Super Marie 64
Queen of Feuds
Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
There is. Writings, coins with his face on etc etc etc History with proven testable artifacts. The remains of Rome.... Probably DNA coding...PLUS Belief in Julias Caesar's existence requires no control over me.
And it requires me to suspend not ONE bit of my critical faculties in order to accept it as a possiblity.
🙂
Fabrications. I can write extensive biographies of a false individual today in various languages, intellectually manipulate my personality in the text and write it in five different languages. I will then spread it around the world and when archeologists discover these books a thousand years from now, they just might use them as proof that this person existed.
Want a genuine letter, written by Dicky McFail, saying he's accepting an employment for a secret organization?
The DNA can be someone elses, unless you have him by your side to test it in person. For my fictional biographic pieces, I can use the DNA of a deceased baby and it'll all work out.
I am not asking about your belief in Julius Caesar. I'm asking for proof that he ever existed. You are pretty sure that he existed, because there are a shitload of indications of it, but you can not prove it. You can only reference to others writing.
Originally posted by 0mega Spawn
believers of science 😆 you mean atheists right. unless you don't believe scienceand weak how? im asking for evidence which coincidentally hasn't been shown yet 😆
try giving real input genius
No. I mean believers in science. It takes a certain amount of belief in order to refuse God. Which you are doing. Since we segregate science and religion, why not go all the way and call you believer in science. Since you preach science.
It is weak, because you have no proper footing. I have seen very little effort from any of you science dudes to give them any reason not to believe in God.
You ask for proof of God. They give you the reason why they believe. You have not presented a case that prove their reason wrong. All you have done is asked them to prove it more. Once they do this, you will ask them to prove it even more. Then even more.
You are weak, because you do not meet them half-way. You just ask, ask, ask. When they give, you ask for more. Learn to give, or you will be forever weak.
The show you put out, it's a pathetic display of desperate men sticking to their one argument, clinging to it like a baby to a blanket.