Voldemort vs. Albus Dumbledore

Started by quanchi112183 pages

Originally posted by EmperorSidious2
You would ask me after we have gone through several post. The description of the battle which has three version book movie and video game, and k based it off the movie version. Also voldemort was already slashing so why would that make him drop it. It was part of it, but it was also Harry getting to close that made dumbledore push him back and break his concentration. This is proved in the description of the battle. Look upmBattle of the Ministry of Atrium.

2. Yet he couldn't get passed dumbledores defense and was getting frustrated. Your dictating the tempo is speculation as the flow of the battle went both ways with neither gaining a true advantage over the other. (If you wanna get nitpicking we can)

3. No you haven't. You just say I speculate. Saying something and explaining are two different things and all you have done is said I speculate. You haven't explained how. I'm above making silly comments anymore, you should be too.

4. Yea because consistently need me to as you don't understand or comprehend what you see.

6. I know it you. Quit ignoring evidence. I have embraced and took on and defeated any evidence you think you may have had, which was just one line from someone who doesn't have any influence on the movies.

8. I'm superior to you in these debates and I believe you have been around longer. That's shameful.

When wizards gesture with their wands they use magic. Albums saw this and knocked Harry back. Occam's razor.

2. You are free to disagree but him being in the offensive more is a fact.

3. Your opinion isn't a fact.

4. I have countered but you keep repeating yourself.

6. Where ?

8. You are delusional and dim witted. Embarrassing.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I already proved it.

A piece of his soul is inside the snake. Undeniable. You continue to deny facts as per your norm.

You refused to prove it like a coward again 😂

A piece of his soul is inside Harry too. So no proof?

Originally posted by juggerman
You refused to prove it like a coward again 😂

A piece of his soul is inside Harry too. So no proof?

A fragment of his soul is inside nagini. This was an intentional horcrux.

Intentional horcrux. Quit avoiding the similarities and saying the same dumb shit.

Originally posted by quanchi112
A fragment of his soul is inside nagini. This was an intentional horcrux.

Intentional horcrux. Quit avoiding the similarities and saying the same dumb shit.

A fragment of his soul is inside Harry. Quote something thats state there is a difference between ones made on purpose opposed to an accident

Originally posted by quanchi112
When wizards gesture with their wands they use magic. Albums saw this and knocked Harry back. Occam's razor.

2. You are free to disagree but him being in the offensive more is a fact.

3. Your opinion isn't a fact.

4. I have countered but you keep repeating yourself.

6. Where ?

8. You are delusional and dim witted. Embarrassing.

Speculation. He broke his concentration due to Harry being to close. Fact. Did you look up the Duel in the Ministry of Atrium.

2. Yes he was on the offense yet he couldn't penetrate dumbledore so du,bled ore way more impressive IMO.

3. Neither is yours. How does that relate to this topic. Concession accepted.

4. No you haven't. With that concession accepted.

6. Concession accepted. Your little special features opinion.

8. Concession accepted.

I was expecting more from my first win on this forum.

Dumbledore wins.

Originally posted by Stigma
Dumbledore wins.

Agreed

Yeah. Dumbledore is superior to Voldemort.

Bump. In one of those moods. Dumbledore beats tom while with difficulty he beats him.

Ass

Tom couldn't even beat a baby.

This is still going? Dumbledore, as always. Voldy needed to trick a kid into killing him to actually pull it off, and even that was Dumbledores plan all along lol.

Originally posted by juggerman
A fragment of his soul is inside Harry. Quote something thats state there is a difference between ones made on purpose opposed to an accident
Harry isn't the same thing as nagini nor as durable.

The differences have already been noted.

Originally posted by EmperorSidious2
Speculation. He broke his concentration due to Harry being to close. Fact. Did you look up the Duel in the Ministry of Atrium.

2. Yes he was on the offense yet he couldn't penetrate dumbledore so du,bled ore way more impressive IMO.

3. Neither is yours. How does that relate to this topic. Concession accepted.

4. No you haven't. With that concession accepted.

6. Concession accepted. Your little special features opinion.

8. Concession accepted.

I was expecting more from my first win on this forum.

Prove it.

2. Speculation.

3. Make sense.

4. Irony.

6. No, that's a fact.

8. More irony.

You've never won anything in your life.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Prove it.

2. Speculation.

3. Make sense.

4. Irony.

6. No, that's a fact.

8. More irony.

You've never won anything in your life.

He won your girlfriend

Originally posted by Tattoos N Scars
He won your girlfriend
Shut up, dummy.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Shut up, dummy.

Painful memories, huh lol

Originally posted by Tattoos N Scars
Painful memories, huh lol
Quit being strange.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Prove it.

2. Speculation.

3. Make sense.

4. Irony.

6. No, that's a fact.

8. More irony.

You've never won anything in your life.

Voldemort was still in the bubble when he slashed, and we see Dumbledore break it because Harry got to close.

2. No it's not. AK vs Expelliarmius win for Dumbleodre/stalemate, fire snake vs
, dumbleodre win and he sent it back, then encased him in water, then Harry got in the way and he had to break his concentration, DD blocked his dark magic and turned his glass to sand and made Voldemort flee to possess Harry.

3. You conceded on this,front, and how,can I make sense when you didn't even relate to the topic.

4. See what I mean you just say irony when you lose to attempt to cover yourself but you still lose.

6. The rules say movies only right? We can't use Lucas commentary for Star Wars versus here so I'm pretty sure we can't use commentary as evidence. Also you do understand the person who said that has no bearing on how the movies worked and GOT HER FACTS FROM THE BOOK. That even of itself doesn't prove who is more powerful.

8. Keep on proving my point.

Accept every debate we have ever been in.

Originally posted by EmperorSidious2
Voldemort was still in the bubble when he slashed, and we see Dumbledore break it because Harry got to close.

2. No it's not. AK vs Expelliarmius win for Dumbleodre/stalemate, fire snake vs
, dumbleodre win and he sent it back, then encased him in water, then Harry got in the way and he had to break his concentration, DD blocked his dark magic and turned his glass to sand and made Voldemort flee to possess Harry.

3. You conceded on this,front, and how,can I make sense when you didn't even relate to the topic.

4. See what I mean you just say irony when you lose to attempt to cover yourself but you still lose.

6. The rules say movies only right? We can't use Lucas commentary for Star Wars versus here so I'm pretty sure we can't use commentary as evidence. Also you do understand the person who said that has no bearing on how the movies worked and GOT HER FACTS FROM THE BOOK. That even of itself doesn't prove who is more powerful.

8. Keep on proving my point.

Accept every debate we have ever been in.

We see it break after Voldemort slashed. Why would Dumbledore break the hold if he was protecting Harry ?

2. Nonsense.

3. How did I ?

4. No, it is ironic.

6. Special features from the film. Counts, sport. You not figuring out the obvious they explain is your own problem.

8. You've never proven a point in your life.

Dude, I bet you can't even tie your own shoes yet.