Originally posted by Burning thoughtYou can argue portrayal in any medium because in games we know that a general enemy won't more than likely kill the main hero under any normal circumstances but we also know that just because it doesn't happen not that it can't happen.
Not by general enemies hes not. All this "portrayed" rubbish exists in comics I am guessing, games vs does not base characters off whatever gameplay mechanics show because their there for player fun/challenge or what have you, you cannot accuratly argue characters from a canon perspective. Feats, canon ones all suggest hes immune to anything Gabriel has and anything his general enemies have. Hilarious how this needs to be explained, its in the rules and its common sense..if any standard skeleton can stab and kill Kratos he would not be able to survive Chronos' hands, Hercules, poseidon, fight zeus for a second etc. You are not being logical.He has size, Titans like Chronos, Gaia do not need feats to suggest their strong, by virtue of weight and the ability to lift themselves they have a feat anyway. One far beyond Gabriel, your the one claiming he has no feats.
Gabriel has fought beings with immense size as well. They aren't special in your eyes either so size only matters just like feats only matter when you say so hence the double standards.
Originally posted by CosmicCometStill won't watch it. I'll weigh in on both gow games after they get released on the ps3 this winter.
There's no spoiler in watching that video Quan, just simply skip forward to 2:53. Kratos is getting bitten across the midsection by this thing:In canon scenes he's cut by two main culprits
1.) Ares in giant God form, who threw a pillar that would weigh about at least a ton, at hypersonic speeds--(it crossed dozens of miles in a few seconds).
Even when Kratos was hit by that, it was still a durability feat since a normal man would have simply exploded on contact, Kratos wasn't even cut in half when he could have been if the pillar went all the way through him. Its base was wider than his torso so the fact that it didn't even go all the way through him meant his body was durable enough to slow down its momentum greatly.
2. The Blade of Olympus wielded by Zeus when Kratos was weakened and had drained all of his godly power into the blade. And later Kratos stabs himself with it in God of War 3 after having to charge it up first.
Zeus and Ares are on a higher strength tier than Gabriel by far.
Gabriel isn't a normal man either. His strength is supernatural and so are his reflexes and skills. He takes on fallen angels, lycans, vampires, demons, giant immense beings as well. I see no reason why Kratos can't be cut.
You are into comics now these are just inconsistencies like with Thor taking punches from the Hulk yet being pierced by bullets.
If I change my mind after playing the psp games I will let you know but I've never highlighted a few feats and ignored portrayal.
Let's just assume for the sake of argument that Superboy Prime tanked a universal blast in countdown and then it's nothing lower than this can beat him which is absolutely not the case. In fiction we see someone as weak as superboy scar him for life and there are inconsistencies all over the place which is why I have always went for portrayal and it seems are opinions vary based on portrayal even.