Originally posted by juggermanNot at all. Kylo was better than Vader but he did have his own embarrassing moments in the film.
Really?You did ignore it. I can post the links if you'd like. You fought against a stance in one thread and then took the same exact stance you fought against in another.
So you missed the part where Albus was protecting Harry did you? Tom was single minded in his attempt at achieving his goal(killing Dumbledore which he stated) and he failed. After he failed he switched it up. Hardly the same
Did you miss the part where Voldemort was attacking Harry so moot point.
He did believe he'd be dead by then and be gone. Voldemort didn't come there for Albus though he came there for Harry. He knew his time was limited before the backup arrived. He was after Harry not Albus. Albus didn't survive much longer anyways the old coward.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Not at all. Kylo was better than Vader but he did have his own embarrassing moments in the film.Did you miss the part where Voldemort was attacking Harry so moot point.
He did believe he'd be dead by then and be gone. Voldemort didn't come there for Albus though he came there for Harry. He knew his time was limited before the backup arrived. He was after Harry not Albus. Albus didn't survive much longer anyways the old coward.
Yeah you did. Shall I post the links showing you defending things you later tried to use in defense of Khan?
He attacked Harry after he realized he couldn't beat Albus. An Albus that had his attention split
Soooooo he was wrong and failed at his objective?
Originally posted by juggermanMy comments are relative to who he is facing.
Yeah you did. Shall I post the links showing you defending things you later tried to use in defense of Khan?He attacked Harry after he realized he couldn't beat Albus. An Albus that had his attention split
Soooooo he was wrong and failed at his objective?
Spider-Man is awesome when facing Daredevil but not awesome when Galactus faces him he isn't.
He was sending sparks at him when they were exchanging blasts. Voldemort was always after Harry there. Albus came there to confront him.
Voldemort needed more time and Albus later died. Look at that finger Albus because you're ****ed old man.
Originally posted by quanchi112
My comments are relative to who he is facing.Spider-Man is awesome when facing Daredevil but not awesome when Galactus faces him he isn't.
He was sending sparks at him when they were exchanging blasts. Voldemort was always after Harry there. Albus came there to confront him.
Voldemort needed more time and Albus later died. Look at that finger Albus because you're ****ed old man.
Which shows the bias.
Well that's a little different. IOW it would be like you hyping up the fact Spiderman is a bullet timer against DD but then saying "oh well he got tagged so he's not even a bullet timer" when he's against Galactus. See the difference now?
Those sparks were all over the place. It's just as likely he was hoping a stray bolt hit Albus.
Voldemort failed in his attempt. Dumbledore successfully saved Harry and defended himself.
Originally posted by juggermanNo, it is just relative. This is opinion based off of facts and logic. Everyone presents their case and I never ignore the facts. Ever.
Which shows the bias.Well that's a little different. IOW it would be like you hyping up the fact Spiderman is a bullet timer against DD but then saying "oh well he got tagged so he's not even a bullet timer" when he's against Galactus. See the difference now?
Those sparks were all over the place. It's just as likely he was hoping a stray bolt hit Albus.
Voldemort failed in his attempt. Dumbledore successfully saved Harry and defended himself.
So you don't think he was going after Harry as well. Figures.
Dumbledore later was fatally wounded by Voldemort magic and Albus had the best wand ever created. He still couldn't best Voldemort. 🙂
Albus failed to stop the possession so he failed. 🙂
Originally posted by quanchi112
No, it is just relative. This is opinion based off of facts and logic. Everyone presents their case and I never ignore the facts. Ever.So you don't think he was going after Harry as well. Figures.
Dumbledore later was fatally wounded by Voldemort magic and Albus had the best wand ever created. He still couldn't best Voldemort. 🙂
Albus failed to stop the possession so he failed. 🙂
You interpret scenes differently depending on which side you argue for.
I think he was trying to kill Albus and failed
Him being wounded late has no bearing on this fight
Albus didn't try to stop it but he did coach Harry in resisting it. So another win I guess
Originally posted by juggermanI interpret differently based off who they are up against which is what everyone should do.
You interpret scenes differently depending on which side you argue for.I think he was trying to kill Albus and failed
Him being wounded late has no bearing on this fight
Albus didn't try to stop it but he did coach Harry in resisting it. So another win I guess
You said Albus was trying to protect Harry and he was powerless to stop the possession.
It shows how irrevelant Albus was.
He did help but he was powerless to stop Voldemort. I've always said Voldemort was greater in terms of abilities and this is just another feat which confirms it.
Originally posted by quanchi112
I interpret differently based off who they are up against which is what everyone should do.You said Albus was trying to protect Harry and he was powerless to stop the possession.
It shows how irrevelant Albus was.
He did help but he was powerless to stop Voldemort. I've always said Voldemort was greater in terms of abilities and this is just another feat which confirms it.
See that's the problem. You can't interpret differently like that and no see your bias. Again that would be like me harping up and down about Hancock's banks scene speed in one debate and then downplaying it in another cuz I like that other guy more. It's asinine
He did protect Harry. He stood between Harry and Tom and won
He was so irrelevant that Vold couldn't even take him in 1 on 1.
Actually he helped Harry beat Vold. Again that's a loss for Tom
Originally posted by juggermanFalse. If someone is fast but they are up against the flash they are obviously slow in comparison. Relativity my friend.
See that's the problem. You can't interpret differently like that and no see your bias. Again that would be like me harping up and down about Hancock's banks scene speed in one debate and then downplaying it in another cuz I like that other guy more. It's asinineHe did protect Harry. He stood between Harry and Tom and won
He was so irrelevant that Vold couldn't even take him in 1 on 1.
Actually he helped Harry beat Vold. Again that's a loss for Tom
He was unable to stop the possession. Failed.
Voldemort dominated him but chose to go after Harry in the limited time he had left.
He didn't have to his magical trap already sealed the deal.
He was dead, dude. A host of others aided Harry not just Albus. 😂
Originally posted by quanchi112
False. If someone is fast but they are up against the flash they are obviously slow in comparison. Relativity my friend.He was unable to stop the possession. Failed.
Voldemort dominated him but chose to go after Harry in the limited time he had left.
He didn't have to his magical trap already sealed the deal.
He was dead, dude. A host of others aided Harry not just Albus. 😂
Except that's not what you are doing. Saying someone is a bullet timer in one thread and then saying they aren't or can't do that in another is more like what you do. Big difference bra
He helped Harry stop it. Win
Voldemort was on the losing end. Albus blocked or countered it all and had the upperhand even tho he played defensively. Pretty clear cut Tom lost
That was later and has bearing on this.
He wasn't dead when he helped Harry fight off the possession. And even after death he helped. Now that's power
Originally posted by juggermanThat is misrepresenting my argument. The facts didn't change just who they are up against.
Except that's not what you are doing. Saying someone is a bullet timer in one thread and then saying they aren't or can't do that in another is more like what you do. Big difference braHe helped Harry stop it. Win
Voldemort was on the losing end. Albus blocked or countered it all and had the upperhand even tho he played defensively. Pretty clear cut Tom lost
That was later and has bearing on this.
He wasn't dead when he helped Harry fight off the possession. And even after death he helped. Now that's power
He aided in talking but magically was unable to do anything. Fact. 🙂
No, he was not. Albus was in a submissive position because he wasn't the one dictating the battle.
Many ghosts can still interact after death but he was physically unable to stop Voldemort. Quit ignoring the context.
Originally posted by quanchi112
That is misrepresenting my argument. The facts didn't change just who they are up against.He aided in talking but magically was unable to do anything. Fact. 🙂
No, he was not. Albus was in a submissive position because he wasn't the one dictating the battle.
Many ghosts can still interact after death but he was physically unable to stop Voldemort. Quit ignoring the context.
That's what you do.
That has nothing to do with a 1 on 1 match between the two
Albus countered and blocked Vold easily. He even put Vold in the bubble where as Vold was unable to gain any upperhand on Albus
He helped a lot. But again this has nothing to do with a 1 on 1 match between the two
Originally posted by juggermanI already explained relativity here.
That's what you do.That has nothing to do with a 1 on 1 match between the two
Albus countered and blocked Vold easily. He even put Vold in the bubble where as Vold was unable to gain any upperhand on Albus
He helped a lot. But again this has nothing to do with a 1 on 1 match between the two
He didn't do so easily. Albus was on his ass. Voldemort let broke free and didn't even hesitate to respond with an attack of his won.
He was unable to magically stop Voldemort. Voldemort looked superior regardless.