Originally posted by mnat801
Give example please.
CW movie and CW Episode "Crisis on Naboo". Dooku's attacks Anakin with the Force plenty of times but can not take him out.
With Obi-Wan on the other hand, it just takes a mere flick of the wrist for Dooku to destroy him with the Force.
So now you tell me, who can tank Force attacks better, Obi-Wan or Anakin?
Originally posted by mnat801
Hahahaha you can't just say he wasn't fighting to the best of his ability. Otherwise I could just say obi wan wasn't either. Plus it is clear that he was putting everything out against obi wan.
I'm saying IF YOUR CLAIMING that they both took the force push just as well then Obviously Anakin wasn't tanking force attacks as well as he usually can, so obviously Anakin wasn't as powerful as he usually is.
And going all out does not necessarily mean he was able to "Focus" all his power while going all out.
Originally posted by mnat801
OK i'll give you that. But that still does't make him superior, because we see in TCW that asajj forced choked both obi wan and anakin, so in your logic that means shes superior to both of them.
Yes, in that fight, in that situation and in that scenario Ventress was the superior combatant.
Originally posted by mnat801
I never said that!?I'm not arguing who did the harder kick.
Ah right that wasn't you. Your the one who claimed Obi-Wan could macth Maul in the FORCE!
Originally posted by mnat801
Yes that's correct, but he didn't kill him, as we see obi wan's counter to the force choke.
It was hardly a planned counter Lol. Anakin almost killed Obi-Wan. He almost choked him to death. What did Obi-Wan do that was anywhere near as damaging to Anakin at that point? Nothing. So Anakin was winning the fight. But he just hadn't WON yet.
Originally posted by mnat801
Again, you are wrong. Anakin/Vader has an offensive style of fighting, and obi wan has a defensive style of fighting. It's not in obi wan's character to use offensive against anakin like the ataru he used against maul, especially when he is reluctant to kill him. Refer to the Ali vs Foreman fight, foreman was forcing ali back at times, but in the end ali was the better fighter. This immediately proves that your statement of "someone forcing their opponent back clearly means they are superior" is wrong. If you were in fact right, anakin would have eventually killed obi wan.
No I've got the script to back me up. Your the one making stuff up.
And don't try and use my example against me FOOL!
Ali took hits from Foreman ON PURPOSE! And then it was Foreman who was SO TIRED that Ali easily knocked him out.
Yes Obi-Wan is a defensive fighter and would give ground anyway, but in our example it was Anakin who was FORCING Obi-Wan backwards. He wasn't just voluntarily giving ground due to his style. He had no choice. And then it was Obi-Wan who was getting tired. Anakin wasn't tired at all and was probably only getting stronger.
Plus the kick to the face and the choke show Anakin coming much closer to taking Obi-Wan out than Vice Versa.
So Obi-Wan needed to get outside where the terrain was all over the place. He was never going to win the fight on flat ground.
Originally posted by mnat801
These are not all combat specific,
Bingo!
Apart from rushing at Dooku when he was a PADAWAN, none of the examples you gave were combat specific.
So you have given Zero examples of JEDI KNIGHT Anakin making dumb combat moves as I knew you would. Whereas I've given you an example of Anakin's Rashness proving superior to Obi-Wan's more "sensible" approach in combat, and in the same exmaple Anakin outsmarted the enemy where Obi-Wan apparently could not.
Obi-Wan certainly keeps a Cooler head which is certainly beneficial in combat and intense scenarios.
But that doesn't make him smarter than Anakin. I've shown you how smart Anakin can be evn in his rashness.