Thor (movie) vs Superman (movie)

Originally posted by Mindset
What do you mean?

That's how he fights in the comics, albeit with more powers, but ofc he'll be weaker in a movie.

😬

I don't think Thor struck even a single opponent without his hammer. In the comics, he alternates between fist and hammer without any real difference. You can tell it's where the strength comes from. In the movie, all his power seems to stem from the hammer.

I doubt his a lot stronger and tougher than his fellow Asgardians.

Originally posted by CosmicComet
Mjolnir should be his trump card.

Have him apparate it out of thin air when he needs it/wants it to finish something quickly.

Make him consistently do spells without it.

Kirby and Lee got it right the first time. With Mjolnir, Thor is bar none the most powerful hero in Marvel. Sorry Surfer fans. Without it, he's still the physical equal of even the Hulk and has more power. A case for him taking the no. 1 spot can still be made as well.

Originally posted by Zack Fair
No one ever denied Thor was tough in his own right. He is pretty much 2nd to Supes in overall impressive feats in comic book movies IMO.

Originally posted by Zack Fair
That is how comic book video games are though. Superman took on his rogue's gallery in the shitty Superman Returns videogame. Spidey does it on a yearly basis and Logan did in his movie tie-in(good game by the way)

That's what I read. srug

It was either on Marvel.com or comicbookmovies.com. I'll look for it in a bit.

Thor never really had to break a sweet in the movie so we don't know what capable off, but Superman has better feats. It is pointless to theorize about what Thor might do in a later movie, so until the time another movie comes out Superman wins.

Agreed.

I agree Thor is the most powerful Hero in the Marvel universe

I give it to Superman for now until we see more movies with Thor. I would love to see the next Superman movie where (fingers crossed) he actually has a real fight =0

Superman Greater pure strength feats. BUt IMO Thor offensive output was displayed to be greater than anything Superman ever did in the movie.

If it came to a fight Thor has the moves to smash Superman senseless but Supes has the strength and durability to take it for a while.

He could if thor had the chance put the hammer on top of superman like he did to Loki. And just stomp in superman's face.

IMHO Movie Superman >> Movie Thor, featwise.
Stronger, faster and a more willpower.

Thor was impressive to a degree, fighting skills, Mjolnir but his enemies were not really that impressive (Sif took out the Destroyer for some seconds...), nor were his fellow Asgardians some uber-gods. Maybe he will show his high end potential in the Avengers Movie, till then Superman stomps. I'm even tempted to say that Movie IronMan would beat Movie Thor for a majority...

Thor's best strength feat was, when he knocked over the table btw...

Anyway, Mjolnir would do shit on top of Superman. Superman from 1+2 and even the one from Superman Returns is more then worthy enough to lift it with ease... IMHO

Just like the comics, Movie Superman wouldn't be worthy.

He shouldn't be able to pick it up, but who knows.

Superman being able to wield the hammer is not necessary for him to win though.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Just like the comics, Movie Superman wouldn't be worthy.

In the comics he was worthy. And going by the Movie and seeing how Thor became worthy again, Supes would be worthy for sure...

Originally posted by Batman-Prime
In the comics he was worthy. And going by the Movie and seeing how Thor became worthy again, Supes would be worthy for sure...

No he wasn't, he was allowed to use the hammer because of the circumstances, Thor flat out states this and it's proven by Superman then failing to lift the hammer after the emergency was over.

And no, Movie Superman hasn't done anything that would make me believe he was worthy.

Originally posted by Silent Master
No he wasn't, he was allowed to use the hammer because of the circumstances, Thor flat out states this and it's proven by Superman then failing to lift the hammer after the emergency was over.

And no, Movie Superman hasn't done anything that would make me believe he was worthy.

In comics he was worthy. The first time when he simply blocked it and koed Thor (circumstance was to kick Thors ass then, right?). Then he was allowed because of the cicumstances ("Thor's father ain't stupid"😉. Anyway, you can twist it like you want, in a fight he was able to block/hold it, he would do so again.

And yes, he has done enough to make me believe he is worthy.

Originally posted by Batman-Prime
In comics he was worthy. The first time when he simply blocked it and koed Thor (circumstance was to kick Thors ass then, right?). Then he was allowed because of the cicumstances because "Thor's father ain't stupid".

And yes, he has done enough to make me believe he is worthy.

After the emergency was over, Superman was shown trying and failing to lift Mjolnir.

IOW, He wasn't worthy.

Originally posted by Silent Master
After the emergency was over, Superman was shown trying and failing to lift Mjolnir.

IOW, He wasn't worthy.

Yet he was worhty, when he had to defeat Thor, hmmmm.

He didn't lift Mjolnir during that fight.

Originally posted by Silent Master
He didn't lift Mjolnir during that fight.

Worse, he stopped it, while Thor put all his strength in that blow. Quite embarrasing... he didn't get Thors wrist but the Hammer...

There is no enchantment that states only worthy people can block Mjolnir....the fact remains that Superman was shown failing to lift Mjolnir at the end of issue#4.

IOW, he's not worthy.