Originally posted by EpicurusSince we agree that Amadeus Cho has no reason to lie, what evidence do you have that leads you to believe his observation was so wildly inaccurate, it was wrong by a measure of exponential magnitude: universe as opposed to multiverse? Like Cho, wasn't just wrong. He was wrong by an infinitude of wrong. I'll revisit this below.
There is a difference between Cho and someone like Lucifer, in whose very character not lying is a code he lives by. For Lucifer, his word is nothing short of absolute. But that's besides the point. Until you point out the exact post where I claimed that Cho lied, you can take this strawman and shove it where the sun doesn't shine.
Originally posted by EpicurusI have no idea why you're bringing up something completely different, even though I clearly clarified what I was referring to. Is it because my actual argument is something you can't argue against much less approach? Ok, then. Nice quaneuver.
I referenced the Nemesis issue because you've disagreed with Master and SunD's interpretation of the gems possessing multiversal scope of power before as well. Not that I actually have any particular issues with that argument. Lawl at you accusing me of deflections, when you were the one who brought up the IG in the first place. How does it feel to dig your own grave?
Originally posted by Epicurus1) Then clearly, if you don't question Cho's claim, then we've got character statements in support of both feats being multiversal.
1)Who cares? I certainly don't, since I never questioned Cho's claims regarding the destruction of the multiverse to begin with.
2)You could say that pretty much for any comic book publication in which such a feat occurs. The term multiverse is often used loosely and thrown around quite a lot, and for all feats that are shown to be multiversal in scope on-panel, some other evidence in some other comic book eventually pops indicating that the event in question was universal. Your contention, from what I gather, is that in light of such contrary evidence existing, the proof which supports the feat being multiversal should be strong enough to be indisputable i.e everything must be spelled out for the reader(the multiversal feat has to involved alternate universes, otherwise it ain't multiversal). That's not how the comic medium works, even though the evidence posted for Lucifer does fulfill your criteria imo(can't speak for Mikaboshi as I am unaware of the evidence posted in his favor).
2) Vertigo doesn't deal with the multiverse anywhere close to the frequency and detail that Marvel does. Any assertion otherwise renders you pants-on-head retarded. Which is all besides the point. Because in the end, you're just acknowledging that the arguments for multiversality are virtually the same for both Lucifer and Chaos King.
Originally posted by EpicurusWhat do Celestials' chances against the IG have anything to do with Lucifer or Chaos King? How many times do I have to press people in this thread to stick with the actual characters in this thread? Are my criticisms that the farther you have to stray from the actual characters and their actual feats, the more flimsy the argument is?
But anyways, since you claim that a multiversal being definitely constitutes an infinitude of power beyond a universal being, does a host of Celestials beat the current IG iyo?Considering that I am not biased for either company's characters(which you and Master certainly are when it comes to Marvel and which Leo and phildo are as well when it comes to DC), I doubt I need to consider how I would react if an accusation like that were to be thrown in my face. 🙂
I am offended that someone would call the strongest evidence posted in favor of Lucifer(his own word) as indisputable, because that either reeks of sheer ignorance of how the character was written under Carey or literal quan-level trollery.
I've actually been accused of being a DC fanboy. Maybe has something to do with how often I argue against Wolverine and, ironically enough, Marvel Cosmic. But for the most part, I don't give a sh1t what you assert about yourself or me. You've given me absolutely nothing to make me believe you're doing anything but just considering evidence from Lucifer's side in a completely hypocritical manner. Such blatant hypocrisy typically only stems from deep-seeded bias. I mean, you've even gone so far as admitting outright to not knowing what evidence is there for Mikaboshi. I'd rather you be biased and informed then unbiased and uninformed just talking out your a$$.
Because the term "multiverse" being dropped once in a random conversation twice-removed from Lucifer's feat + your faith in Lucifer's word in that twice-removed conversation makes Lucifer's feat more multiversal than Chaos King's despite the term "multiverse" being dropped several times in actual conversations directly tied to Chaos King's actual feat + the undisputed faith in Cho's calculations. Sorry, but when you're referencing quan-lite with the utter hypocrisy you're displaying here, the irony threatens to break the internet. Thanks for the laughs.