Man follows black teen who seems "suspicious" and kills him.

Started by focus4chumps78 pages

Originally posted by dadudemon
He was just a booooy! crybaby A mere boooy! crybaby

A 6'1" boy who kicked a 29 year old man's *ss, was 17 and almost eligible for the draft! crybabycrybabycrybaby

Chumpy's logic: when you turn 18, you magically gain tons of wisdom, knowledge, and insight.

Edit - Do you work in insurance policy making? You know, the person that sets the policy drops at 25 because 25 year olds magically get more safe as drivers they day of their 25th b-day?

im quoting the law.

this was a legal matter so its fully appropriate while your childish rant is pure idiocy.

now get mad and cry about it for 12 pages.

Originally posted by Robtard
There is no draft and he's a underage according to law, so calling him a "kid" isn't sympathy gathering, it's fact. Zimmerman killed a kid. /fact
Originally posted by dadudemon
almost eligible for the draft

You can even join the military at 17.

And I checked: the laws say nothing about "kid". It's various shades of adulthood from 16-18. At no point would it ever be appropriate, legally, to call a 17-year old "kid" or "boy" as Bardy and myself were doing. I'm pretty sure Trayvon would object to us calling him a kid and a boy, as well: might bash our skulls on the sidewalk and almost break our noses, to be exact.

Originally posted by focus4chumps
im quoting the law.

this was a legal matter so its fully appropriate while your childish rant is pure idiocy.

now get mad and cry about it for 12 pages.

It's okay: you tried. Trying is what counts.

Originally posted by dadudemon

It's okay: you tried. Trying is what counts.

is that your normal replay when you get called for contradicting easily recognizable fact? honk honk?

Originally posted by dadudemon
You can even join the military at 17.

And I checked: the laws say nothing about "kid". It's various shades of adulthood from 16-18. At no point would it ever be appropriate, legally, to call a 17-year old "kid" or "boy" as Bardy and myself were doing. I'm pretty sure Trayvon would object to us calling him a kid and a boy, as well: might bash our skulls on the sidewalk and almost break our noses, to be exact.

With your parent's consent, cos you're not an adult yet. There is also no draft, so he couldn't be "almost legible" for something that doesn't exist atm.

Age of Majority in Florida is 18. Ergo, calling him a "kid" is just one version of saying he's not an adult. Zimmerman killed a kid; this is a fact.

Originally posted by Robtard
With your parent's consent. There is also no draft, so he couldn't be "almost legible" for something that doesn't exist atm.

Really? So that eligibility for draft stuff I had to fill out at 17 was fake? 🙂

Originally posted by Robtard
Age of Majority in Florida is 18. Ergo, calling him a "kid" is just a version of saying he's not an adult.

"It's various shades of adulthood from 16-18."

"...when you turn 18, you magically gain tons of wisdom, knowledge, and insight."

"At no point would it ever be appropriate, legally, to call a 17-year old "kid" or 'boy'"

Originally posted by dadudemon
Really? So that eligibility for draft stuff I had to fill out at 17 was fake? 🙂

"It's various shades of adulthood from 16-18."

"...when you turn 18, you magically gain tons of wisdom, knowledge, and insight."

"At no point would it ever be appropriate, legally, to call a 17-year old "kid" or 'boy'"

If the draft is active, please do show it. Last I heard, the draft ended in 1973, iirc.

Not sure what you're going on about, but you're not an adult at 17 in Florida(I googled to make sure), which is the state he lived in. "Kid" fits, Zimmerman killed a kid. How big and scary he looked doesn't matter to the law here.

He also molested a kid, incidentally.

Who cares?

Originally posted by Robtard
If the draft is active, please do show it. Last I heard, the draft ended in 1973, iirc.

Not sure what you're going on about, but you're not an adult at 17 in Florida(I googled to make sure), which is the state he lived in. "Kid" fits, Zimmerman killed a kid. How big and scary he looked doesn't matter to the law here.

he was talking about the draft registration, which is supposed to be filled out on or before the 18th birthday, so that said applicant will be available from the moment they are a legal adult...which coincidentally and mindblowingly is 18.

30+ pages of scatterbrained and logically convoluted ddm literature will prove this easily confirmable fact wrong, of course.

Originally posted by pgdarth95
Who cares?

I imagine Trayon's parents care a lot. Along with other people.

Originally posted by Robtard
If the draft is active, please do show it. Last I heard, the draft ended in 1973, iirc.

Not sure what you're going on about, but you're not an adult at 17 in Florida(I googled to make sure), which is the state he lived in. "Kid" fits, Zimmerman killed a kid. How big and scary he looked doesn't matter to the law here.

I think it's pretty important to note that Trayvon Martin was not a "kid" when he was killed and the only time it is used is when people are committing the logical fallacy known as "appeal to emotion".

Colloquially, he as not a "kid." Legally, he was not a "kid". In no sense of the word,, was he a kid.

Originally posted by Robtard
I imagine Trayon's parents care a lot. Along with other people.

Like that girlfriend he was on the phone with just a few minutes before he was shot and killed...

Originally posted by dadudemon
I think it's pretty important to note that Trayvon Martin was not a "kid" when he was killed and the only time it is used is when people are committing the logical fallacy known as "appeal to emotion".

Colloquially, he as not a "kid." Legally, he was not a "kid". In no sense of the word,, was he a kid.

If you mean it in the manner of "a young goat", agreed. Otherwise in the manner denoting that he was not an adult at 17 by Florida law, "kid" fits.

Kid can refer to 'a young person', so yes, it fits colloquially and legally. Zimmerman killed a kid.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Legally, he was not a "kid". In no sense of the word,, was he a kid.

dmm's pontification > florida law (apparently)

DDM makes some of the weirdest arguments sometimes...

Originally posted by dadudemon
naw what I mean, bro?

no, but I'm one of those silly people who wouldn't call a 17 year old an adult.

Originally posted by dadudemon
I think it's pretty important to note that Trayvon Martin was not a "kid" when he was killed and the only time it is used is when people are committing the logical fallacy known as "appeal to emotion".

Colloquially, he as not a "kid." Legally, he was not a "kid". In no sense of the word,, was he a kid.

Like that girlfriend he was on the phone with just a few minutes before he was shot and killed...


Down here, in Florida, we call people in their twenties "kids." People call me a "kid" all the time and I'm nearing 22. If I were shot on the street, people would say "did you hear about that kid who got shot?" as likely as they'd say "did you hear about the young man who got shot?" In the case of a 17 year old, pretty much everyone I know would say "the kid who got shot" and only police and journalists would use the term "young man"

Maybe it's a Southern thing, but I'm willing to bet this is the case in other places too, and you're either being silly or Oklahoma is different in it's use of informal age labels.

Also, is there really a legal definition for "kid" besides the meat of young goats?

Originally posted by Omega Vision

Maybe it's a Southern thing, but I'm willing to bet this is the case in other places too

it is

Originally posted by Omega Vision
and you're either being silly

he is

Originally posted by Omega Vision
or Oklahoma is different in it's use of informal age labels.

it doesnt

Originally posted by Omega Vision
Also, is there really a legal definition for "kid" besides the meat of young goats?

Bingo.

As far as that other "kid" shit, I call bullshit. A kid is not a 17 year old colloquially. All of my Floridian anecdotes are 3 times the amount of yours so I win.

Originally posted by Oliver North
DDM makes some of the weirdest arguments sometimes...

That the law doesn't call adolescents and young adults "kid" on the books and 17 year olds would not think of themselves as "kids"? Yeah, I'm sooooooooo weird. dur <----Smilie face proves it.

So we mustn't call Martin a "kid" cos there's not a legal standing definition?

Originally posted by Robtard
So we mustn't call Martin a "kid" cos there's not legal standing definition?

No, mostly because he wasn't a kid and people do it do make arguments from emotion.