Originally posted by quanchi112
I know. So Dumbledore fell for it. Shame. His wand never obeyed him and he called off the attack for Harry one on one who played dead possum. Facts. Quit twisting the context.
Dumbledore didn't fall for it. He didn't know. He isn't omniscient no one in th eHarry Potter universe is u less you are God. Notice whenever he used the wand voldemort himself stated this that the wand didn't work properly. Facts. Just give up you have lost.
Originally posted by quanchi112
False.I used the word to describe how he tactically took over the wizarding world. I correctly used it, dummy.
So you deny the obvious that Voldemort fought Dumbledore. You're a brick wall. Incapable of thought.
And the flames begin because you were once again proven incorrect and are attempting to distract away from that with a flame-war.
Originally posted by Robtard
You flame and insult in every thread as a means to detract away from your awful debating and inability to show how your favorite wins.
#calledit
Originally posted by EmperorSidious2We see his arm gesture forward. He never lost hold of his wand. It is your interpretation vs. mine and yours is illogical and treats Dumbledore like an idiotic fool.
He was slashing his hands around.You can't fight the facts. This isn't my interpretation this is just the facts.
Whether he is awesome is a matter of opinion and does not help your argument. You make it sound as if just because he couldn't do anything that doesn't make him powerful. So if that's the case voldemort isn't as powerful as he couldn't take out mcgonagall when they fought one on one for a period of time.
Author> special features. If the author says Dumbledore is the most powerful than that's just it.
Voldemort never fought her in the films. This isn't the books. Quit breaking the rules. I make it sound as if Voldemort is a better wizards because he clearly is. Greater feats, more people feared him, made himself immortal, etc.
Originally posted by EmperorSidious2He died. There was a trap in place. He was mortally fated to die. Voldemorts trick caused Dumbledore to die sooner or later. One year. Despite the wand resisting he broke the hogwarts Shield. 🙂
Dumbledore didn't fall for it. He didn't know. He isn't omniscient no one in th eHarry Potter universe is u less you are God. Notice whenever he used the wand voldemort himself stated this that the wand didn't work properly. Facts. Just give up you have lost.
Originally posted by RobtardBs. You are speculating. Who is to say Dumbledore couldn't fight for his freedom the right manner. You just speculated and made shit up. Fanfic Robbie has struck again.
The hell, it's like you didn't actually watch the film. If Dumbledore had let himself be taken and not slapped down the wizards trying to arrest him before fleeing, Voldermort would have likely won in the end. No special training for Harry. No hunting down of Horcruxes etc.Unfortunately I do read what you write and it's the reason I can so easily slap-down your nonsense.
The film > what you imagine
😂
Originally posted by quanchi112
Bs. You are speculating. Who is to say Dumbledore couldn't fight for his freedom the right manner. You just speculated and made shit up. Fanfic Robbie has struck again.😂
So you didn't actually pay attention to the story, how embarrassing for you. Dumbledore wasn't going to kill anyone and as I've explained to you three times now, he couldn't allow himself to be captured, too much was at stake. So what would fighting them before fleeing have accomplished?
Originally posted by quanchi112
We see his arm gesture forward. He never lost hold of his wand. It is your interpretation vs. mine and yours is illogical and treats Dumbledore like an idiotic fool.Voldemort never fought her in the films. This isn't the books. Quit breaking the rules. I make it sound as if Voldemort is a better wizards because he clearly is. Greater feats, more people feared him, made himself immortal, etc.
No. This is facts vs your interpretation. Facts always win. Also you are fighting a losing battle. You have no real proof that voldemort is better just your opinion while mine is popular opinion/ factually proven.
Originally posted by RobtardI didn't say he had to. The kids failed in that film and needed rescuing by the adults. You speculated and fanficed the rest. Robbie debating 101. More fanfic screen captions.
So you didn't actually pay attention to the story, how embarrassing for you. Dumbledore wasn't going to kill anyone and as I've explained to you three times now, he couldn't allow himself to be captured, too much was at stake. So what would fighting them before fleeing have accomplished?
Originally posted by quanchi112
He died. There was a trap in place. He was mortally fated to die. Voldemorts trick caused Dumbledore to die sooner or later. One year. Despite the wand resisting he broke the hogwarts Shield. 🙂
He did die due to Snape. Well that doesn't help your case as voldemort has his own wand and has displayed what he can with that so we know what his limits are.
Originally posted by EmperorSidious2No, you don't. I have feats, evidence, duel, and special features. Movie evidence>>>your wishful thinking.
No. This is facts vs your interpretation. Facts always win. Also you are fighting a losing battle. You have no real proof that voldemort is better just your opinion while mine is popular opinion/ factually proven.
Originally posted by quanchi112
I didn't say he had to. The kids failed in that film and needed rescuing by the adults. You speculated and fanficed the rest. Robbie debating 101. More fanfic screen captions.
You said Dumbledore fled because he was a coward and that he could have allowed himself to be captured instead. Which as pointed out, means you didn't pay attention to the story. Being captured would have meant a win for Voldermort, as no special training for Harry or hunting of the Horcruxes could have happened with Dumbledore out of the picture. This is too easy.
edit: Now you know who could have fought and fought to kill but decided to run away instead? Yeah, you know it's Voldermort 🙂
Originally posted by quanchi112
We see his arm gesture forward. He never lost hold of his wand. It is your interpretation vs. mine and yours is illogical and treats Dumbledore like an idiotic fool.Voldemort never fought her in the films. This isn't the books. Quit breaking the rules. I make it sound as if Voldemort is a better wizards because he clearly is. Greater feats, more people feared him, made himself immortal, etc.
We see him slashing case closed. What does him losing hai wand prove. No one was trying to disarm the other. Dumbledore was trying to drown him while voldemort was trying to escape. Your interpretation is foolish and illogical. Mine is based on facts and well rounded inferences.
We never see him but what do you think people do in the time we don't see them just sit there. Besides JK Rowling feels very strongly about that and she wants that in there whether or not we see it, it's there. Dumbledore is clearly the more powerful. Voldemort has no fears that Dumbledore can't counter. Dumbledore was a good guy so why would people fear him. If you cared to watch the 5th movie of the series clearly people were becoming scared of him. Becoming immortal, yes this is impressive however he couldn't make himself truly immortal could he? Making yourself immortal, I'm pretty sure anyone who is willing to go far enough could do it.
Originally posted by quanchi112
No, you don't. I have feats, evidence, duel, and special features. Movie evidence>>>your wishful thinking.
What evidence this is all your interpretation and opinion. Robtard beats you dude. Feats that are matched by Dumbledore, zero evidence, duel was a stalemate and Dumbledore was winning, special features<author.
Everyone else>>>>>>>>your wishful thinking.