Captain America and Bucky vs Sabretooth

lol.

What a child.

^ Being childish would be posting some of the evidence that I've already posted to get you to actually start arguing with evidence:

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
Proof that bullets penetrating through to the brain is actually because there is simply no bone back there in comics:

Hell, that may have been adamantium Sabretooth, but Wolverine basically theorizes the same exact thing:

Again, the writers even pander this "vulnerability" to us by conceitingly giving us an anatomy lesson. This is in contrast to your allegation that the comics never once talk about this so-called vulnerability:

What else did you need to support the above past examples where it's pretty much theorized that Wolverine's skull has penetrable points when his enemies actually take advantage of them? All on-panel:

What was it you said again? Yeah. Sure you are. You're simply waiting for some proof Wolverine can or have his brain penetrated. Right.

*looks above*

*shakes head*

Position's already been layed out.

Are you blind, or just dumb?

Oh wait, your right... you're always right... even when you're wrong you're right....

I see now, between that kind of sensability and the endless homo-eroticism in the other thread... you must be the girlfriend in the relationship amiright? 😱

Originally posted by jinzin
Non-Position's already been layed out with no offerings of evidence.

Guess we're done. I've just about done everything I could to get you to start arguing with evidence. Clearly, you've succeeded in avoiding the trainwreck that would ensue. kthxbai?

Trainwreck?
Lol, the only thing I would be doing is providing evidence that someone has already provided for you about an issue I'm on the fence about for good reason to be on the fence about it.

I don't need to start arguing because I don't need to assume a side on this... "debate".

That side exists, the evidence for it exists.. You can ignore those facts all you like, doesn't change them from being facts.

Originally posted by jinzin
You can ignore those facts all you like, doesn't change them from being facts.

...

I sure don't. Thanks for the non-argument for several pages.

Then again, that was part of the reason I started commenting on your assertions that this issue is equally arguable either way.

👆

Because I don't want to take up a position I'm on the fence about?

Yes it surely must then not exist. 🙄

Pathetic really.

^ Being on the fence doesn't prevent you from making wild and utterly baseless insinuations that somehow both positions are valid from an argumentative point of view.

If you'd sop pretending like you can insinuate that laughable premise with a straight face, we'd be fine. Enough with the non-arguments:

Originally posted by jinzin
Pathetic really.

Well maybe you could stop trying to pull me into supporting a position that isn't my own and you won't be met with non-arguments. 🙄

It isn't my job to support the opposing side to your arguments, the fact that an opposing side exists should be enough.....

You pretending like it doesn't, does not make you right.
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=531334&pagenumber=3

There's nothing baseless about the opposing position.
You talk about how it's okay to have an opinion and immediately attack me for having one? lol. As I already said, "what a child".

^ You not providing non-circumstantial evidence? Still true. Not a single phucking scan that shows that a bullet was clearly prevented from entering the brain.

Thanks for pretending you actually have a counter-argument supported by clear evidence.

👆

<insert tired post-b1tch fit "nuh uh" comment below>

Like I said, only you choose what's circumstantial and what isn't... It's a farce.

^ Ha! Relying on a scene where Wolverine picks a bullet out of his eye after being shot? Like the thing didn't penetrate through and perhaps got pushed out eventually in five minutes? Or that it went in at a downward angle and avoided the brain entirely and got pushed out?

Showing Wolverine getting shot in the head by Winter Soldier... and no way to know where he got shot since his head pops backwards at the moment and speculating that maybe it hit his eye so that's proof? Wtf? It couldn't hit his forehead?

Ha! Great show. What extremely desperate straits that you have the conceit to act like the numerosity of circumstantial scans actually lends some sort of quality to them.

😂

of course cherry picking what evidence you respond to in order to ignore the times he was outright shot in the eye to no effect as if pretending those examples don't also exist somehow strengthes your argument.. But again, whateveh.

^ And the other evidence is any better?

Please. Showing Wolverine pick a bullet out of his eye five minutes post-shooting, showing Wolverine getting shot in the head without knowing where it actually hit?

WTF. That's supposed to be as concrete and non-circumstantial as this:

You don't have an argument worth the electrons you killed typing up your non-responses.

Then again, that was the exact point. 👆

this same exact argument has bn made repeatedly in the past by one single individual in the forum it needs to stop..

it's gotten annoying and its done simply to annoy and bait individuals especially when certain rules prevent such arguments to begin with..

thumbsup

I don't know what you're smoking ODG but what is it and where can I get some?
There are at least 2 on panel depictions of Wolverine getting clearly shot in the eye one with a closeup of impact on his eye as it happens and him not going down...

Pretending that evidence doesn't exist does not a strong argument make.

^ Him not going down has nothing to do with the distinct possibility that the bullet went in at a downward angle that would avoid the brain?

Pretending that you're providing a scan which completely shows a bullet being stopped is the only farce here.

You're being completely scrubby in your troll-tactics at this point.

I'm sorry you keep pretending that you actually had a non-circumstantial scan that clearly shows a bullet being stopped by bone. This proferring of "proof" is exactly how I caled it pages ago. Unclear, circumstantial, projectionist nonsense:

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
Look at how I qualify evidence in my statement: "direct, no circumstantial bs, on-panel evidence." I haven't seen anything of that nature.

Again you decide what's circumstantial... In spite of a bullet getting launched into his eye in close up fashion lets theory craft some more to excuse how it disproves your ridiculously absolutist nonsense. sweet. 😐

^ ... at a downward angle. Good job ignoring an obvious circumstance.

I'm not being absolutist. I'm telling you that it's possible it didn't penetrate his brain. You're being absolutist in telling me it must have.

Same with your ridiculous Wolverine dodges lasers with FTL speed when aim-dodging could adequately explain it.

It's why I think the litany of scans I've presented clearly outweigh your smattered proferring. Because they are free from circumstance. Your's are not. Hence, your willingness to walk away and say both positions are equally valid is disingenuous schlock.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
^ ... at a downward angle. Good job ignoring an obvious circumstance.

I'm not being absolutist. I'm telling you that it's possible it didn't penetrate his brain. You're being absolutist in telling me it must have.

Same with your ridiculous Wolverine dodges lasers with FTL speed when aim-dodging could adequately explain it.

It's why I think the litany of scans I've presented clearly outweigh your smattered proferring. Because they are free from circumstance. Your's are not. Hence, your willingness to walk away and say both positions are equally valid is disingenuous schlock.

at a downward angle... lol... yeah that's how it's presented...
🙄

Wait so you think that the bullet wouldn't funnel into the supposed hole in the eye socket?
Waitaminute.. do you think that the bone there doesn't even recede back into Wolverine's head? 🤨

Honestly?

😂 Yes you're being absolutist telling me is didn't... not that it may not have, but that it didn't.

You're also being absolutist in telling me that your previous bullet penetration examples are indeed an indication of pullets penetrating the brain and not low healing factor feats.. why? Because one of the marauders said so? Apparently.

You still thinking aim dodging explain every instance of Logan negotiating lasers and the like IS absolutism...

pretending that anatomical mistakes absolutely don't account for an explanation because on panel evidence is the be all end all, while at the same time ignoring on panel evidence is about as utterly disengenous as you can be.