Originally posted by abhilegend
You stepped down from helpless to disadvantaged, that's a start. Could she have used her advantage, maybe. Could she win, not likely seeing he has bounced back from worse. He was healed and wasn't even down from the attack, how's that a winning position? Superman could've just punched in the sun except earth and would've ended that disaster of a story. A neck wound that didn't stop him from talking, meh. He's fought without a heart before.
Pretty likely, considering she was already dealing him significant damage before that point. Without the ability to defend himself nearly as well, the damage is going to pile up faster.
A neck wound that, given half a minute to let his healing work, was healed enough to allow talking.
And she's fought while impaled and blinded before, where the flesh has been peeled off her bones by sorcery, and so on.
What booster gold experiences are divergent timelines, here the main timeline got changed and changed back. So diana had lasso of truth, her bracers, her sword, shield but since she didn't wore panties, she was different?
There are plenty of alt-worlds where the WW has those things. Almost every one, in fact. And it's not just the outfit, but that things happened different in that world meaning her experiences are different. That Diana might've never temporarily been ascended to a god, or fought half the foes she did to gain experience, or gotten some of the power boosts she received.
And the main timeline changing and changing back is what Booster Gold deals with too. Or the JSA, or everyone else.
That's actually normal.
Excellent logic. Superman and batman also imprisoned deadman and mention that zatanna was still a powerful magician, so your theory fails here too.
Yeeeea, you do realize this applies to, like, half of the non-canon timelines out there?
Tons of timelines have most of the people look the same and have similar roles.
Also, I didn't tell you because I don't want to. You can think whatever you want for all I care. Its perfectly canon and perfectly usable.
Ok, but if you don't explain, then you aren't actually using it in the debate.
Saying "I could win a debate with this, but I don't want to," does in fact mean you aren't winning a debate with it. You could be right, could be wrong, but it's just ceding the field.