Originally posted by Scarlet Fox
People seem to ignore the fact that the SoG is still a Magical Sword. Not only that but it only takes in that which makes it stronger. Not only has the SoG destroyed the undamagable in Harry Potter Universe. And since it is a MAGICAL Weapon if would survive for a few seconds if put into the lava at Mount Doom.. the same Lava used to FORGE the One Ring. With the SoG imbued with the magical fires of Mount doom I would say it would easily destroy the one ring.
Well...I'm not gonna post and say I know everything there is to LOTR and HP, but the one ring was magical right? At least thats what I'm guessing, and yet that melted in mount doom...well the sword may have magic but if a powerful ring such as the one ring would melt in the lava of mount doom wouldn't the sword do the same? Magic or no magic? keep in mind I'm just asking a question though more rather saying you're wrong or right
Originally posted by steverules_2The sword only takes in what makes it stronger while the ring doesn't.
Well...I'm not gonna post and say I know everything there is to LOTR and HP, but the one ring was magical right? At least thats what I'm guessing, and yet that melted in mount doom...well the sword may have magic but if a powerful ring such as the one ring would melt in the lava of mount doom wouldn't the sword do the same? Magic or no magic? keep in mind I'm just asking a question though more rather saying you're wrong or right
Originally posted by RobtardIt doesn't have to be. You have no resistance feats to even compare it to a Horcrux let alone this sword which easily destroys them.
By the fires of Mount Doom. The sword isn't like the fires of Mount Doom. 🙂
Most people don't think and just heartily accept the majority opinion. You're a lemming.
Originally posted by Scarlet Fox
People seem to ignore the fact that the SoG is still a Magical Sword. Not only that but it only takes in that which makes it stronger. Not only has the SoG destroyed the undamagable in Harry Potter Universe. And since it is a MAGICAL Weapon if would survive for a few seconds if put into the lava at Mount Doom.. the same Lava used to FORGE the One Ring. With the SoG imbued with the magical fires of Mount doom I would say it would easily destroy the one ring.
IOW, without being allowed to absorb the fires of Mt Doom, the sword cannot destroy the ring.
When the one ring was thrown into the lava in mount doom, it didn't instantly melt or get destroyed. It stayed there for half a minute before starting to melt. So even if the sword absorbed the powers of mt. doom, I doubt it can instantly destroy the ring, as the lava itself wasn't able to instantly destroy the ring.
If I really wanted to shatter that ring with a weapon, I would have preferred to use Mjolnir rather than the SoG.
Originally posted by quanchi112
It doesn't have to be. You have no resistance feats to even compare it to a Horcrux let alone this sword which easily destroys them.Most people don't think and just heartily accept the majority opinion. You're a lemming.
Watch LoTR. It indeed has to be the fires of Mount Doom. Stop making stuff up. 😂 Wrong. The sword doesn't "easily destroy" a horcrux, basilisk venom does and the sword happened to be amped by it.
You don't know anything about LoTR and you barely know the basics from HP.
Originally posted by Scarlet Fox
Because Lava doesnt melt everythign right away. Even when Golem fell into the lava I am sure he sufered a few seconds before he actually died. It was the power OF Mount Doom that was, one assumes, imbued in the lava. With that Power absorbed into the SoG then I think it would destroy the ring.
Which means, the sword by itself can't destroy the ring.
Originally posted by RobtardIt has to be Mount Doom in Lotr not including the Harry Potter universe. You need to think before you say the silliest things.
Watch LoTR. It indeed has to be the fires of Mount Doom. Stop making stuff up. 😂 Wrong. The sword doesn't "easily destroy" a horcrux, basilisk venom does and the sword happened to be amped by it.You don't know anything about LoTR and you barely know the basics from HP.
The sword makes that which makes it stronger a part of itself. It's a permanent amp. This is a property of the sword, nitwit.
I know the ring doesn't have any good resistance feats. You said earlier Fiendfyre destroyed a Horcrux because you heard it. You just hate Harry Potter and know next to nothing about it.
Originally posted by quanchi112
It has to be Mount Doom [B]in Lotr not including the Harry Potter universe. You need to think before you say the silliest things.The sword makes that which makes it stronger a part of itself. It's a permanent amp. This is a property of the sword, nitwit.
I know the ring doesn't have any good resistance feats. You said earlier Fiendfyre destroyed a Horcrux because you heard it. You just hate Harry Potter and know next to nothing about it. [/B]
And this is you just making stuff up again: "Harry Potter can beat the One Ring because I need it to". LoTR Lore > What you need.
😂 Are you suggesting the sword is going to destroy the One Ring because of it's basilisk venom amp? Prove it. Cos last time I checked, basilisk venom wasn't Mount Doom. Prove it or STFU.
Oh clever, another "no you!" retort. Anyhow. Prove your new claim above or STFU (I expect another dodge).
Originally posted by quanchi112
It doesn't have to be. You have no resistance feats to even compare it to a Horcrux let alone this sword which easily destroys them.
But the only reason the sword even effected the Horcrux was because it was doused in Basilisk's venom. The sword itself isn't invincible and if you say it is the burden of proof is on you.
Originally posted by Lestov16Who cares ? The basilisk venom is a part of the sword now. I never said it was invincible I said it destroys the ring. Name me one resistance feat which proves otherwise.
But the only reason the sword even effected the Horcrux was because it was doused in Basilisk's venom. The sword itself isn't invincible and if you say it is the burden of proof is on you.
The SoG, Amped up by absorbing the Magical Properties of the Fires of Mount Doom can destroy the ring.
However without the Amp of DOOM! I can not say wether or not it would.
However if you compare a Horcrux to the One Ring you can safley say both things held a soul. Voldemorts or Sauron... x.x I think i spelled it right.
Since the SoG could destroy of Horcrux, which is an item with a soul attached to it, I could pass along that it may be able to destroy the One ring since it is basically Saurons Horcrux. Even without Mount DOOM! amp.
According to what is said in LotR, the One Ring is what gave Sauron his power. When he was defeated a peice of him attached to the Ring just like a peice of Voldemort was attached to a Horcrux. and the SoG could destroy a Horcrux which was a Magically imbued item with Voldemorts soul attached. which is basically what the One Ring was for Sauron.
not to mention the weapons the Fellowship used to try and destroy it were neither special, like Aragons sword in RotK, or Magical.
Originally posted by RobtardLotr lore doesn't take into account other fictional universes. You're dense.
And this is you just making stuff up again: "Harry Potter can beat the One Ring because I need it to". LoTR Lore > What you need.😂 Are you suggesting the sword is going to destroy the One Ring because of it's basilisk venom amp? Prove it. Cos last time I checked, basilisk venom wasn't Mount Doom. Prove it or STFU.
Oh clever, another "no you!" retort. Anyhow. Prove your new claim above or STFU (I expect another dodge).
It's destroyed horcruxes which have greater resistance feats. I base my opinion off of facts you don't.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Lotr lore doesn't take into account other fictional universes. You're dense.It's destroyed horcruxes which have greater resistance feats. I base my opinion off of facts you don't.
LoTR Lore > What you want. This is just a fact.
Feats you won't list and just insist "they're stronger!". You base your opinions on a severe lack of knowledge and blind fanaticism towards anything Harry Potter.
You have no proof the sword can do what Mount Doom did. Zero, slumo.
Originally posted by Scarlet Fox
The SoG, Amped up by absorbing the Magical Properties of the Fires of Mount Doom can destroy the ring.However without the Amp of DOOM! I can not say wether or not it would.
However if you compare a Horcrux to the One Ring you can safley say both things held a soul. Voldemorts or Sauron... x.x I think i spelled it right.
Since the SoG could destroy of Horcrux, which is an item with a soul attached to it, I could pass along that it may be able to destroy the One ring since it is basically Saurons Horcrux. Even without Mount DOOM! amp.
According to what is said in LotR, the One Ring is what gave Sauron his power. When he was defeated a peice of him attached to the Ring just like a peice of Voldemort was attached to a Horcrux. and the SoG could destroy a Horcrux which was a Magically imbued item with Voldemorts soul attached. which is basically what the One Ring was for Sauron.
not to mention the weapons the Fellowship used to try and destroy it were neither special, like Aragons sword in RotK, or Magical.
This makes sense 👆