Can the Sword of Gryffindor destroy Sauron's ring ?

Originally posted by quanchi112
Who cares ? The basilisk venom is a part of the sword now. I never said it was invincible I said it destroys the ring. Name me one resistance feat which proves otherwise.

What? Basilisk Venom only worked because it specifically targets horcruxes. It doesn't strengthen any substance it touches, especially to a level needed to destroy the ring.

Originally posted by juggerman
This makes sense 👆

Originally posted by Lestov16
What? Basilisk Venom only worked because it specifically targets horcruxes. It doesn't strengthen any substance it touches, especially to a level needed to destroy the ring.

The point is, there is no proof that basalisk vemon would destroy the ring.

And the proof that basilisk venom can destroy the One Ring is where?

edit: SM beat me to it.

I explained it earlier. Guess that was just ignored.

Originally posted by Scarlet Fox
I explained it earlier. Guess that was just ignored.

Your argument was that a Horcrux and the One Ring are one and the same. When they clearly aren't. The One Ring is a powerful weapon imbued with Sauron's anger, malice and will; A Horcrux is a vessel to store a piece of a soul.

Yet Voldemort was able to project his Anger, Malice, and Will by the Horcrux. So I do not see a difference.

Originally posted by Scarlet Fox
Yet Voldemort was able to project his Anger, Malice, and Will by the Horcrux. So I do not see a difference.

That's a reach. I do like this new approach though. The One Ring is just a Horcrux and basilisk venom can destroy it. It's cute.

Tell me, would Potter have turned into a little Golem like creature, since he was a Horcrux?

Whats cute is you skitting around the rest of what is said. We are not talking about Baslisk Venom. We are talking about a Magically imbued sword that just happened to have absored the Strength from Basalisk Vemon. Never did anyone say the Sword has Basalisk vemon on it or dispenses it.

You and Quanchi know how I am. I will go with facts presented by each area wether I agree with you or not. Sometimes I disagree heavily with Quanchi and sometimes I agree with him. This just happens to be one of the times I agree.

A Third party could sit outside of this and say that is impossible to tell if it could or not because it is impossible to compare the power of the LotR verse against the HP Verse.

But if you simply compare everything then it makes it simpler. In LotR the One Ring is played up because it was what the story was made around. In HP the Horcruxes were Downplayed because there was more then one of them. That does not mean that one is more powerful then the other. They are both seen as and item connected to its respective villian. Both items can bring back said person. Both items are known to project thoughts and feelings through touch of an outside party. I do not see anythign else on either side. So if the SoG is able to destroy the one in HP Verse then why not the one in LotR verse?

Originally posted by Robtard
Tell me, would Potter have turned into a little Golem like creature, since he was a Horcrux?

Umbridge

The fact that the One Ring had a tendency to corrupt people doesnt make it any stronger. Not to mention the Horcrux DID change the HP gang as they had on the Necklass. And Harry had an incredible power of will. Like many in the LotR Verse some were able to resist it. Like Aragon who is just a human.

Originally posted by Lestov16
What? Basilisk Venom only worked because it specifically targets horcruxes. It doesn't strengthen any substance it touches, especially to a level needed to destroy the ring.

What resistance feats does the ring have ?

Originally posted by Robtard
LoTR Lore > What you want. This is just a fact.

Feats you won't list and just insist "they're stronger!". You base your opinions on a severe lack of knowledge and blind fanaticism towards anything Harry Potter.

You have no proof the sword can do what Mount Doom did. Zero, slumo.

Potter magic seems more powerful than a dwarf failing to destroy the one ring. If that isn't the greatest resistance feat name one.

We go by resistance feats. Horcruxes have resisted better so logically the sword can destroy the ring just like Horcruxes.

I'm not seeing any proof that basilisk venom would destroy the ring, just baseless speculation.

Originally posted by Silent Master
I'm not seeing any proof that basilisk venom would destroy the ring, just baseless speculation.

I'm still not seeing any proof that basilisk venom would destroy the ring, just baseless speculation.

Originally posted by Silent Master
I'm still not seeing any proof that basilisk venom would destroy the ring, just baseless speculation.

Nice attempt to shift the burden, however you still haven't provided any proof that basilisk venom would destroy the ring.

Originally posted by Scarlet Fox
The fact that the One Ring had a tendency to corrupt people doesnt make it any stronger. Not to mention the Horcrux DID change the HP gang as they had on the Necklass. And Harry had an incredible power of will. Like many in the LotR Verse some were able to resist it. Like Aragon who is just a human.

Both Aragorn and Gandalf were afraid to hold the ring for any length of time, simply because they new they couldn't resist it's pull. Only the Bagginses were pure of heart enough to endure prolonged exposure to the ring. I'd definitely say that the ring's corruption powers are greater than the horcruxes.

Who is to say whether the one ring could even corrupt someone from another world since specific magic was created to rule Middle Earth.

For within these rings was bound the strength and will to govern each race.

Sauron forged a master ring to dominate these specific rings which only pertain to Middle Earth.

Horcruxes corrupt anyone who wears them and isn't tied into specific magic overpowering these other rings which only deals with Middle Earth.