A bunch of times in which I talked about how straight up running speed is NOT combat speed (which dadudemon IGNORED in his rebuttal).
Originally posted by Hewhoknowsall
I don't understand how asking for proof that vampires can move as fast as you claim IN COMBAT, NOT IN A RACE is "full of fail". It's a valid question, because a commercial airliner (as you used as a comparison) needs to accelerate and cannot do 90 turns (or can it?).Your feats providing evidence for the speed of Twilight vampires (which is pretty much your only argument that you have) involve vampires RUNNING IN A MORE OR LESS STRAIGHT LINE!!!!! You haven't shown any feats that show that the vampires can move that fast in a fight when they also have to do stuff such as dodge, attack, and not run into a pillar or other object in the Jedi Temple while running that fast.
Originally posted by Hewhoknowsall
Again, the Twilight fans have yet to show that the vampires have a COMBAT speed capable of beating 10,000 Jedi before they can react. Obviously the vampires do not have combat speeds that high, and the Jedi merely need a split second to pwn the vampires as I have proven in some of my other posts. Other SW supporters such as Rogue Jedi have as well.Jedi win. The speed blitz argument for the vampires is BS due to the lack of proof that vampires have the combat speed to kill 10,000 Jedi in a split second. The only significant speed feats for the vampires that were brought up involved long, straight runs, not combat speed and mobility.
Jedi win.
Originally posted by Hewhoknowsall
WHY DO YOU IGNORE THIS:YOU HAVEN'T EVEN COME CLOSE TO PROVING THAT THE VAMPIRE HAVE A COMBAT SPEED AS HIGH AS YOU CLAIM!
And no, showing their speed in a long distance run is NOT valid in this scenario.
Originally posted by Hewhoknowsall
Except that you haven't. Heck, you actually accidentally admitted the opposite when we were talking about the books.Please show me the post where you show the combat speed of the vampires instead of claiming that you already did.
And by proof, it should be proof that the vampires can move so fast in actual combat that they can kill 10,000 Jedi before those Jedi can even react. Obviously they can't kill 10,000 Jedi that fast; they'd be hard press to even cause a single casualty.
You lose, and your immature insults aren't helping. You idea about the vampires moving at 9000 miles in actual combat (were you referring to combat speed? If not, then your claim was no relevant to the topic) is ridiculous, as they obviously don't fight that fast here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bNyJZaWbau8
See? THEY AREN'T MOVING AS FAST AS YOU CLAIM!!!!!!!!!!
The youtube video shows the vampires moving fast, but not fast enough to kill 10,000 Jedi before the Jedi can react, as you claim.
The Jedi only need one split second and the vampires are DONE FOR.
Also, even if the vampires were somehow able to blitz the Jedi (even though the Jedi have pre cog and can deflect automatic space age blaster fire) they wouldn't be able to one shot the Jedi. Jedi have fallen thousands of feet before and landed without injury.
Originally posted by Hewhoknowsall
Therefore, the pro Twilight argument is wrong. It assumes that:1. The vampires can attack 10,000 Jedi before the Jedi can react, which is FALSE, as in the movies the vampires don't move that fast in combat.
2. The vampires' attacks can kill the Jedi before the Jedi can react, which is FALSE, because Jedi are very durable, as shown when in AOTC Anakin fell thousands of feet and landed without injury.
Some Twilight supporters briefly tried to state that the vampires can "walk through a Force push like it was nothing", but quickly abandoned it upon seeing that they couldn't prove that ridiculous claim.
Now the pro Twilight argument rests on the vampires blitzing 10,000 Jedi and killing them in a split second, which is ridiculous because a) the vampires can't move that fast in combat, as I have shown and b) Jedi have very high durability, as I have shown. Oh, and the Jedi have pre cog and high combat speed as well.
Therefore, the Jedi win.
Rogue Jedi: I appreciate your support, but please remember to keep this post viewable, as it sums up the pro Jedi argument and disproves the pro Twilight argument. If you post another argument, the Twilight fans will take that as an excuse to respond to the latest post and ignore this one.
Originally posted by Hewhoknowsall
Oh, and you accidentally ADMITTED that the vampires don't have that high of a combat speed:There; your entire argument is in pieces.
Twilight plan fails because the vampires aren't fast enough (as you yourself admitted) and aren't strong enough either, as I showed in many earlier posts.
Jedi plan:
Jedi turn on their lightsabers
Jedi Force pull vampires
Jedi stab vampires
Jedi win
Your arguments to counter this were:
"Nah vampires can resist the Force" - debunked and abandoned long ago until you suddenly bring it up now with no evidence to support it.
"vampire will kill 10,000 Jedi before they can react!!!!" - debunked by your own words, by evidence of fights in the movies in which the vampires don't move that fast, by the fact that the Jedi have pre cog (as well as very high combat speeds) and by the fact that the Jedi have very high durability.
Try looking over your posts. You say "oh it's already been proven that Twilight wins" even though I am REFUTING those "proofs". To cite the original argument as proof against a rebuttal to said argument is so idiotic that I'm trying as hard as possible to not bash you.
I'm pretty sure that I'm going to get a response like "nu uh"! in which you don't actually respond to my arguments but instead say a one liner that doesn't address the points that I made.
Or maybe you'll suprise me and actually quote my argument and then seperate into pieces in which you counter each part like it's traditionally done.
(not necessarily in order)
There are several other instances as well.
Then, when I asked dadudemon if he even read this argument, he said that he DID.
This means:
a) he was lying, and really didn't bother to read it
b) he read it but was incapable of comprehending basic English
c) he read it and knew that his argument was wrong, but still tried it anyway, hoping that I wouldn't notice his cheating
dadudemon, I would like you to explain why you insulted me in your post even though your argument was COMPLETELY wrong, using evidence that is NOT valid.
Again:
Originally posted by Hewhoknowsall
Did you IGNORE my my explanation about how a straight run from one point to another does NOT equate to being able to move at that speed in real time combat?That youtube video I posted shows that the vampires CANNOT fight as fast as they can run. The vampires in that fight were not breaking the sound barrier, and thus were moving slower than the speed of sound.
See? You IGNORED my arguments and insult me.
Therefore, you rebuttal failed, meaning that my mathematical proof still stands.
Oh, and there's still the fact that the Jedi Order would technically get Jedi Starfighters.
Again, in the fights in Twilight the vampires are not moving fast enough to break the sound barrier, thus meaning that they cannot move anywhere near what would be necesarry for them to win.
Hence, the Jedi win.
I'll assume that dadudemon will ignore this post since he can't respond to it; he only responds to the posts that he thinks he can.
Therefore dadudemon, you should withdraw all your insults that you directed at me, since you deliberately twisted facts, as shown in your post.
You have NO defense against this accusation.
And I'm getting tired of your claims that my points have been disproven. Please show me where this happened, because I read through this thread and that other one and none of them showed the vampires having combat speed that's anywhere near their running speed, nor do any come up with a defense that the vampires can use against the Force; well, some do, but they involve lies and misdirection, such as the idea that the vampires can "dodge" the Force or walk through it, which the vampires can NOT.