Originally posted by zopzop
He tanked an ALTERNATE version of the UN. The 616 version of the UN was capable of destroying Abraxas and undoing the MULTIVERSAL level damage he wrecked. Show me proof that that alt reality UN was as powerful as the 616 version.
Not sure what this supposed to prove. First of all, there is doubt over whether it was even an alternate UN or the 616 version given how it was last seen in Reed's hands coupled with the fact that Val has a tendency to mess with her dad's stuff. But for the sake of the argument, let's presume that it was an alternate UN. How exactly does the feat get diminished, when we have seen an alternate UN erase a whole reality on 2 different occasions(Korvac and the dying Eternity)?
Originally posted by zopzop
Tiamut wasn't fighting 3 no names and an Eson. Tiamut was going up against the "mightiest" of the Celestials and HAD HIM ON HIS KNEES when the rest of the Second Host jumped in. Not four no names, NAMED Celestials jumped in after the "mightiest" of them was on his knees before Tiamut :
Again with this bullsh1t. This mightiest of the 4th Host recently got dropped by an Asgardian enchanted axe, while it took a universal weapon to put down a random Mad Celestial. Those 4 "non-name alternate Rogues" had more feats in 2 or 3 issues than the 616-Celestials have had in decades, and the reason that you either ignore or outright lowball those instances is because you can't take the implications of such a notion.
Originally posted by zopzop
You countered nothing and are just rambling at this point.
Irony abounds.
Originally posted by zopzop
You have yet to prove it was a Godblast that Team Thor used against the Trio (Galactus/Scrier/The OTher) in that Thor Annual. If/when you prove that, you have to prove it was MORE powerful than the Godblast Thor used against Exitar. The Godblast Thor used against Exitar SHATTERED a REINFORCED Mjolnir. Mjlonir survived the strain of that blast Team used against the Trio. Explain how out of all the Godblasts Thor has ever done on panel (even ASSUMING the did one with Rachel/Surfer), the only time A (REINFORCED) MJOLNIR was shattered was the one used against Exitar.
It was a GB based on narrative description. It was being empowered by 2 other Heralds aas well, hence an amped GB. It failed to make a dent on Galactus, while a regular(albeit Thor's strongest) one destroyed Exitar's most durable body part. I am guessing you'll keep spamming this point on and on ad infinitum no matter how many times I address it.
As far as the strength of the Exitar Godblast goes, do you want me to bring up our age old argument where you spammed nonsense for pages on regarding how the Juggernaut Godblast was equal to the Exitar Godblast in magnitude, simply because of narrative description? I don't want to invoke ODG's brutality and set you on a self-arguing/destroying path, but you're leaving me out of options here.
Originally posted by zopzop
Regarding the entropy gun, I merely pointed out that according to Reed on panel, the reason why it was so effective is because the Rogues bleed energy. Well Galactus "bleeds" energy or blood too depending on the writer. So if that's the reason why it was so effective against the Celestials.........put two and two together. Even you can understand this.
And I countered that by bringing up what would happen to Galactus at the Heat Death of the Universe. I then specifically told you to google what the Heat Death means, because of it's close relation to Reed's Univeral Entropy weapon. You blatantly disregarded my advice and went on a stupid off-tangent blabbering(which I'll crush below) about the Celestials' multiversal nature(courtesy of Pak). I am not sure whether you have some neural impairments, or you're doing this to simply annoy me.
Originally posted by zopzop
The "Heat Death" garbage you brought up was just that garbage. Surviving till the end of a SINGLE universe isn't impressive when you compare it to beings that are MULTIVERSAL in scope. Understand?
First of all, don't ever tell anyone that what they post on here is garbage, because the only garbage that has been flung about on this thread so far has been spouted by you. You're the same
idiotguy who argued for pages on and on that Reed was omniscient, you're the same
buffoonfellow who once argued that Thor can stalemate Mephisto in his own realm, you're the same
dumbassdude who tried to argue that Odin>LT, you're the same
retardperson who blindly went into ODG's bait thread and ended up arguing with yourself for 3 continuous pages and making a fool of yourself in the process.
Still stuck on that multiversal non-sequiter, I see.
Originally posted by zopzop
Also that scan straight up says, Death would have claimed Galactus IF STRANGE'S aura wasn't stopping her. Read the entire issue, that point is made clear as day.And I also gave you examples of Galactus getting his fat pulled from the fire MULTIPLE times. So IF he really does survive to the heat death of the universe (all this merely being IMPLIED), it's because other beings have already saved his ass and probably will save his ass again in the future.
More irrelevant crap. What does you bringing up the Abstract Embodiment of Death needing to keep Galactus in a dissipated state have to do with anything here, particularly when that same Abstract embodiment of Death outperformed nearly 2 dozen Celestials(616 at that) against Cancerverse.
Originally posted by zopzop
The Celestials don't need anyone saving them. Even the "death" of one of their aspects in any given universe is meaningless since they exist simultaneously in ALL universes in the multiverse. Understand now?
Tell that to Tiamut who was drained and destroyed by an energy tick. Or Arishem who got killed by an Asgardian enchanted axe.