Originally posted by Silent Master
There is no enchantment that states only worthy people can block Mjolnir....the fact remains that Superman was shown failing to lift Mjolnir at the end of issue#4.IOW, he's not worthy.
If someone is worthy depends on the situation. IOW if he fights Thor, he is worthy.
Originally posted by Batman-PrimeSuperman wasn't worthy in the crossover it was due to the extenuating circumstances. he failed to lift the hammer when the crisis was averted. I also see no precedent for anyone other than Thor to lift movie Thor's hammer. You arguing Superman can when there is absolutely no proof of any kind in the thor movie.
In the comics he was worthy. And going by the Movie and seeing how Thor became worthy again, Supes would be worthy for sure...
Thor wins. Portrayal wise too good of a fighter and too skilled with the hammer for Superman.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Superman wasn't worthy in the crossover it was due to the extenuating circumstances. he failed to lift the hammer when the crisis was averted. I also see no precedent for anyone other than Thor to lift movie Thor's hammer. You arguing Superman can when there is absolutely no proof of any kind in the thor movie.Thor wins. Portrayal wise too good of a fighter and too skilled with the hammer for Superman.
Despite Superman being Stronger and Faster?
Originally posted by Batman-Prime
In the comics he was worthy. And going by the Movie and seeing how Thor became worthy again, Supes would be worthy for sure...
If Clark was worthy, it was only temporary due to the threat.
Originally posted by Batman-Prime
In comics he was worthy. The first time when he simply blocked it and koed Thor (circumstance was to kick Thors ass then, right?). Then he was allowed because of the cicumstances ("Thor's father ain't stupid"😉. Anyway, you can twist it like you want, in a fight he was able to block/hold it, he would do so again.And yes, he has done enough to make me believe he is worthy.
Originally posted by Batman-Prime
Worse, he stopped it, while Thor put all his strength in that blow. Quite embarrasing... he didn't get Thors wrist but the Hammer...
That's not how the enchantment works.
Yo.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Thor wins. Portrayal wise too good of a fighter and too skilled with the hammer for Superman.
the only time we saw Thor FIGHT was when he was w/o Mjolnir; everything else was done via the hammer (even dispatching the D-armor didnt involve a fight if we're being honest, since its not like he engaged it physically.)
theres no doubt that a hammer-strike would knock Supes for a loop, but we've not seen how strong/durable he is w/o it (when not depowered), and Id reckon a punch from *him* would give him pause.
Supes doesnt really have *any* feats where he puts his STR up against another person, but similarly Thor never really fought any1 who was his equal either (and no, Loki wasnt even WITH his fathers weapon, as its an assumption that he was using Gungir, which would be *false* since its a spear, not a staff.)
Tazer
Originally posted by TazerSad we can't use destroyer because it was weaksauce even considering it wasn't OF, Norn or All Asgard powered. Worse still is that Laufey is weaksauce compared Ymir and anyone of the warriors 3 in comic could probably 50/50 him in a fight.
Yo.the only time we saw Thor FIGHT was when he was w/o Mjolnir; everything else was done via the hammer (even dispatching the D-armor didnt involve a fight if we're being honest, since its not like he engaged it physically.)
theres no doubt that a hammer-strike would knock Supes for a loop, but we've not seen how strong/durable he is w/o it (when not depowered), and Id reckon a punch from *him* would give him pause.
Supes doesnt really have *any* feats where he puts his STR up against another person, but similarly Thor never really fought any1 who was his equal either (and no, Loki wasnt even WITH his fathers weapon, as its an assumption that he was using Gungir, which would be *false* since its a spear, not a staff.)
Tazer