Celestials Vs Galactus Engine

Originally posted by Bentley
Tiamut used Galactus because Galan is intrinsically more powerful, even if he may not use that power in his regular self he is potentially more dangerous.

I admit that it's entirely possible that Tiamut beats a non-weaponized Galactus, luckily for us, this time the Celestials are facing exactly that.

No Tiamut used Galactus because Galactus just happened to be on Earth at the time and within the IMPRISONED Tiamut's power range. The IMPRISONED Tiamut altered Galactus to his very core and Galactus couldn't stop him. Think about that for a sec.

Originally posted by zopzop
No Tiamut used Galactus because Galactus just happened to be on Earth at the time and within the IMPRISONED Tiamut's power range. The IMPRISONED Tiamut altered Galactus to his very core and Galactus couldn't stop him. Think about that for a sec.

Tiamut built a gun, he was safe until he got shot by it. Then he died. Was the bullet dangerous for Tiamut or not?

Think about it.

And Tiamut awoke 500,000 years later and Galactus knew fear

There's no way around that as Galactus figured he was done with the Greatest Celestial

As I said, preference is the key for anyone's winner

Tiamut is here with other Celestials

Tiamut>Galactus add other Celestials bye bye GE

See, simple

😛

I b back in a bit time for the store

Take care buddy

Have a nice time Guy 🙂

I will good friend 🙂

Keep the thread goin til I return

Originally posted by Bentley
Tiamut built a gun, he was safe until he got shot by it. Then he died. Was the bullet dangerous for Tiamut or not?

Think about it.

Horrible analogy on so many levels. An IMPRISONED Tiamut altered another cosmic being that was unlucky enough to be within his power range at the time. This sentient being was powerless to stop an IMPRISONED Tiamut from altering his physiology.

Then later, a WEAKENED Tiamut was destroyed by his creation. What's so hard to understand?

The fact that weaponized Galactus have proven to be more dangerous than a senitent one in multiple occasions. Or do you disagree?

Originally posted by Bentley
The fact that weaponized Galactus have proven to be more dangerous than a senitent one in multiple occasions. Or do you disagree?

Even if that's true, what has that to do with a WEAKENED Tiamut? Because you know he was depowered when he flew into Galactus' stomach, you realize that right?

Celestials.

Originally posted by zopzop
Even if that's true, what has that to do with a WEAKENED Tiamut? Because you know he was depowered when he flew into Galactus' stomach, you realize that right?

And you readily assume he would have resisted at full power even when the same Galactus weapon destroyed the very same Celestials that defeated Tiamut before.

Yeah, that makes sense 😖hifty:

Originally posted by Bentley
And you readily assume he would have resisted at full power even when the same Galactus weapon destroyed the very same Celestials that defeated Tiamut before.

Yeah, that makes sense 😖hifty:

You got proof they were destroyed?

Originally posted by zopzop
You got proof they were destroyed?

Of course not, sometimes I get confused and mention things that may have never happened ahah

😮

Originally posted by jalek moye
It happens all the time in comics though. A group is failing to hold off something and they all fall but one who holds out a little longer despite that fact that it doesn't make sense. Hell not even just comics fiction in genera.

As I stated earlier, welcome to comics. Just because something doesn't quite makes sense, doesn't mean invalidate it and throw it away.

Furthermore, what makes little sense here, is people don't want to accept on panel narration that corroborates the artwork shown. Instead, that want to go by evidence not shown in narration or artwork.. and that is suppose to be more convincing?

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
As I stated earlier, welcome to comics. Just because something doesn't quite makes sense, doesn't mean invalidate it and throw it away.

Furthermore, what makes little sense here, is people don't want to accept on panel narration that corroborates the artwork shown. Instead, that want to go by evidence not shown in narration or artwork.. and that is suppose to be more convincing?

I remember an issue where Thor throws his hammer aside while fighting hulk and declares the equivalent of: let fists do alone what the hammer could not....
Or something like that and I was like... WTF?

Originally posted by Galan007
You've misunderstood my entire stance if you think this what I was arguing.

Never once did I say that it appeared as though Galactus "was about to triumph" over the GE. Rather, I said that based on the fact that he + numerous other cosmics had barely been able to hold back the GE beforehand, there's no conceivable way he alone should have been able to--even for a moment. If he was capable of holding back the GE all by himself (and in a weaker state than he started at, btw) then why had he, along with multiple cosmics, previously been struggling to do so..?

Again, you simply will not convince me Galactus was soloing the GE for any length of time. Sorry, but I'm not budging on this one.

It's true, based on what we saw it made little to no sense but it's a comic.

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
It's true, based on what we saw it made little to no sense but it's a comic.

...But I'm sure that while the consensus would agree a full powered Odin is no less than equal to a less than well-nourished Galactus, they would disagree that he alone could hold back the GE--and for good reason.

So wtf? srsly

odin would just headbutt the galactus engine

Originally posted by Galan007
Kay. So by the opposite logic, Odin should be able to (albeit momentarily) hold back the GE all by himself. After all, if a weaker Galactus was able to do it, a full-powered Odin should be able to do it as well... And likely even easier at that.

...But I'm sure that while the consensus would agree a full powered Odin is no less than equal to a less than well-nourished Galactus, they would disagree that he alone could hold back the GE--and for good reason.

So wtf? srsly

I'll agree to that Galactus is currently going through a rather turbulent time. We have his powerlevel all over the map atm, as you said yourself in another thread, that the Nova Galactus written by Dan Abnett would have Odin not even giving out a bip on Galactus radar, then we have Pak's Galactus, then the Cancerverse war Galactus where the writer obviously see him as on the level of the Celestials. And then Fraction who has Galactus coming out on top against Odin but in what shape we don't know. So basically Galactus has been thrown alot around over the last 3 years in terms of were exactly he is located as a character powerwise. Each writer obviously have his own ideas, and because Galactus doesn't have a regular series, it turns into a complete mess.

Originally posted by psycho gundam
odin would just headbutt the galactus engine

👆

Originally posted by Galan007
Kay. So by the opposite logic, Odin should be able to (albeit momentarily) hold back the GE all by himself. After all, if a weaker Galactus was able to do it, a full-powered Odin should be able to do it as well... And likely even easier at that.

...But I'm sure that while the consensus would agree a full powered Odin is no less than equal to a less than well-nourished Galactus, they would disagree that he alone could hold back the GE--and for good reason.

So wtf? srsly