Originally posted by Arhael
And what is wrong in that? And Vitiate got help in conquering half of the republic, so do I lowballing him for that?
Getting help is not an issue, if it is part of the plan to deal with a threat. The 'pioneer' of such a plan is certainly an intelligent individual because he/she is being calculative. But Luke is not a brilliant tactician. I have noticed a pattern in his story that either Luke's companions help him on their own accord or Luke attempts to save them in solo fashion. True that I have not read all of Luke's books because I do not have that much free time but I have read enough to form a general assessment about him.
Originally posted by Arhael
And this statement based on what exactly? You have some room to argue about UnuThul but your assumption about Lord Nyax is baseless and wrong, Luke was no match for him both in the Force and lightsaber combat. Luke, Mara and Tahiri fought him with lightsabers simultaneously and couldn't defeat him (And he was inexperienced combatant as evidenced by analysis of a Yuuzhan Vong). Also, Luke made intelligent move, he executed a kick into his hand, so one of his 8 lightsabers could kill him but a safe mechanism switched off that lightsaber.
As for Force he simultaneously nearly mind dominated all three Jedi. When Luke, Mara and Tahiri got empowered by Force nexus, they only could throw heavier objects. When he got empowered, he was flying in the air high above and created huge storm of various objects destroying skyscrapers and Yuuzhan Vong ships. And that storm lasted even after he died.
Look at this:
Why, when fighting Lord Nyax, does Luke seem so weak?
At the point he first encounters Lord Nyax, Luke is tired and dispirited, which makes him more vulnerable to Nyax's mental manipulation attacks. And through a bizarre (and, we hope, not reproduceable) combination of biology and hardware, Lord Nyax is able to project a tremendous amount of power into his mental compulsion abilities, enough to affect even the most powerful Jedi. This doesn't make him more powerful in the Force than those Jedi — it just means that he has one or two areas where his "energy output" exceeds theirs. (We can assume that constant use of his powers at that level might burn him out after a while... but the events of Rebel Stand all take place before he reaches that point.)
From here: http://www.aaronallston.com/factpages/faqswars.html
If you will continue to argue like this, you will loose credibility in debates. You do not point out the sources. You twist canonical information to favour your arguments or misinterpret them. You never explained that how Nyax died and how Luke played his part in his death.
Originally posted by Arhael
Compare experience in lightsaber combat of Luke and Rainar Thul and it will make perfect sense. And superior lightsaber combat is not example of superior power.
My point is that Luke dominated him in combat and forced his will upon him. This does not strikes to me as an example to consider for Luke's intelligence because Unu'Thul was not very smart either.
The intelligence part of confrontation with Unu'Thul has been pinpointed by me already in my previous response which was associated with countering his mental influence. So it would be good for you to drop this example.
Originally posted by Arhael
Which shows his intelligence as there were more powerful opponents against him and he often was heavily outnumbered.
Simply no. Luke's immense power gave him advantage in many of his duels. His enemies could not defeat him regardless of any tactics they employed against him. In this context, Luke is a bad example to consider for intelligence related debates.
Originally posted by Arhael
Indeed, so was Vitiate.
🙄
You seem to be hell-bent in destroying your credibility in debates with these idiotic one-liners.
I wish to open your mind. But you are not getting the memo.
Originally posted by Arhael
Then take your words back about dismissing Luke's feats as irrelevant to combat, you started this thing. Or finally start giving examples of intelligence during combat as it is the only thing that matters in versus thread.
Do not blame me for blowing things out of proportion.
This is my original statement:
Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
See the explanation of second confrontation between Revan and Vitiate above. Point is that it is very difficult to make realistic assessment of qualities of characters on the basis of what happens during gameplay. The concept of [I]dramatic conflict is absent in gameplay. This is where novels come in to the picture. And Vitiate was fantastic in novel. He was not just extraordinarily powerful but also a smart decision-maker.Luke isn't that smart to be honest. On many difficult occasions, he made it through with help of others. Read his novels properly and you will understand my point. Yes, Luke is immensely powerful. However, he can loose too - to other immensely powerful individuals. Many people do not pay attention to circumstances. They always focus on outcomes. I do not follow this approach.
------------
My standing has been clear and precise from the beginning. But NO! You are hell-bent on claiming that Vitiate is stupid and Luke is the most intelligent Jedi in the history of the Star Wars just for the sake of point scoring.
I never stated that he isn't smart. I stated that he isn't that smart. Their is a difference between the two. But for the sake of argument, you just could not control yourself. You should expand on a point, if you are very capable at explaining your point. Otherwise, refrain from doing so.
Originally posted by Arhael
There is nothing to ponder. It is sign of Jedi or Sith intelligence and common sense to use various tools and skills in order to increase their capabilities and chances of winning.Spoiler:
Lightsaber combat is one of them
Lightsaber dueling is a common theme in Star Wars mythos. The developers thought differently in case of Vitiate. Here was an individual who gained immense power through combination of his powers and intelligence and not with martial aspects of combat.
Now consider the analogy of Bane and Zannah here. Bane was a great lightsaber combatant but also intelligent decision-maker. He killed Kas'im with his intelligent decision-making during combat and not martial prowess.
Similarly, Zannah took out Raskta Lsu with a clever move (stabbed her from behind) and not with her martial prowess.
Therefore, lightsaber dueling skills are not a good indication of one's intelligence in combat. They do not make an individual a brilliant tactician.
Originally posted by Arhael
That power alone gives him the win against any opponent. Power alone ensured his victory. You give same statement about Luke but it is multiple times more true about Vitiate.
You are forgetting crucial things. Yes! Vitiate often wins with his great powers. However, Vitiate is known to plan in advance on how to deal with a threat, if he learns about it on time. Vitiate prefers to control the outcome. This is very decent strategy. Even during unfavourable circumstances, Vitiate can attempt to use his surroundings against his adversaries. For example; when Hero of Tython cut Vitiate's Voice down, Vitiate collapsed the building where this fight took place in an attempt to trap and kill his adversary. It is another thing that Hero of Tython managed to escape somehow. Therefore, your assumption that Vitiate fights mindlessly is pathetic and useless.
Tell me, whom would you consider more intelligent from the two;
1. An individual who plans and prepares himself in advance for an upcoming threat to control the outcome.
2. An individual who goes in to a fight and attempts to outwit the opponent during the fight.
Originally posted by Arhael
It is way easier to sit on a throne and with superior power alone make your foe bend to your knees. Things for Luke have never been even remotely as easy. If Luke is Gary Stue, then Vitiate is his grandfather or at least Bandon's brother.
Or you can say that Vitiate made things easier for him by adopting a better approach.