Q Continuum vs God

Started by Lestov1624 pages

Actually heaven and Sheol are part of the same "Heavens" dimension, whereas the physical universe exists in the "Earth dimension. Says in Genesis all reality is divided into ONLY the Heavens and the Earth. In the Star Trekverse, the Heavens dimension is the Q continuum, whereas the Earth dimension is the infinite MWI multiverse.

Originally posted by Robtard
WTF. It was just 5-6 pages ago you agreed God as the combined concept would be above all other fictional characters.

The film. The Q don't need to be downplayed one bit, as powerful as they are, they're not infinite, ergo they loose to the infinite being. If it makes you feel better, we can double the Q's power and call them QQ; they still loose though.

But after thinking about it, I realized that would put him above objective reality as well, and thinking that the fictional Morweh could somehow control us is insane. Thus the only logical way to judge is screenfeats.

There are levels to infinity, especially in regards to the numerous reality warpers in fiction. Q have control over a larger world. They are thus more powerful, and ergo win. You can't hide from the troof, Rob.

Originally posted by Lestov16
But after thinking about it, I realized that would put him above objective reality as well, and thinking that the fictional Morweh could somehow control us is insane. Thus the only logical way to judge is screenfeats.

So Morweh is above all fictional realities, even those with universal initial conditions that differ from the Bible, with beings who proclaim themselves omnipotent and showed power levels much higher than Morweh, but objective reality gets somehow excluded. Please explain this, since you claim to have a better comprehension of Robtard's "HE CONTROLZ EVERYTHANG!!" stance. Go on.

Originally posted by Lestov16
So Morweh is above all fictional realities, even those with universal initial conditions that differ from the Bible, with beings who proclaim themselves omnipotent and showed power levels much higher than Morweh, but objective reality gets somehow excluded. Please explain this, since you claim to have a better comprehension of Robtard's "HE CONTROLZ EVERYTHANG!!" stance. Go on.
Google perennial philosophy, panentheism, mysticism, or the Absolute, for starters.

Based on your previous posts, you seem to have difficulty grasping the concept of unconditional infinity (admittedly, it ain't easy). The Q are clearly not unconditionally infinite. They may be conditionally infinite in their power (eg, 1,2,3,4...), but they are not the Source+Ground+Content of All That Is+Was+Ever will be (imagine a sphere with an infinite radius, whose center is anywhere, and compare that to just a simple, infinite line).

The Q are entirely fictional. They exist in our reality purely as entertainment, whereas the fictionality/reality of God is debatable. That alone puts "God" above the Q. "God" has appeared in virtually every culture, over thousands of years, and has inspired billions of followers. If nothing else, God, even as a concept, has influenced our real world far more than the Q ever will. Indeed, the very idea of the Q, of "omnipotence," was no doubt inspired by the ages-old God concept, as was the screen presence of Morweh, Morisetteweh, GeorgeBurnsweh, etc, etc (so much for Thou Shalt Make No Graven Images).

Imho, there simply is no contest here. Never was, never will be. (And I remind you again that Time Immemorial, the thread maker, never said limit God's feats to onscreen, and indeed his posts embrace the concept of "God" Rob, dadudemon and I are talking about).

You seemed to grasp this for a moment. Far more impressive was you're willingness to entertain seeing (not necessarily agree with) the other side.

Bottom line: it's just a debate. We'll agree to disagree, and no hard feelings.

Originally posted by Mindship
whereas the fictionality/reality of God is debatable.

😆 The fictionality of the Biblical God Yahweh (on which MorganGod is based) is not debatable in the least. If Morweh presented himself as the avatar of the concept itself and not only Yahweh, if he had some dialogue in the film that indicated he was any more than the Biblical God, it would be a a different story. As it stands though, he only cited the Bible, not the Koran, not the The Vedas, only the bible, which brings one to the logical conclusion that he is only representing Yahweh, not the concept itself, in which based on biblical and screenfeats, Q is better.

but if you would like to agree to disagree, I got no problem with that. But I do not regard your argument as wrong, only a difference of interpretation, and you shouldn't regard mine as wrong either.

P.S. I never claimed to have a better comprehension than others, just a wordier one. 😉

P.S Wanted to add that I don't think it is impossible that Morweh is the avatar of the concept itself, just that due to Bruce Almighty citing only Biblical scripture and recreation of events from only the Bible, it seems more logical to me that he is an avatar of Yahweh rather than the entirety of the concept. Like I said, it is possible he was just posing as Yahweh to be easier understood, but dialogue from the film supports the stance that he actually is Yahweh Himself, IMO at least.

Also, I disagree with the fact that a fictional being who labels themself God is above all other fictional beings, because it is just subjective hyperbole which creates a paradox with all the fictional Gods out there. Is Morweh more powerful than Alanisweh, or Burnsweh, or TOAA? They can't all be the same power level, because that would defeat the purpose of omnipotence. They aren't the same being, because the worlds they exist in have sizes, contents, and different universal initial conditions. Morweh isn't above all of them, because it would defeat the other's omnipotence, not to mention there's no way to properly scale them. Thus the only way to determine the most powerful being is to look at the actual screenfeats, rather than Biblical hyperbole, and based on those screenfeats, the Q have shown a higher power level than Morweh.

Just wanted to add that as the Marvel Multiverse shows, there are levels to omnipotence, so just because a being says some hyperbole about being omnipotent doesn't mean they are to the superlative degree.

Originally posted by Lestov16
😆 The fictionality of the Biblical God Yahweh (on which MorganGod is based) is not debatable in the least. If Morweh presented himself as the avatar of the concept itself and not only Yahweh, if he had some dialogue in the film that indicated he was any more than the Biblical God, it would be a a different story. As it stands though, he only cited the Bible, not the Koran, not the The Vedas, only the bible, which brings one to the logical conclusion that he is only representing Yahweh, not the concept itself, in which based on biblical and screenfeats, Q is better.

These are good points but I was thinking that that version of God said as he said because Bruce had a Christian understanding of God so God was speaking to Bruce in the way he would best understand. You would assume that an all-knowing God would do that. 😄

Originally posted by Lestov16
Just wanted to add that as the Marvel Multiverse shows, there are levels to omnipotence, so just because a being says some hyperbole about being omnipotent doesn't mean they are to the superlative degree.

Touché

And that is a point I was making but lacked the ability to put properly into words.

Meh. You could interpret it that way, but the whole recreation of the flood just further leads me to believe he was only Yahweh and not the concept itself. It's all a matter of subjective interpretation at this point.

Indiddly-do

Guys....guys....

There's NO way I will support Morweh anymore in this thread. He has violated my wife:

YouTube video

Originally posted by dadudemon
So you're angry that you've been systematically destroyed and are now in repeat mode. 🙂 My job here is done.

Seriously, go back through your post and find a single new point you've made. It is literally not there. I read your post twice to be sure. I started to reply with just copying and pasting stuff I (and others) have already posted but it became too tedious. You're too far below me to deserve such attention. Like I said, level up. Move beyond your current style of posting and improve it. If you wish to be able to debate with me, you need to vastly improve. Stop getting hung up in your pettiness and focus on the points. Stop using strawman and red herring arguments. Tone down the insults or at least refocus the insults towards the points and not the person. Also, don't bring up past discussions: that's the first sign of immaturity and that you know you've lost/given up.

A good person would admit fault. A great poster would actually take the advice I have just given.


This is quite the glorified manner of penning down a "NO YOU!!!" response.
Originally posted by dadudemon

Actually, no, you're wrong here, too. There is proof it was an illusion: Picard's body and mind were in the real world. It was most likely just an elaborate illusion (brain in a vat).

So the episode mentioned during his journey in the alternate timeline that he wasn't physically present in that alternate timeline? Again, at the expense of getting another baseless claim without any substance to it, I ask what definitive proof you have of that scenario being an illusion?

Because as mentioned before, Piccard and crew faced another alien chick which a few members of the Enterprise at first speculated to be a rogue member of the Continuum, but whom Piccard quickly deduced was just glorified conwoman.

Originally posted by dadudemon

Do you realize how huge of an uphill battle you have to prove that it wasn't an illusion when you're directly contradicted by what was seen onscreen? The burden of proof is on you to prove it was a universe.

Actually I don't. Sorry bud, but relying on a negative-proof-fallacy is the first sign that you've thoroughly lost this debate. Not to mention the point with that alien conwoman has been already pointed out ad infinitum, which easily disproves this ridiculous lie which you and Robtard have trollishly failed to spread that every single feat of the Q is an elaborate illusion pulled off from an advanced holodeck.
Originally posted by dadudemon

lol, such narcissism. Sorry, bro, just not the case. If you can go back and read the thread, you had clearly posted and made a few points before I posted the stuff I did. Unrustle those jimmies. What's the matter, did I destroy you so definitively in the past that you have some PTSD so now you fear any conversation with me? 😄 😄 😄 😄

Wrong. You initially conceded that the Q have a better form of omnipotence, but then just randomly decided to flip-flop on your position once you realized that it was me who was arguing fervently against Morweh in this thread.

Not my first rodeo, pal. kinda

Originally posted by Lestov16
The Trekverse is an infinite multiverse which they have screenfeats controlling, due to creating and erasing timelines.
how is having power over the multiverse more impressive than creating the universe that started them all?

Originally posted by Lestov16
the Almightyverse wasn't shown to be even close to the size of the ST verse.
that's only because no one in "Bruce Almighty" altered time and created another reality.

How are you comfortable acknowledging the fact that God created the universe from nothing, then saying he couldn't also control something that derived from his creation?

that's like saying God created man, but because man created more men, god can't affect them.

As I stated before, we'll have to agree to disagree because we can not come to a mutual agreement of what Morweh actually is.

Originally posted by marwash22
how is having power over the multiverse more impressive than creating the universe that started them all?

Where was it mentioned that God started the Star-Trek verse? And this time please try to avoid bringing up that ridiculous Bible explanation of yours.

And there is no proof from the movie that God createc everything from nothing either.

All they have is subjective hyperbole.

Originally posted by Lestov16
As I stated before, we'll have to agree to disagree because we can not come to a mutual agreement of what Morweh actually is.
I'm not talking about philosophical matters... there's no debating that MorganGod created the universe tho, it's a fact.

Originally posted by Epicurus
Where was it mentioned that God started the Star-Trek verse? And this time please try to avoid bringing up that ridiculous Bible explanation of yours.
I'm not talking about Star Trek, I'm talking about what happened in "Bruce Almighty", God created the universe.

Originally posted by Epicurus
And there is no proof from the movie that God createc everything from nothing either.
the bible.

Originally posted by marwash22
I'm not talking about Star Trek, I'm talking about what happened in "Bruce Almighty", God created the universe.

So you have proof that his creation was a multiverse in the movie?
Originally posted by marwash22

the bible.

facepalm😂