Originally posted by Galan007
You're putting words in my mouth. I never said Palpatine 'needed' to separate the Brothers. I said he 'opted' to separate the Brothers-- and if he 'opted' to separate them, logic dictates that he would 'opt' to separate RotS Anakin/Kenobi as well(if he were to engage them in strict lightsaber combat, that is.) Why? Because RotS Anakin/Kenobi present a much bigger threat than Maul/Savage.
Originally posted by Galan007
You're putting words in my mouth yet again. Dooku clearly wanted to keep Kenobi and Anakin separate for a reason-- I've never questioned the fact that they were definitely a threat to him as a team. All I'm saying is that Dooku obviously wasn't as powerless as some have claimed when he summoned the droids, given how effortlessly he tooled the duo atop the platform immediately afterward
You're accusing me of something I haven't done. At no time in this debate have I put words in your mouth.
Originally posted by The_Tempest
His point, like mine, is that Dooku separated his opponents out of necessity whereas Sidious did not.
^This is basically what I was getting at, which is why I didn't understand why you would compare Palpatine separating the brothers to Dooku separating Anakin and Kenobi, unless you were suggesting that Dooku did not need to.
Originally posted by Galan007
And yeah, I know he could have tooled the Brothers with the force(I've said as much several times now.) A force battle, however, isn't what I've been talking about.
I know, I've read your thoughts on that fight. I was just using Palpatine's neglected use of the force to back up my point: Palpatine obviously did not feel as if he needed to separate them.
Originally posted by Galan007
Feat-wise, RotS Kenobi+Anakin>>>Kolar+Tiin+Fisto. Unarguable.
They have more feats, yeah. However Quantity is not always > quality.
However, I do agree that Anakin and Kenobi make a greater team than the three masters. Their combined feats suggest it, IMO. But that's beside the point, unless they have Windu alongside them.
Point is: if Palpatine didn't need to separate the three masters from Windu in order to kill all of them, then I'm not seeing why he would choose to separate Obi Wan from Anakin.
Originally posted by Galan007
That said, Palpatine opting not to separate the latter, has no bearing whatsoever on what he'd opt for with the former.
What? You're not even being reasonable really. I can basically say the same about your argument: Palpatine opting to separate the brothers has no bearing whatsoever on what he'd opt for with Anakin and Obi Wan.
Originally posted by Galan007
Again: If Palpatine chose to separate Maul and Savage in a saber match, logic dictates that he would choose to separate Anakin and Kenobi in a saber match as well-- they are, afterall, a significantly better team.
Logic did not dictate that chose to separate the three jedi masters from Windu.
In a vs. forum, I do not go by what a character might choose to do, I go by what the character is capable of doing. So unless I am to assume that Palpatine would toy around with Anakin and Obi Wan (the same way he was toying with the Maul & Savage), and trying not to kill one of them (the same way he wasn't trying to kill Maul), I don't see how Palpatine's fight with Maul and Savage has any bearing on what he would do to Anakin and Kenobi. And if he can kill three jedi master without separating them from Windu, I don't see why he wouldn't just cut down Kenobi mid-duel without opting to separate him from Anakin.
Originally posted by Galan007
I think you two are getting defensive because you think I'm comparing Dooku to Palpatine from a power/skill standpoint.
That's why this debate turned out the way it did. You're allowing your wrongful assumptions to interfere with the debate, and it's causing you to look past the point.
That said, I think I'll just leave this debate alone.