Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Straight forward answer would be "yes."Sooooooooooo..............
Limited powers= Gimping. Remember this moment next time you accuse me of "gimping."
BTW: A wizard can simply SUMMON items from Hogwarts. It's called "Accio."
Yeah, no. The answer is no, you admitted it in PM, so what you're doing now is extra-retarded.
Not allowing the combatants to leave the battle-ground is an equal "gimp." It's not just for your precious.
BTW, that spell could be limited to distance. But again, bringing outside items into the battle is likely breaking the OP.
AND WE'VE COVERED THIS ALREADY. BEING ABLE TO TELEPORT TO HOWARTS AND BACK SERVES NO PURPOSE UNLESS YOU'RE GOING TO ARGUE THAT THEY'LL BRING SOMETHING BACK WITH THEM TO HELP TURN THE FIGHT.
Also you can't apparate in Hogwarts, lol.
BTW: A wizard can simply SUMMON items from Hogwarts. It's called "Accio."
I see nothing wrong with that I guess.
Originally posted by Robtard
Yeah, no. The answer is no, you admitted it in PM, so what you're doing now is extra-retarded.Not allowing the combatants to leave the battle-ground is an equal "gimp." It's not just for your precious.
BTW, that spell could be limited to distance. But again, bringing outside items into the battle is likely breaking the OP.
No, wrong question. The question I posted, please.
So now you wanna disallow wizards summoning items? That's two wizard powers. Apparition and summoning. Anything else? You that desperate?
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
No, wrong question. The question I posted, please.So now you wanna disallow wizards summoning items? That's two wizard powers. Apparition and summoning. Anything else? You that desperate?
You didn't post a question, jackass. You admitted in PM that this is a "principals" issue and in no way limits the wizards. Neither opponent being able to leave a given battle-ground isn't a "gimp."
When did I say that? It's up to the thread-starter, as items/weapons available are supposed to be stated in the OP; not added later in. Keep crying, it's funny.
Originally posted by Robtard
You didn't post a question, jackass.
Yup I did, this is the follow up question, you dodged it. See below:
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Answer is yes, wizards can apparate over great distances.Next question: Is confining this power to a certain area, when the wizard can actually apparate anywhere, limiting their powers?
You admitted in PM that this is a "principals" issue and in no way limits the wizards. Neither opponent being able to leave a given battle-ground isn't a "gimp."It opens the doors for more bullshit. Look at your recent exploit, trying to limit summoning charms. I saw that coming a mile off.
When did I say that? It's up to the thread-starter, as items/weapons available are supposed to be stated in the OP; not added later in. Keep crying, it's funny.
haermm You're deluded, dude. Anytime you take an MVF combatant and limit a power they have in any way, shape or form, that's gimping. In this case, you and the others are sick of Wizards raping force users and are looking for a way to negate a certain wizard power.
And failing.
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Yup I did, this is the follow up question, you dodged it. See below:It opens the doors for more bullshit. Look at your recent exploit, trying to limit summoning charms. I saw that coming a mile off.
haermm You're deluded, dude. Anytime you take an MVF combatant and limit a power they have in any way, shape or form, that's gimping. In this case, you and the others are sick of Wizards raping force users and are looking for a way to negate a certain wizard power.
And failing.
Still with that fail point that ignores both:
A) Both combatants and not just your precious are not allowed to leave the battle ground. If it's a "gimp", it's equal.
B) It's mostly irrelevant with teleporting and maximum distance in fights like this. Unless you're trying to angle that the porter is going to bring back some item/weapon not stated in the OP.
Yeah, I'm deluded, yet you're the constant question dodger. I asked you several times, what does it help Dumbledore in teleporting to China quickly and back (otherwise it could be running away) instead of being limited to the battle ground just as his opponent would be?
What you're doing is trying to finagle the wizards out of sticking to the battle-field, which is an MVF rule. We're not negating anything, no one has argued that they can't apparate. No different than saying Iron Man can't fly to Hawaii and out of the stated battle ground.
Originally posted by RobtardDoesn't matter. A wizard power is being gimped. Cut it any way you want, a wizard (or any teleporter) is being gimped.
Still with that fail point that ignores both:A) Both combatants and not just your precious are not allowed to leave the battle ground. If it's a "gimp", it's equal.
B) It's mostly irrelevant with teleporting and maximum distance in fights like this. Unless you're trying to angle that the porter is going to bring back some item/weapon not stated in the OP.They could just summon said item. Wait, you're trying to limit wizard summoning power!!! Wheeeeeeee!!!!!
Yeah, I'm deluded, yet you're the constant question dodger. I asked you, what does it help Dumbledore in teleporting to China quickly and back (otherwise it could be running away) instead of being limited to the battle ground just as his opponent would be?It doesn't do anything either way. As I said, it's the principle of the issue.
What you're doing is trying to finagle the wizards out of sticking to the battle-field, which is an MVF rule. We're not negating anything, no one has argued that they can't apparate. No different than saying Obi Wan can't speed-blitz out of the battle grounds.MVF rule, eh?
The Movie Versus Forum rules - Please Read!!!!!Welcome, everyone to the Movie Versus Forum! Here is the place where you may all pit your favorite movie characters together, beit singular fights or team based. I feel that this may become a thriving place, and I want everyone to have as much fun as possible while posting in here.
However, let's be clear on the rules of the MVF so we do not have any mishaps and/or clutter:
The MVF Golden Rule:
What is seen on screen is canon in these forums. If your character you wish to use has feats/actions/handicaps that contradict what that character did on screen (movie canon), then it is a violation and is illegal. MOVIE FEATS ONLY!1) Remember to use the KMC Search Engine before making a new thread. If you are aprehensive about a topic that may or may not have already been made, please feel free to PM me and I will gladly let you know.
2) Google, YouTube, and Wikipedia are your friends. Use them wisely to find all sorts of neat material for your threads.
3) ALL KMC rules and regulations still apply in the MVF. Violators will be dealt with in a proper manner by the moderator.
4) 1 vs 1 vs 1 matches will not be allowed, as it is just too confusing. Team matches are perfectly acceptable, but the maximum is 3 versus 3. Anything over 3 on 3 becomes too difficult and just ends up as a cluttered and/or dead thread. Army/Group matches are allowed, but, please, be elaborate in your presentation so as not to confuse us. Concerning "group" matches, I mean a group of people from a certain movie, not a group of random characters from a dozen different movies.
5)If you want to make a respect thread, then, by all means, use the Movie Character Respect Forum to make any respect thread that you wish.
6) If somebody makes a thread and only posts "I'm bored. Pick one", or "Who's gonna win?", the thread gets closed. Period. However, if you start the thread in a more proper manner, like this for example:
"Robocop vs. Terminator: One is a cyborg cop and the other a cybernetic organism designed for killing. Which of these two would win?
-Robocop's feats are (explain his feats) and Terminator's feats are (explain his feats).
-Here are some images of both characters in a fight. [insert pics here, but must be relevant to the topic.]
-So based on this info provided, who wins?"
This is an example of one of the right ways to start a Vs. thread.
7) When the thread starter makes a new thread, it is very important to cement the conditions of the scenario in the first few posts. This is to avoid confusion and frustration among the other posters. It will not be acceptable for the thread starter to randomly change the conditions of the thread at random intervals. Once the settings/weapons/gear/handicaps/abilities/etc have been cemented in the first few posts of the thread, that is how they will stay. Therefore, be very sure and for certain of how you want your thread to be constructed.
8) Characters from televised movies are allowed for versus matches, but characters from an actual TV series are not allowed, since, obviously, the tv series is not a movie.
9) An important reminder: This is a movie character versus forum, not an actual forum to decide "which movie is better than the other". Remember that when you make new threads.
HAVE FUN!! This is a new forum, and let's make the most of it!
-Impediment
Yeah, not a rule. Show me where it's a rule.
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Doesn't matter. A wizard power is being gimped. Cut it any way you want, a wizard (or any teleporter) is being gimped.They could just summon said item. Wait, you're trying to limit wizard summoning power!!! Wheeeeeeee!!!!!
It doesn't do anything either way. As I said, it's the principle of the issue.
MVF rule, eh?
Yeah, not a rule. Show me where it's a rule.
Or any runner, flyer, walker, crawler, tunneler, skipper, jumper etc. See, not a gimp. This is why you fail, it's not a gimp when both opponents are limited to staying within the battlegrounds.
Are you retarded? Serious question, cos I didn't say anything remotely to what you're implying.
So you're crying for no reason, great.
Yeah, it was covered long ago concerning people leaving battle grounds. Though I thought it was left to the starter.
Originally posted by Robtard
Or any runner, flyer, walker, crawler, tunneler, skipper, jumper etc. See, not a gimp. This is why you fail, it's not a gimp when both opponents are limited to staying within the battlegrounds.Are you retarded? Serious question, cos I didn't say anything remotely to what you're implying.
So you're crying for no reason, great.
Yeah, it was covered long ago concerning people leaving battle grounds. Though I thought it was left to the starter.
Sure it isn't.
Lulz what you said earlier, dummy.
Sure.
No, it wasn't. Link.
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Link.
http://img.sparknotes.com/content/sparklife/sparktalk/boohooetry_Large.jpg
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Sure it isn't.Lulz what you said earlier, dummy.
Sure.
No, it wasn't. Link.
Alright, genius. Lets say it's Snape Vs Superman; the battle ground is an island and neither is allowed to go beyond the island's beaches/circumference. How is it not an equal "gimp"?
And I didn't say what you're implying earlier either, jack-ass.
Sure indeed, considering you admitted it doesn't matter.
Yeah, it was. Don't recall the thread as it was long ago, but I'm fairly certain in came around cos of your crying back then.
