a human that could move like that, with their own body, and do super-human agility feats while being so fast that they would blur, in slow-motion.

Originally posted by ares834
Your doing the same thing you allways do... Creating hypotheitcal situations.

I did not know that that is what he did. I don't see too much of that going on, though.

Originally posted by ares834
Wow that one was far easier to say why it was flawed.

Edit: I am not going to take sides and will not argue again.

How dare you take sides.

You're obviously biased and you truly did make some horrendous arguments. The were horribly flawed.

Vampire bewbz, wuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuut.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Vampire bewbz, wuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuut.

Says Mr. Grumpy Pants. 😐

RJ, if all you can offer to the debate at hand is "bewbz", then I welcome you to leave.

Either debate seriously, or leave the thread. I am sick and tired of inane posts.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Yes it would. Now hop to it.

No, YOU made a claim.

We can only go what was seen on screen and it is no-where even close to 10,000 or even 1000.

That's BS and you know it. There are numerous references to there being 10,000 Jedi.

No, you do know the answer. It's just that...well, I can't tell you why you don't realize that you know the answer already because it was, for once, be an actual insult.

If you still refuse to provide a reason, then your claim is null. Claiming that I already know is simply an excuse to not have to provide evidence.

"I will not respond to this point again. That can't be used. If they are used, the Vamps use anti-aircraft fire-and-forget missiles before the fight even begins. Nulled."

You don't get it. Jedi starfighers are part of the Jedi Order. The vampires don't have access to missile systems. Just because you say that they can't be used doesn't mean that they can't

It wasn't seen on screen. You can't just give people abilities and tech that was never shown on screen.

That's a pure, outright lie. Jedi starfighters were shown on screen numerous times.

No, they still wouldn't because if we got into the "EU" then we would have to use "comparable" materials and, in the books, the Vamps are FAR faster fighters than in the films. They literally fight like the Flash (prolly not nearly as fast as a full-out Flash, of course.) No amount of precog will help them when they, get this, can't move fast enough to react to their precog vision.

In EU material Jedi can move faster than the eye can see and often times hold up hundreds of tons with the Force. Oh, and then my tens of thousands of gigawatts of energy generated by the blasts would be valid.

I already have.

And, no, you can't use them, anyway, because it's too late.

"I will not respond to this point again. That can't be used. If they are used, the Vamps use anti-aircraft fire-and-forget missiles before the fight even begins. Nulled."

SHOW ME. I keep on asking you this. There is no logical explanation as to why you can't bother posting it again (I'm willing to post my argument over and over when you ignore them) other than that you're bluffing.

A Tie-fighter is a not a Starfighter, it's a Tiefighter.

A starfigher is a term for space planes.

The Millennium Falcon is not a Starfighter, it's a YT-1300 Light Freighter.

BUT!

"I will not respond to this point again. That can't be used. If they are used, the Vamps use anti-aircraft fire-and-forget missiles before the fight even begins. Nulled."

The Millennium Falcon would have comparable speeds to a starfighter. Tie fighters, which are starfighters and actually less advanced that a Jedi starfighter, were able to keep up with the Millennium Falcon.

Oh, and the vampires don't have fire and forget missile systems. The battle takes place IN THE JEDI TEMPLE. How are the vampires going to get to the United States, which is a long time after in a galaxy far far away?

Why would they need to hack into a US missile base when:

1. Alice's visions work as soon as a decisions is made.
2. Gimping characters so certain outcomes can be obtained, is not allowed.
3. Saying Alice only has 30 minutes to have her visions would be gimping and against the rules.
4. When it was already stated that no human army could stand against just 20 newborn vampires, much less a highly intelligent and old coven like the Volturi's or the Cullens.
5. Edward can read minds.
6. Aro can read every thought that anyone has ever had in their entire life, with just a touch.
7. Vampires have already been proven to be able to run absurdly fast over land.
8. The Rebels or Empire forces would STILL have to locate the vampires and the Vampires could be completely hidden in far less than 30 minutes, making it impossible for anyone to defeat them except for the Death Star from a distance.

1. Huh?
2. Huh?
3. Read the OP again.
4. You don't get it. The vampires have to locate a missile base, hack into it, figure out how to operate it and get it back to the battlefield within 30 minutes, and even then they'd be useless against Jedi starfighters.
5. Good for him.
6. Good for him.
7. Good for them.
8. WTF? Why are you suddenly mentioning the Rebels and the Empire? Oh, and any major SW civilization would easily defeat the vampires. That's an argument that you'd get pwned in.

This point has already been thoroughly beaten down and will not be responded to, anymore.

Bullshit statement. You can't simply state that the argument has already been defeated without showing the argument.

"I will not respond to this point again. That can't be used. If they are used, the Vamps use anti-aircraft fire-and-forget missiles before the fight even begins. Nulled."

"they can't be used" - how so? Because you say so? Stop making statements that have no evidence to support it.

"...your math is totally off. We don't even see anything close to 10,000 Jedi.

Maybe 200, at the most, for all of the 6 films (not counting padawans and younglings, of course)."

And I was giving the vampires more than that of which are named as well, and there are indeed 10,000 Jedi as of the PT.

Oh, and a quote from stardestoyer.net:

"Laser Cannons

TIE fighters are armed with "laser cannons", although the characteristics of these cannons are anything but laser-like. The nature and properties of laser cannons are both very well known and there is no need to repeat a discussion of those phenomena here unless you recruits have been neglecting your studies. However, we have some preliminary analysis on a possible quantification of those weapons in Federation units.

*

From Luke Skywalker's strafing run in the Battle of Yavin, a single hit upon the unshielded surface of the Death Star could be seen to cause a large flash of superheated material, enough to engulf an entire X-Wing fighter and cause thermal damage to its hull despite its shields. Since armor is not flammable and lasers do not create wide-area flashes directly, one can conclude that large portions of the Death Star's surface buildings are flashing to vapor during Luke's strafing run.
*

Because of the shallow angle of approach and the fact that the flashes vary in size and brightness, it is difficult to gauge the actual amount of destruction being done. However, in order to create a flash of vapour the size of an X-wing fighter, the individual blasts must be vapourizing at least one cubic metre of metal each. This is a very conservative estimate since the gas also had to shoot away from the surface so quickly it intercepted the hurtling starfighter, but it will have to suffice. At least 60GJ is required to vaporize a single cubic metre of ordinary iron, so this provides a lower limit for starfighter laser cannon energy."

Oh, and how do they get past the star destoyer?

Another quote from stardestroyer.net:

"

There are three common methods of estimating Star Destroyer shield strength, although accurate estimates are elusive:

1.

TESB asteroid field. The TESB novelization described a "steady rain" of asteroids, and Anakin Skywalker: The Story of Darth Vader said that "turbolaser gunners blasted the largest rocks; those they missed impacted against the bow shields like multi-megaton compression bombs." We can see from the film that the ships were taking impacts at the rate of at least 1 asteroid per second if not more, and we know from the above quote that the asteroids were striking with several megatons of energy each. Some Federation cultists dispute this figure by stating that we saw some slow-moving asteroids in the films, but this is a false dilemma fallacy: the existence of slow-moving asteroids does not prove that all of the asteroids (<99.99% of which would have impacted >off-screen) would have been slow-moving, particularly since typical asteroid speeds in the Earth's solar system have been observed to be much higher than this. Furthermore, the bombardment must have continued for at least 1 or 2 days because Vader had time to contact bounty hunters, who travelled from their various homebases to the Outer Rim while the fleet stayed in the field. Therefore, each ISD might have absorbed as much as 3E20 joules of kinetic energy while in the asteroid field.
2.

ROTJ battle. Star Destroyers were able to survive half an hour of ship to ship battle with Mon Calamari battlecruisers in the Battle of Endor before they started to lose shielding. If we assume roughly one Star Destroyer per Mon Calamari cruiser and ignore fighters (in spite of the fact that they were carrying thermonuclear weapons), we can estimate that a Star Destroyer can survive many thousands of shots before shield failure. In the opening scene of ANH a Star Destroyer is seen firing roughly 25 shots in 5 seconds, for a time-averaged refire rate of 5 shots per second. As discussed in the turbolaser page, each shot carries at least 1.5E15 joules of energy, and around 1E17 joules of energy if set to maximum power. If similar fire rates occured in the Endor battle (note that we are disregarding the heavy turbolasers which would increase the estimate by an order of magnitude), this means that the energy capacity of a Star Destroyer's shields is between 1.4E19 and 9E20 joules, so 1E20 joules (24,000 megatons) is a reasonable estimate.
3.

Characteristics of offensive weaponry. An ISD1 can unleash more than 6E19 joules (14,000 megatons) of energy with a full broadside. If an ISD can withstand at least one full broadside from another ISD, then this would mean that the burst energy capacity of a Star Destroyer's shields is probably in the range of 1E19 joules."

Twivamps cannot defeat Star Destroyers. Twivamps cannot destroy Jedi Starfighters.

Anyone who argues against this is blind.

Akasha, on the other hand 😖hifty:

Originally posted by Hewhoknowsall
No, YOU made a claim.

You made one first, silly.

Originally posted by Hewhoknowsall
That's BS and you know it. There are numerous references to there being 10,000 Jedi.

Not in the movies. MVF. Get it?

Originally posted by Hewhoknowsall
If you still refuse to provide a reason, then your claim is null. Claiming that I already know is simply an excuse to not have to provide evidence.

I will never ever provide an answer for this. Ever.

You just have to deal with it. I refuse to play any stupid little games you think of.

Originally posted by Hewhoknowsall
You don't get it. Jedi starfighers are part of the Jedi Order. The vampires don't have access to missile systems. Just because you say that they can't be used doesn't mean that they can't

"I will not respond to this point again. That can't be used. If they are used, the Vamps use anti-aircraft fire-and-forget missiles before the fight even begins. Nulled."

Originally posted by Hewhoknowsall
That's a [b]pure, outright lie. Jedi starfighters were shown on screen numerous times.[/B]

Strawman.

You said:

"WTF? You seriously think that a space age society that can travel at millions of times the speed of light can't make missiles that outrun ours?"

To which I said:

"It wasn't seen on screen. You can't just give people abilities and tech that was never shown on screen."

To which you just replied:

"That's a pure, outright lie. Jedi starfighters were shown on screen numerous times."

Pwned.

No don't try to lie anymore.

Oh, and to your strawman point:

"I will not respond to this point again. That can't be used. If they are used, the Vamps use anti-aircraft fire-and-forget missiles before the fight even begins. Nulled."

Originally posted by Hewhoknowsall
In EU material Jedi can move faster than the eye can see and often times hold up hundreds of tons with the Force. Oh, and then my tens of thousands of gigawatts of energy generated by the blasts would be valid.

"It wasn't seen on screen. You can't just give people abilities and tech that was never shown on screen."

Originally posted by Hewhoknowsall
SHOW ME. I keep on asking you this. There is no logical explanation as to why you can't bother posting it again (I'm willing to post my argument over and over when you ignore them) other than that you're bluffing.

"I already have."

Not only have I, others have.

Originally posted by Hewhoknowsall
A starfigher is a term for space planes.

No it is not, especially when it is capitalized AND it refers to Star Wars.

Note that I capitalized Starfighter in this original post and I referenced the FTL ring:

Originally posted by dadudemon
If you DO find that in one of the 6 films, then show me an example of any Starfighter (not in a FTL ring), that is traveling at more than 1000Km/h

Two ridiculously obvious elements in my post that are ONLY referencing the Jedi Starfighters.

Could you at LEAST try to pay attention to our conversation?

Originally posted by Hewhoknowsall
The Millennium Falcon would have comparable speeds to a starfighter. Tie fighters, which are starfighters and actually less advanced that a Jedi starfighter, were able to keep up with the Millennium Falcon.

"I will not respond to this point again. That can't be used. If they are used, the Vamps use anti-aircraft fire-and-forget missiles before the fight even begins. Nulled."

Originally posted by Hewhoknowsall
Oh, and the vampires don't have fire and forget missile systems. The battle takes place IN THE JEDI TEMPLE. How are the vampires going to get to the United States, which is a long time after in a galaxy far far away?

They brought them with themselves because Alice can see the future, perfectly, right as someone makes a decision. 🙂

Also, how are the Jedi supposed to fly their Starfighters, inside the temple?

Pwned.

How can the deathstar fit inside the temple?

Pwned.

How is an AT-AT supposed to fit inside the temple?

Pwned.

How does a Star Destroyer fit inside the temple?

Pwned.

Originally posted by Hewhoknowsall
1. Huh?
2. Huh?
3. Read the OP again.
4. You don't get it. The vampires have to locate a missile base, hack into it, figure out how to operate it and get it back to the battlefield within 30 minutes, and even then they'd be useless against Jedi starfighters.
5. Good for him.
6. Good for him.
7. Good for them.
8. WTF? Why are you suddenly mentioning the Rebels and the Empire? Oh, and any major SW civilization would easily defeat the vampires. That's an argument that you'd get pwned in.

1 . Pwned.
2. Pwned.
3. No need because this point still stands and is not contestable: " Saying Alice only has 30 minutes to have her visions would be gimping and against the rules."
4. They do not have to locate a missile base or hack into it. They run to an existing missile base and take what they need. However, none of that is necessary because...drumroll....

"I will not respond to this point again. That can't be used. If they are used, the Vamps use anti-aircraft fire-and-forget missiles before the fight even begins. Nulled."

5. I guess you don't realize how damning this one ability is to any fight that the vamps are, huh? 😉
6. I guess you don't realize how damning this one ability is to any fight that the vamps are, huh? 😉
7. In 30 minutes, the vampires could commandeer or destroy any number of things. That really sucks or your arguments, huh?
8. "The Rebels or Empire forces would STILL have to locate the vampires and the Vampires could be completely hidden in far less than 30 minutes, making it impossible for anyone to defeat them except for the Death Star from a distance."

Bullshit statement. You can't simply state that the argument has already been defeated without showing the argument.

Originally posted by Hewhoknowsall
"they can't be used" - how so? Because you say so? Stop making statements that have no evidence to support it.

You missed this:

Originally posted by dadudemon
Not allowed because it wasn't a tool given in the OP or a few short posts later. Deal with it. 🙂

Dems da rules, bro.

Originally posted by Hewhoknowsall
And I was giving the vampires more than that of which are named as well, and there are indeed 10,000 Jedi as of the PT.

Not in the movies. MVF. Get it?

Remember this?

Originally posted by dadudemon
We can only go what was seen on screen and it is no-where even close to 10,000 or even 1000.

Originally posted by Hewhoknowsall
Oh, and a quote from stardestoyer.net:

"Laser Cannons

bla bla bla."

None of that actually addresses the fact that the Death Star is not actually seen being vaporized. No holes. No damage. It's called a special effect and "boom booms". An asinine explanation for "teh splosions" certainly doesn't make it a fact.

It's completely irrelevant to the thread, BTW. Don't stray off topic.

Originally posted by Hewhoknowsall
Yeah; although impressive, that has little to do with speed, nor will such strength do anything against the Force.

The vampire have NO defense against the Force!

Speed idea - debunked, as the vampires can't move that fast in an actual fight, as I proved.

Strength idea - debunked, as a Force grip cannot be broken through by physical strength alone.

Wow. I missed this.

Yeah, it has everything to do with speed.

He crossed the parking lot so fast that he couldn't be seen and he barely extended out his hand.

On top of that, Edward effortlessly pushed a live tree over. I big one. Right from the base. That strength feat puts him well above a 100-ton class warrior.

Originally posted by Hewhoknowsall
Oh, and how do they get past the star destoyer?

Another quote from stardestroyer.net:

"

There are three common methods of estimating Star Destroyer shield strength, although accurate estimates are elusive:

1.

TESB asteroid field. The TESB novelization described a "steady rain" of asteroids, and Anakin Skywalker: The Story of Darth Vader said that "turbolaser gunners blasted the largest rocks; those they missed impacted against the bow shields like multi-megaton compression bombs." We can see from the film that the ships were taking impacts at the rate of at least 1 asteroid per second if not more, and we know from the above quote that the asteroids were striking with several megatons of energy each. Some Federation cultists dispute this figure by stating that we saw some slow-moving asteroids in the films, but this is a false dilemma fallacy: the existence of slow-moving asteroids does not prove that all of the asteroids (<99.99% of which would have impacted >off-screen) would have been slow-moving, particularly since typical asteroid speeds in the Earth's solar system have been observed to be much higher than this. Furthermore, the bombardment must have continued for at least 1 or 2 days because Vader had time to contact bounty hunters, who travelled from their various homebases to the Outer Rim while the fleet stayed in the field. Therefore, each ISD might have absorbed as much as 3E20 joules of kinetic energy while in the asteroid field.
2.

ROTJ battle. Star Destroyers were able to survive half an hour of ship to ship battle with Mon Calamari battlecruisers in the Battle of Endor before they started to lose shielding. If we assume roughly one Star Destroyer per Mon Calamari cruiser and ignore fighters (in spite of the fact that they were carrying thermonuclear weapons), we can estimate that a Star Destroyer can survive many thousands of shots before shield failure. In the opening scene of ANH a Star Destroyer is seen firing roughly 25 shots in 5 seconds, for a time-averaged refire rate of 5 shots per second. As discussed in the turbolaser page, each shot carries at least 1.5E15 joules of energy, and around 1E17 joules of energy if set to maximum power. If similar fire rates occured in the Endor battle (note that we are disregarding the heavy turbolasers which would increase the estimate by an order of magnitude), this means that the energy capacity of a Star Destroyer's shields is between 1.4E19 and 9E20 joules, so 1E20 joules (24,000 megatons) is a reasonable estimate.
3.

Characteristics of offensive weaponry. An ISD1 can unleash more than 6E19 joules (14,000 megatons) of energy with a full broadside. If an ISD can withstand at least one full broadside from another ISD, then this would mean that the burst energy capacity of a Star Destroyer's shields is probably in the range of 1E19 joules."

Originally posted by dadudemon
Twilight vampires vs star destroyers:

Twilight vampires wouldn't be able to fight a Star Destroyer from space. I assumed they'd be inside and have to take on the entirety of a fully-staffed Star Destroyer. 🙂

Unless you're suggesting that a Twilight vampire some how fight an armed and fully operational Star Destroyer from out ****in' space, which is just ridiculous. If that's what you're suggesting, then it should be removed from the list.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Twivamps cannot destroy Jedi Starfighters.

Anyone who argues against this is blind.

Akasha, on the other hand 😖hifty:

They sure can with much faster fire-and-forget missiles that have multi-factor lock-on capabilities. Countermeasures weren't seen from the Jedi Star fighters. No Starfigher was seen, in batle mode, traveling more than 1000Km/h. Almost all FaF missiles have a speed of over 2000Km/h. That's an absurd speed difference.

Originally posted by dadudemon

Also, how are the Jedi supposed to fly their Starfighters, inside the temple?

Pwned.

How can the deathstar fit inside the temple?

Pwned.

How is an AT-AT supposed to fit inside the temple?

Pwned.

How does a Star Destroyer fit inside the temple?

Pwned.

Dude, get a clue:

YouTube video

Dark Helmet before his Spaceballs debut.

Sorry, Mattie. Won't happen again.

Dadudemon, you don't understand how to debate. You cannot counter an argument by saying that you didn't bother to read it, nor can you make unsupported claims, nor can you claim that you already proved something without providing the source. If you say that you already proved it, how do we know that you aren't lying? How do we know that your proof is valid? You have to show it to us.

You aren't debating right. For example, you keep on using that quote to counter my starfighter argument, even though it has nothing to do with what I'm saying. You claim that they aren't allowed, but HOW aren't they allowed other than that you don't want them to be allowed?

Please:

1. Show me where you proved that the vampires can move fast enough to speed blitz the Jedi.
2. Show me where you proved that the vampires can resist the Force.
3. Show me where you proved that the vampires have a higher reaction speed than the Jedi.
4. Explain to me how the vampires get access to missiles.
5. Explain to me why Jedi starfighters aren't allowed when they're part of the Jedi Order.
6. Provide proof that starfighers only move at 1,000 mph when there are several examples of them moving at over 10,000 mph.
7. Explain to me why you think that only giving Alice 30 minutes is gimping when in the OP I clearly stated that the vampires get 30 minutes prep.
8. Explain to me why in our PMs you stated that the things that blaster bolts blew holes in (such as walls in a spaceport, droidekas, etc.) were made out of plastic and called it a fact.

Hewhoknowsall, stop it right now. Just stop.

dadudemon may not be meeting your "expctations" of what you consider a debate is, but he is debating, nonetheless. Quit your incessant posting about how people are not doing it right or who is a liar, etc.

Also, DDM is right about movie feats only. Jedi do not get Jedi Starfighters because they were not seen on screen. You apparently need to read the rules, especially the MVF Golden Rule.

Any more of this crap, and I'm locking this thread and deleting it.

Now, let's all get back to the debate at hand.

9. You said "It wasn't seen on screen. You can't just give people abilities and tech that was never shown on screen." However, in that section of the post, you claimed that Twilight would somehow win even if we included canon EU evidence. I was refuting that. Why would you refute my claim by saying that it's not on screen when we were talking about the EU in that part of the argument?

Originally posted by Impediment

Also, DDM is right about movie feats only. Jedi do not get Jedi Starfighters because they were not seen on screen. You apparently need to read the rules, especially the MVF Golden Rule.

Whoa...did you say that Jedi starfighter weren't shown on screen?

See this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0cU0BYXlTuI&feature=related

How were they not shown on screen?

Also, I don't understand why you're telling me to "stop" (stop what?) when he called me mentally retarded.

And in some posts he literally said that he didn't bother reading my posts and that I'm wrong anyway. (?)

I'm sorry if I'm sounding offensive Impediment, but how is saying that you didn't bother reading my post proper debating on Dadudemon's part? Isn't that spamming?

Originally posted by Impediment

Now, let's all get back to the debate at hand.

Me: Jedi win because *lists detailed reasons*
Dadudemon: You lose, simple.

???

I don't understand how that's my fault.

I misread the earlier post about Starfighter. I thought that you meant EU. My mistake.

DDM has been dealt with, too. I want both of you to calm down and debate rationally. Whether or not he reads your posts is entirely his choice.

Originally posted by Impediment

DDM has been dealt with, too. I want both of you to calm down and debate rationally. Whether or not he reads your posts is entirely his choice.

Sure, he can choose not to read my posts, but if so, he can't really debate for one side if he refuses to read the other side's posts. That's not "rationally".

Dadudemon, as the mod said, let's debate rationally. Please:

1. Show me where you proved that the vampires can move fast enough to speed blitz the Jedi.
2. Show me where you proved that the vampires can resist the Force.
3. Show me where you proved that the vampires have a higher reaction speed than the Jedi.
4. Explain to me how the vampires get access to missiles.
5. Explain to me why Jedi starfighters aren't allowed when they're part of the Jedi Order.
6. Provide proof that starfighers only move at 1,000 mph when there are several examples of them moving at over 10,000 mph.
7. Explain to me why you think that only giving Alice 30 minutes is gimping when in the OP I clearly stated that the vampires get 30 minutes prep.
8. Explain to me why in our PMs you stated that the things that blaster bolts blew holes in (such as walls in a spaceport, droidekas, etc.) were made out of plastic and called it a fact.
9. You said "It wasn't seen on screen. You can't just give people abilities and tech that was never shown on screen." However, in that section of the post, you claimed that Twilight would somehow win even if we included canon EU evidence. I was refuting that. Why would you refute my claim by saying that it's not on screen when we were talking about the EU in that part of the argument?
10. Explain to me how the vampires get past a star destroyer.
11. Explain to me how the vampires get past an AT-AT or an AT-TE.

I cannot make DDM read your posts as detailed as you wish him too. In the nicest way, I say just let it go. You need to just let it go and drop the argument if you feel that people will not read your posts and continue with the debate.

Also, the next person who starts with the name calling again will get a warning from me. Period.

I'm going to drop this debate as HWKA is just spamming the same points over and over (he hasn't brought anything new since my last post) AND, Imp. has been more than nice enough to both of us. I think it would be disrespectful to Imp. to continue debating in circles like this. He allowed this to go on this long because he's cool: let's just agree to disagree for the sake of not pushing our luck.

Let's clear something up, though: Impediment DID give us a warning for the name calling and that was already dealt with, just like Imp said he did. On page 9 or something. I also never called you mentally retarded. And, finally, no one is required to debate if someone has replied to them. Trying to force me to reply to something you said is a bit much, man...especially when all your points were already addressed. Don't you think?

Originally posted by dadudemon
I'm going to drop this debate as HWKA is just spamming the same points over and over (he hasn't brought anything new since my last post) AND, Imp. has been more than nice enough to both of us. I think it would be disrespectful to Imp. to continue debating in circles like this. He allowed this to go on this long because he's cool: let's just agree to disagree for the sake of not pushing our luck.

Let's clear something up, though: Impediment DID give us a warning for the name calling and that was already dealt with, just like Imp said he did. On page 9 or something. I also never called you mentally retarded. And, finally, no one is required to debate if someone has replied to them. Trying to force me to reply to something you said is a bit much, man...especially when all your points were already addressed. Don't you think?

Dadudemon, the reason why I keep asking the same points is that you refuse to respond to them.

Me: prove X
You: I already did
Me: can you show me the post where you did?
Yoda: You're wrong, simple

Please clearly answer those 11 requests and give me one chance to post a rebuttal. Then really see where we are from there.

But you have to admit that saying "oh I didn't bother to read your post" or "I don't want to show you where I made the post" is really annoying and not valid.

Originally posted by Hewhoknowsall
Dadudemon, the reason why I keep asking the same points is that you refuse to respond to them.

Me: prove X
You: I already did
Me: can you show me the post where you did?
Yoda: You're wrong, simple

Please clearly answer those 11 requests and give me one chance to post a rebuttal. Then really see where we are from there.

But you have to admit that saying "oh I didn't bother to read your post" or "I don't want to show you where I made the post" is really annoying and not valid.

Sorry, I will not address those points because they have already been addressed.

If want answers to those questions, read this entire thread and read the thread RJ had closed. Most if not all the answers to your points are in those.