Captain America and Bucky vs Sabretooth

Started by jinzin26 pages

was theorized in character narratives making presumptions or wondering the outcome not third person narrative.

The opposite has happened to, but it obviously doesn't live up to your standards.

So again, your argument dictates that Wolverine doesn't have a spine, a ribcage, and a sternum... He also has a big gaping hole in the back of his skull too.... It happened afterall. dur

^ The opposite has not happened unequivocally. Pay attention to your laughable "evidence" where Bucky shoots him (maybe) in the eye when it was probably his forehead...

... and you can't even bring yourself to point a line through your eye at a downward angle that would not present a direct path through to the brain...

... or countenance that five minutes later after being shot through the eye to the brain, his HF pushes it out.

This is your "evidence." What a laff.

Originally posted by Trackz
Question, even in the debated scan, it took Wolverine 5 minutes to finally recover and take the bullet out no? How do we know this isn't another example of Wolverine getting hit in the brain?

what the one where there's a close up of his eye being hit with a bullet? No, he just kept coming towards his shooter.

Are you reffering to when Wolverine was stuck in that pit being fired on by the anti aircraft weapon?

so a redneck, hunter's statement and assumption ? 😬

^ You call a redneck who had explosive rounds designed specifically to Sabretooth's HF, knew about Sabretooth's adamantium lacing, and had obviously studied Sabretooth and designed a complete method of attack to hunt the "ultimate game" ... a redneck?

Try readin the comic before making assumptions.

its like saying the scottish killer who studied wolverine for years and had adamantium bullets, mercenaries who believed he found a way to kill Logan by slicing the meat off the adamatium and he was the world's top killer of his time..

your post of the guy doesnt make it so, its just his believe from his limited knowledge of a character, an opinion of another character nothing more nothing less.. it doesnt make it true.

you know how many villains claim to know the hero they are after and how to stop them?

you call someone with rounds designed for HF and knowledge of his adamantium an authority on his skeletal structure... in spite of being wrong about it?

^ I'm calling him not a "redneck hunter." Sh1tty[/strike] Nice straw-man. And as we've already seen, the tactic would have worked. It's worked on Wolverine, remember? So don't blame him for trying to use something that woul have worked.

[i]Originally posted by King Castle
its like saying the scottish killer who studied wolverine for years and had adamantium bullets, mercenaries who believed he found a way to kill Logan by slicing the meat off the adamatium and he was the world's top killer of his time..

your post of the guy doesnt make it so, its just his believe from his limited knowledge a characters' opinion of another character nothing more nothing less.. it doesnt make it true.

you know how many villains claim to know the hero they are after and how to stop them?

I posted that to banish the false notion that this "glaring weakness" is somehow never mentioned at all.

You dismiss it and wish it doesn't exist arbitrarily. I get it.

no, some guy who is hunting Sabe and believes he can kill him with an eye shot doesnt make him an expert on Sabe or makes his statement valid.

no more then Spiderman statement of the sentry beating galactus or Sentry stating he has the power of a million exploding suns...

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
^ I'm calling him not a "redneck hunter." [i]Sh1tty[/strike] Nice straw-man. And as we've already seen, the tactic would have worked. It's worked on Wolverine, remember?
I remember a punch of possibly PIS moments that don't have merit to them other than having happened.. I remember a long winded discussion about how something happening alone is not enough reason to use it as a legit example of something on the forums.

But hey what do I know. Wolverine with adamantium muscles for the win! it's happened afterall.

^ Coloring mistake =/= Wolverine being shot every which way through to the brain or stabbing himself through the eyes or people, including Wolverine himself, noting that rounds/stabby objects can pierce through to the brain.

Your straw-mans have gotten that much worse. Thanks for the giggles.

Originally posted by King Castle
no, some guy who is hunting Sabe and believes he can kill him with an eye shot doesnt make him an expert on Sabe or makes his statement valid.

no more then Spiderman statement of the sentry beating galactus or Sentry stating he has the power of a million exploding suns...

Fact that he knew he had adamantium lacing, fact that he knew about his HF, fact that he was able to track him down, fact that he knew about his heightened senses, fact that he was equipped with specialized explosive rounds which react upon his HF, shows that this ain't a "redneck hunter."

Next time, don't assume and read the comic. The guy was wealthy or equipped by wealthy individuals. He studied him. He prepared specifically for him. This isn't some scene where some jag-off randomly encountered Sabretooth in the woods. Much to your chagrin, I'm sure.

i just realized by character statements and believe of others that Wolverine can be killed by simply using adamantium jacketed bullets and explosives..

^ Keep the movies out of this. When Wolverine actually is killed by adamantium jacketed bullets and explosives on-panel several times. Then you can pretend that you have a relevant analogy.

He hasn't. So you don't.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
^ Keep the movies out of this. When Wolverine actually is killed by adamantium jacketed bullets and explosives on-panel several times. Then you can pretend that you have a relevant analogy.

He hasn't. So you don't.

i am reverencing on panel statements and beliefs of certain characters..

Wolverine # 119 not dead yet story arc.

the scottish assassin had bn studying Wolverine for decades to get revenge and figured out how to kill him in "his" opinion by using Adamantium rounds and explosives..

and just pointing out i am not jinzin so pls keep your attitude in check.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
^ Coloring mistake =/= Wolverine being shot every which way through to the brain or stabbing himself through the eyes or people, including Wolverine himself, noting that rounds/stabby objects can pierce through to the brain.
So what? it's happened.

What makes an artistic mistake any less credible than a writing one?

Again, Wolverine doesn't have a spine. It's happened.

Originally posted by jinzin
what the one where there's a close up of his eye being hit with a bullet? No, he just kept coming towards his shooter.

Are you reffering to when Wolverine was stuck in that pit being fired on by the anti aircraft weapon?

yea the second one.

the first one is pretty strange, while it shows that wolverine can survive being shot in the eye, it also shows he has no knee cap.

Originally posted by King Castle
i am reverencing on panel statements and beliefs of certain characters..

Wolverine # 119 not dead yet story arc.

the scottish assassin had bn studying Wolverine for decades to get revenge and figured out how to kill him in "his" opinion by using Adamantium rounds and explosives..

and just pointing out i am not jinzin so pls keep your attitude in check.

My short attitude has more to do with you assuming that this was a character who was some "redneck" hunter and giving me a 😬 smiley.

The fact that this method has worked on-panel several times just shows that Teneber wasn't being idiotic. The Scottish dude was. Because that's never worked on-panel.

Originally posted by jinzin
So what? it's happened.

What makes an artistic mistake any less credible than a writing one?

Again, Wolverine doesn't have a spine. It's happened.

Trying to analogize the on-panel statements and actions of Scalphunter, Teneber, Rogue, Wolverine, Strye, Mystique, Deadpool, Orphan Maker, Wolverine again as being on the level of miscoloring?

Are you that desperate to straw-man your own arguments? lol

I guess he doesn't have one.. it happened afterall.

^ Thanks for being reduced to straw-man trolling.

Took a little longer than I thought.

Nice to know that your initial estimation that both sides are equally arguable has been reduced from running away from defending the obvious circumstances that accompany your pitiable examples and resorting to simple "it's just like miscoloring! yea... that's it!"

kinda

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
^ Thanks for being reduced to straw-man trolling.

Took a little longer than I thought.

Nice to know that your initial estimation that both sides are equally arguable has been reduced from running away from defending the obvious circumstances that accompany your pitiable examples and resorting to simple "it's just like miscoloring! yea... that's it!"

kinda

🙄

Christ, it's not a strawman you twit, it is literary your exact argument, merely transposed on a different bone. Wolverine has been impaled through the stomach with blunt instruments measuring more than two feet in diameters half a dozen or more times. Ergo - according to your twisted reasoning - he has no spine. You can back track now and pretend that missing the his sphenoid bone is some how different than missing vertebrae, but you aren't fooling anyone who hasn't spent the majority of their life drinking paint thinner.