Originally posted by Galan007
...Come to think of it, since the UN is "part" of Galactus, I suppose he WAS powerful enough to destroy Abraxas... In a sense. 🙂At any rate, I'm not saying Galactus is on par with Abraxas, per se--but imo it can logically be viewed both ways, depending how highly you view 'rax.
👆
Originally posted by zopzop
100% correct :
i dislike using 30 year old scans to retroactively prove a point that it doesn't necessarily support anyway. 😬
so zop, REMOVE the retroactive context you're applying to that scan and tell me what you think the author--AT THE TIME--meant by eternity's speech.
Originally posted by leonidas
i dislike using 30 year old scans to retroactively prove a point that it doesn't necessarily support anyway. 😬so zop, REMOVE the retroactive context you're applying to that scan and tell me what you think the author--AT THE TIME--meant by eternity's speech.
That Eternity and all his alternate selves are aware of what happens to each other.
Originally posted by leonidas
so, explain it to me. seriously.
We're both talking about this scan and comment right?
Originally posted by zopzop
100% correct :
That Eternity and all his alternate selves are aware of what happens to each other.
I mean I don't understand how to explain it to you better than the writer of that story did. His (Eternity's) very first statement proves my point.
Originally posted by zopzop
We're both talking about this scan and comment right?I mean I don't understand how to explain it to you better than the writer of that story did. His (Eternity's) very first statement proves my point. [/B]
maybe it's me. the statement reads:
"Of the nigh infinite number of aspects that comprise my totality, i am the only aspect to succumb to death."
i don't see how that translates to all aspects automatically KNOWING that this aspect died..... each eternity is an individual entity. there is absolutely nothing in that scene to indicate they share a consciousness. shrug
and obviously, this is well before the idea of any multi-entity was ever dreamed of. are you saying that this 'totality' is retroactively the multi-entity?? that.... makes no sense. you can't use this scene to retroactively prove the existence of a multi-entity that shares a consciousness with all versions of eternity. 😬
