Originally posted by OneDumbG0It would have to wouldn't it? I mean unless of course lets pretend that Wolverine's eyes have absolutely NO bone in the sockets, which is why Wolverine's eyes constantly sink into his skull. 🤨
^ Excuse me... so a bullet can only possibly funnel into the hole? There's no way that a bullet could never hit the bottom part of an orbital cavity instead of the gap at the rear of the orbital cavity?!LOL.
I LOVE YOU THESE LAST FEW DAYS.
^ Oh, so its not possible that the rear of the orbital cavity is just what's missing due to the common misconception that there's a pathway to the brain there large enough. No... somehow... the entire orbital cavity from the top to bottom to side is missing. Nice assumption.
You're assuming even more bone is missing... to debunk that there is some bone missing... how'd you even manage that?
Originally posted by Starscream MSorry, I won't never use double negatives no more.
please don't use double negatives...it makes your sentence hard to understand
Originally posted by jinzinthe tendons to his eyeballs are strong...hence no need for any backsocket bone to suppport
It would have to wouldn't it? I mean unless of course lets pretend that Wolverine's eyes have absolutely NO bone in the sockets, which is why Wolverine's eyes constantly sink into his skull. 🤨
Originally posted by OneDumbG0Nope I'm just observing that your argument is lacking serious thought to insist that Wolverine got shot into the eye but the bullet somehow missed the brain.
^ Oh, so its not possible that the rear of the orbital cavity is just what's missing due to the common misconception that there's a pathway to the brain there large enough. No... somehow... the entire orbital cavity from the top to bottom to side is missing. Nice assumption.You're assuming even more bone is missing... to debunk that there is some bone missing... how'd you even manage that? Sorry, I won't never use double negatives no more.
Originally posted by jinzinAlright. Let's backtrack here. Take your finger. Point it at a downward angle through the eye. As if a sniper from above is shooting at you.
Nope I'm just observing that your argument is lacking serious thought to insist that Wolverine got shot into the eye but the bullet somehow missed the brain.
Can you possibly point to a path that doesn't run through to the brain? Yes or no.
Honestly. I would have to reach into my eye to prove you right, but to prove you right I would also have to be missing bones I'm not missing and missing them to a degree that would allow for my eye to literally fall into my head as a result of the lack of support. That's what your argument necessitates and it's ridiculous.
Jinzin do you remember the scan in Wolverine Issue # 92 where sabe's skull was being anaylzed he had bone backing in his skull..
the skull scan showed detail of how Wolverine's claw punctured his brain..
Xavier, the hudsons and Beast were all there analyzing it..
so my question why are we assuming that "If" Wolverine is missing Bone Plating that Sabe is too but his scans showing otherwise?
also they were naming the skull parts by scientific name and none of it was out of the norm there wasnt any malformation of his skull formation..mhmm
plus Sabe has other factors that Logan is missing like physical upgrades which would make certain weaknesses moot since he is not Logan especially if he has Ada...
the dude,sabe eats Massive trauma like its a walk in the rain
Originally posted by King CastleWe're not assuming it, we've seen it because Wolverine has been shot and stabbed through the eyes and has mentioned it also when threatened.
so my question why are we assuming that "If" Wolverine is missing Bone Plating that Sabe is too but his scans showing otherwise?
And the guy that studied Sabretooth mentioned that Sabes has no bone back there either. I don't see the two as mutually exclusive in any way.
Originally posted by OneDumbG0wait who stated that sabe is missing his bone back plating in his eye socket?
We're not assuming it, we've seen it because Wolverine has been shot and stabbed through the eyes and has mentioned it also when threatened.And the guy that studied Sabretooth mentioned that Sabes has no bone back there either. I don't see the two as mutually exclusive in any way.
explain in detail
Originally posted by King Castle
Jinzin do you remember the scan in Wolverine Issue # 92 where sabe's skull was being anaylzed he had bone backing in his skull..the skull scan showed detail of how Wolverine's claw punctured his brain..
Xavier, the hudsons and Beast were all there analyzing it..
so my question why are we assuming that "If" Wolverine is missing Bone Plating that Sabe is too but his scans showing otherwise?
also they were naming the skull parts by scientific name and none of it was out of the norm there wasnt any malformation of his skull formation..mhmm
plus Sabe has other factors that Logan is missing like physical upgrades which would make certain weaknesses moot since he is not Logan especially if he has Ada...
the dude,sabe eats Massive trauma like its a walk in the rain
pretty much exactly spot opn.
But it doesn't matter in ODG's eyes because the fact that "it happened" is enough to cement the notion as a forum tactic.
Originally posted by King Castle
wait who stated that sabe is missing his bone back plating in his eye socket?explain in detail
Yeah... it was "some guy"....
Who exactly... well that was never really explained.
Originally posted by jinzinThe fact that it unequivocally happened several times, and was reinforced by narratives several times and the overall notion that Marvel writers don't care about how real life human skulls are structured when it comes to a comic book feral mutant as shown where he gets pierced from everything to his ears, nose and throat cavities all on-panel is enough to cement the notion as comic book fact.
But it doesn't matter in ODG's eyes because the fact that "it happened" is enough to cement the notion as a forum tactic.
Nuff said. When you end up having equal amounts of unequivocal evidence to overturn this, let me know.
Originally posted by OneDumbG0who is this "guy" who stated Sabe's skull structure?
The fact that it unequivocally happened several times, and was reinforced by narratives several times and the overall notion that Marvel writers don't care about how real life human skulls are structured when it comes to a comic book feral mutant as shown where he gets pierced from everything to his ears, nose and throat cavities all on-panel is enough to cement the notion as comic book fact.Nuff said. When you end up having equal amounts of unequivocal evidence to overturn this, let me know.
i really would like some reverence explanation
^ How? What else: Wolverithmetics. Damn the utter logical possibility that you and I have mentioned over and over again.
Originally posted by King CastleThis guy, Teneber.
who is this "guy" who stated Sabe's skull structure?i really would like some reverence explanation
You can just read the scan or X-Men Unlimited #40: