Originally posted by CPT Space Bomb
Sigh,I said prequels. And it's no surprise that TPM made alot of money as it was the first Star Wars movie since ROTJ.
Kind of like TFA is the first Star Wars movie since ROTS. Hmm..
Originally posted by CPT Space Bomb
The hype surrounding it was nearly what TFA's was, if not more.
Well clearly not, because TPM didn't get the biggest opening weekend of all time. It was 2nd to Jurassic Park 2. Yet it thrashed Jurassic Park 2 at the box office, so clearly had much stronger legs.
Originally posted by CPT Space Bomb
I said prequels as a group, and I stand by that comment.
The only one of the Prequels which underperformed at the box office was AOTC (which is the only other Star Wars movie I was also underwhelmed by when I first saw it btw).
Originally posted by CPT Space Bomb
I'll say this, I fully expect EACH of the new trilogy films to outgain EACH of the PT films; and not just because inflation. HOLD ME TO IT, you can quote me on it.[/B]
That's a prediction, which doesn't mean anything for now. Most People were predicting Avengers AOU was going to surpass Avengers 1 but it didn't.
Also Remember this is the first SW film out in winter. Previously all SW films came out in Summer blockbuster season. So I wouldn't put my money on the ones released in Summer doing as well.
Anyway back to TPM, it was approximately as big a hit as Jurassic Park World Wide (even after both of them had a 3d re-release a few years ago, and even when you adjust for inflation domestically). So other movies doing better than it doesn't take anything away from how successful it was.
Originally posted by CPT Space Bomb
ROTS is EASILY the best prequel movie, and it didn't get "GREAT" reviews from either IMDB or Rotten Tomatoes. It failed to achieve an 8 on IMDB, and garned a 79% on Rotten Tomatoes. ALSO, perhaps more importantly, it only received a 65% approval from the audience rating on RT. And Metacritic is the harshest which gave it a 68%. Don't get me wrong, I liked ROTS, but it's not getting "Great" reviews, let's not pretend here.[/B]
Huh? 7.7 and 79% are not good scores? 68% is really good on Metacritic, because like you said it's the harshest!
Let me put ROTS scores in perspective for you. The 2nd biggest hit of this year "Jurassic World" which beat Avengers 1 for the no.3 box office spot of all time and was generally well received by critics and audiences alike.. has a 7.1 on Imdb and 71% on Rotten Tomatoes. So going by your own (Reviewers) measuring scale ROTS is a much better liked movie than Jurassic World.
Of course it wouldn't pass your "box office" test against Jurassic World, but $840mill ww in 2005 (with 10 years of inflation against it and 3d ticket sales and Imax) is not exactly anything to scoff at.
Originally posted by CPT Space Bomb
You aren't going to stop ripping TFA anyways, so what does that matter?
Just like some people will never stop attacking the Prequels, even AFTER Lucas has sold the franchise you mean?
Originally posted by CPT Space Bomb
And as far as Abrams? He's not directing the rest so you can at least be thankful for that perhaps.
I actually am very Thankful for that. I still want a new Star Wars movie that has some originality and imagination behind it.
Originally posted by CPT Space Bomb
I'm not the one hiding. I'm stating FACT. The only facts as of this moment, is that:
TFA is going to make more money and be better reviewed/received than any prequel, PERIOD. That's not opinion, IT'S FACT. If you don't like it, I can't help you with that.
And if you can't accept that as far as reviews go, art is subjective, and as far as box office goes, TPM was also a Massive Masssive hit, and ROTS also a pretty big one (which was also well received by your reviewer sites on top), then I can't help you either.
You don't talk for the "majority", you talk for yourself only, that's all I'm saying.