COUNT DOOKU & GENERAL KENOBI vs DARTH SIDEOUS

Originally posted by Nephthys
Which is why we have rules about contradictions 8etween them. :I

We shouldn't.

In that case. :::;]

Well in that case the movie takes precedence, because that's a direct contradiction, just like the number of strikes Grievous did pretty directly contradicts that he was overloading Kenobi's defenses with 20 strikes a second.

Rules Lawyer AWAAAAAY!!!!!!!!

Spoiler:
All are cases of direct contradiction and would all, therefore, fail application of your enormously uptight standards.

You, sir, fail as a rules lawyer.

The defense rests.*

*with your mother, sexually

Victory belongs to the Tempest!

V for Victory!
V for Peace!

L for Loser!

Concession accepted.

That, sir, is not an L but is in fact a less-than sign.

I accept your concession and move to strike.*

your mother, sexually

L for Liberty!

Nope, its an L for Loser and for

LLLLLLLLAAAAAAAAMMMMMMMMEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!

Originally posted by Jinsoku Takai
Neither did Kenobi according to the highest form of canon. Like Nepthys reported:

Actually it doesn't say that at all. Just beause the movie doesn't show sequences of speed or force the same way as the book.. doesn't mean it wasn't shown and therefore didn't happen. That is about as illogical a point as I can think. Many things can't be properly shown in the movies like books. The books expand on what we saw... and therefore, kenobi DID in fact block such a sequence via canon.

JT and Neph if we go by the speed we see in the films then Grievous has much faster striking power than Sidious or Mace.

So you sure you want to go down that path?

Preciously DP.. that is exactly what I'm saying...

Originally posted by DARTH POWER
JT and Neph if we go by the speed we see in the films then Grievous has much faster striking power than Sidious or Mace.

So you sure you want to go down that path?

Did you receive my PM?

Originally posted by iheartchael
Did you receive my PM?

Yeah just chill out man.

Originally posted by DARTH POWER
JT and Neph if we go by the speed we see in the films then Grievous has much faster striking power than Sidious or Mace.

So you sure you want to go down that path?

No, because as I said this has been explicitly explained by the authority on Canon, Leland Chee.

A better reason would be that the general is clearly no longer meant to be the unstoppable war machine the ROTS novel suggested he was.

But cherrypicking whose feats do and do not count is unnecessary.

Cherrypicking feats so that I win is my entire schtick 8a8y.

But what use is that when you lose anyways? excellent

I'll 8e sure to tell you when it happens.

Then you should have been telling me since December 29th, 2007. You have a lot of explaining to do.

Originally posted by Nephthys
No, because as I said this has been explicitly explained by the authority on Canon, Leland Chee.

Yes he said they don't move at the exact speed we visually see in the movies.

But why should that apply differently to Grievous?

Grievous's speed shown was actually much closer to the way he's described than what we see from Sidious and Mace.

Grievous is described as moving so fast he teleports in the novel. 😐

Originally posted by The_Tempest
Then you should have been telling me since December 29th, 2007. You have a lot of explaining to do.

Ye8h!???????? W8ll you c8n just expl8in yours8lf to an empty 8ed tonight douch88g!!!!!!!!

Also:

FUUUUUUUUCK AUTOPL8 VIDEOS!!!!!!!!

Teleporting fast? What?

Yeah that video's annoying me too!