abhilegend
And it has been debunked by better scans and not by biased writers who don't nerf characters by their own admission.
"Better scans" in your book often includes ones where if you read the rest of the scene, Wonder Woman does a fair amount in return as well, and a fight where both sides get in their licks doesn't fit your precious point. "Better," notably, relies on willful blindness, while the scans you say they disprove after often from the very same writers, and others who are not just some random one but major writers in major books.
And 'biased writers' in your book seems to be "everyone who writes a WW vs SM fight." Or just "most of the writers who writes a WW fight against someone strong," because she performs well against most high-heralds and mid-heralds she's fought.
We've got a ton of major writers write her close to Superman and other high heralds, including in multiple events. Your counter-excuse? One writer who didn't actually write WW vs Superman but rather made a comparison of their powers, supposedly made a comment of bias in an article you can't produce and no-one else here has seen, and his supposed 'bias' passed editorial muster just fine. But Perez, Rucka, Jimenez, everyone else, you don't even have that.
It says a lot that you spend a lot of time attacking the writers, because the events themselves show plenty of high showings, and the only way you can get your conclusion is discrediting them.
If you had an argument, you wouldn't spend so much time relying on claiming that 1/10th of the writers involved are biased (probably not, but...), or relying on trying to say the bulk of the material of her conflicts against strong foes 'don't count.'
