How many out of 10 can Thor beat Superman in a slugfest?

Started by Delta193811 pages
Originally posted by Sin I AM
Like i said you created a thread to bait. Anyway this has been done before and im not inclined to post a thousand word essay on thors feats. You brought up qs scan which had no relevance to this match as a means to put down Thor. Then when i explained that Thor countered his speed then grabbed him before he could recover you said it's not relevant because he couldn't do this to superman. Anyway what is Clark gonna do if Thor spins mjolnir around at ftl speed while he's trying to blitz? Flight isn't available only super fast punches. Are u suggesting hes gonna punch thru that?

Making false accusations doesn't help your case. Just because you can't provide the evidence I wondered exists doesn't mean this was a bait thread.

Thor smashed the ground and pinned Pietro pretty much as soon as he hit the ground. Since A: Quicksilver can't fly unlike Superman, B: Superman is far stronger than Quicksilver and won't be so easily pinned, C: Superman is a lot faster than Quicksilver, and D: this is a modified slugfest so that tactic isn't allowed even if it were to work on Superman despite all those things working against Quicksilver that don't work against Superman, how is it anything but utterly invalid? The fact that he had to SMASH THE GROUND just to get him off balance speaks volumes of Thor's comparative lack of speed.

And considering this is a slugfest, I would think spinning Mjolnir around as opposed to striking with it wouldn't qualify as a valid tactic. Even if it did, you would have to provide evidence that Thor would be fast enough to pull this off before being beaten into submission by a flurry of super speed punches. Unless you think he could just do it even when getting his face smashed in faster and harder than Mongoose did? You saying I'm using low showings for Thor's combat speed but not providing anything but poorly arguing that the Quicksilver example is relevant is not providing evidence that I'm lowballing Thor's combat speed.

Fight One: Superman.

Fight Two: Thor.

Are they allowed to dodge and parry in these slugfests, or is this Rocky-esque block with your head fighting?

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Fight One: Superman.

Fight Two: Thor.

One: The topic is actually how many wins would Thor get out of 10, not who wins a majority/who wins. Two: What examples do you have that would have Thor overcome Superman's speed in scenario two?

Originally posted by MF DELPH
Are they allowed to dodge and parry in these slugfests, or is this Rocky-esque block with your head fighting?

They just stand there and punch each other until one goes down, no dodging, parrying or blocking. Normally speed isn't allowed in a slugfest, and I believe melee weapons as well as banned, but I'm modifying the slugfest rules for fight two to allow Thor Mjolnir and Superman to throw a barrage of punches at super speed.

Originally posted by Delta1938
Making false accusations doesn't help your case. Just because you can't provide the evidence I wondered exists doesn't mean this was a bait thread.

Thor smashed the ground and pinned Pietro pretty much as soon as he hit the ground. Since A: Quicksilver can't fly unlike Superman, B: Superman is far stronger than Quicksilver and won't be so easily pinned, C: Superman is a lot faster than Quicksilver, and D: this is a modified slugfest so that tactic isn't allowed even if it were to work on Superman despite all those things working against Quicksilver that don't work against Superman, how is it anything but utterly invalid? The fact that he had to SMASH THE GROUND just to get him off balance speaks volumes of Thor's comparative lack of speed.

And considering this is a slugfest, I would think spinning Mjolnir around as opposed to striking with it wouldn't qualify as a valid tactic. Even if it did, you would have to provide evidence that Thor would be fast enough to pull this off before being beaten into submission by a flurry of super speed punches. Unless you think he could just do it even when getting his face smashed in faster and harder than Mongoose did? You saying I'm using low showings for Thor's combat speed but not providing anything but poorly arguing that the Quicksilver example is relevant is not providing evidence that I'm lowballing Thor's combat speed.

What accusations are false? This IS a bait thread. I didn't bring up QS u did. Marvel does not depict their heralds moving a super speed in h2h . Not even the ones we KNOW have superspeed like Gladiator, Surfer, Hyperion etc. Hell DC doesn't even do it often enough outside the Flashes. Any scan i provide will just keep this shit storm of a thread going (like the trench digging feat, enchantress feat etc) . I just know that he's never had an issue dealing with herald levelers who have superspeed so it's warranted IMO that's its a non factor. Mongoose, QS, Wolverine doing anything other than annoying him is absurd whe he's caught Zephyr and Hermes who are legit speedsters is ludicrous.

i'd take clark for a solid majority in the first, say 7-8/10. the second would be a lot closer. i'd say a split. supes tends to NOT hit as hard when he's throwing superspeed punches. a solid hammer shot could stagger him to give thor the win, if he can handle getting hit a 100 times to land one.....

so let me ask again...magic weakness not a factor here?

no more a factor than captain marvel's fist hitting superman imo. or wonder woman's maybe. if thor isn't charging the hammer at all i don't see it's striking power being much more of an issue than those others. besides, supes has many very strong showings against magic anyway....enough imo to think that a regular hammer strike wouldn't possess enough inherent magic to be of particular threat here.

Originally posted by Delta1938
Based on?

Comics

Originally posted by leonidas
no more a factor than captain marvel's fist hitting superman imo. or wonder woman's maybe. if thor isn't charging the hammer at all i don't see it's striking power being much more of an issue than those others. besides, supes has many very strong showings against magic anyway....enough imo to think that a regular hammer strike wouldn't possess enough inherent magic to be of particular threat here.

cool...I was thinking a magic thunder imbued hammer strike

Originally posted by Warlord
so let me ask again...magic VULNERABILITY not a factor here?

Fixed

And as mentioned by Leo is as much factor as all the other magic he has faced before.

But based on how Thor TENDS to end up after a flurry of NON-Superman level punches thrown at Super-speed, I believe the speed is more of a factor than magic vulnerability.

IMO anyway

Originally posted by Warlord
cool...I was thinking a magic thunder imbued hammer strike

if he can charge the hammer, it would certainly have more of an impact, like the charged sucker punch from marvel. i was under the impression it was just straight slugging with the hammer and no use of powers from it. if he can charge it, i would give thor a slight edge, 6/10.

Originally posted by Sin I AM
What accusations are false? This IS a bait thread. I didn't bring up QS u did. Marvel does not depict their heralds moving a super speed in h2h . Not even the ones we KNOW have superspeed like Gladiator, Surfer, Hyperion etc. Hell DC doesn't even do it often enough outside the Flashes. Any scan i provide will just keep this shit storm of a thread going (like the trench digging feat, enchantress feat etc) . I just know that he's never had an issue dealing with herald levelers who have superspeed so it's warranted IMO that's its a non factor. Mongoose, QS, Wolverine doing anything other than annoying him is absurd whe he's caught Zephyr and Hermes who are legit speedsters is ludicrous.

You have absolutely nothing but your unsubstantiated opinion that it's a bait thread. I gave my reasons for making that scenario, wondering if there's examples that Thor could actually reasonably keep-up with Superman. You've provided nothing, just accused me of making bait threads, defending an example that doesn't hold water, and claiming I'm lowballing Thor 'cuz you disagree.

Yeah, I brought up the Quicksilver fight. But you defended it. Are you saying you bothered arguing it just 'cuz, or do you think it's an example that Thor can reasonably keep-up with Superman? The way you defended it is kinda like arguing, say, early Quasar can hold his own in a pure hand-to-hand fight against Doomsday because he took-out Thing with an energy blast.

So accusing me of making a bait thread and calling it a "shitstorm" and you're still here? If it really bothers you so much, why are you here? Anyways, you're arguing that just because Thor fights opponents with combat super speed means he can keep-up with them, even if they don't show super speed because we know they do? Didn't you previously argue that Superman doesn't always speed-blitz? But are you now arguing that Thor fights others at super speed because they have it? If that is the case, that's completely hypocritical. I don't argue Metallo, Mongul, Equs, ect have combat speed just because they fight Superman.

And Thor digging that trench and catching Hermes are good speed feats for Thor, but not good enough to argue keeping-up with Superman speed-blitzing. The trench example had him digging "almost faster than the eye can see." Gross motor movement that still wasn't too fast for the eye to see. Catching Hermes did show some superhuman perception speed, but the actual catching was more a travel speed feat, not too useful for arguing Thor's combat speed. And not only did Thor not fight at super speed against Hephaestus after, but Hermes was shown after only moving ALMOST too fast for normal eyes to see, even if Hephaestus' sneak attack hindered Thor's fighting speed.

http://s1199.photobucket.com/user/Delta1938/library/Alternates/Miscellaneous/Speed/Hermes

Compare that to Superman who has done more complex tasks requiring fine motor skill and doing it too fast for the eye to see, and it's not the best argument.

http://s1199.photobucket.com/user/Delta1938/library/Superman%20speed/Speed%20Blitzes%20And%20Equivalents/Speedblitz%20Equivalents/Batman_is_helpless

http://i1199.photobucket.com/albums/aa466/Delta1938/Superman%20speed/Speed%20Blitzes%20And%20Equivalents/Speedblitz%20Equivalents/Miscellaneous/AOS0-PG03.jpg

http://i1199.photobucket.com/albums/aa466/Delta1938/Superman%20speed/Speed%20Blitzes%20And%20Equivalents/Speedblitz%20Equivalents/Miscellaneous/AOS543-PG17.jpg

http://i1199.photobucket.com/albums/aa466/Delta1938/Superman%20speed/Speed%20Blitzes%20And%20Equivalents/Speedblitz%20Equivalents/Miscellaneous/SUPERMANANNUAL13-PG15.jpg

And these aren't even Superman's best. I'm not familiar with the Enchantress example, but if he Zephyr example is what I'm thinking, not bad for Thor, but also not something that doesn't translate well as an exam for Thor's combat speed. Hell, I believe Hal Jordan had a similar but more impressive example of catching Flash, but you don't see me arguing Hal blitzes Thor.

Basically, you're arguing your opinion, which you're not adequately backing. You thinking Mongoose, Quicksilver and Wolverine being faster in combat speed than Thor is absurd because of a couple non-combat speed showings ain't gonna cut it. Nor is arguing Thor fighting at super speed against Gladiator, Hyperion or Surfer(who's combat speed seems overrated, but that's another topic) 'cuz they have it. If that is what you were arguing.

Do you have better speed showings for Thor? If so, show them. If not, I'd appreciate you not accusing me of baiting, then complaining that I'm pointing-out your examples aren't up to par when they legitimately aren't.

Originally posted by Warlord
so let me ask again...magic weakness not a factor here?

It's not a weakness. Typical strikes won't hurt any more than equivalently non-mystical physical strikes. Considering many feats Superman has against magick, even charged strikes could be the same and just hit harder, not disproportionately effect him.

Originally posted by celeyhyga17
Comics

Care to elaborate?

Originally posted by leonidas
if he can charge the hammer, it would certainly have more of an impact, like the charged sucker punch from marvel. i was under the impression it was just straight slugging with the hammer and no use of powers from it. if he can charge it, i would give thor a slight edge, 6/10.

I didn't say charged strikes were disallowed, but I don't believe Thor uses them often, so me, I figure he only uses them in a few of the fights in scenario 2. I made the second scenario more to see if the Thor side could provide better speed feats than I've seen, and examples that standard Mjolnir strikes hit particularly harder than Thor's punches.

Also, it actually took two Zeus amped punches from Captain Marvel, the first being a sucker punch. And Cap still hurt his hand.

Originally posted by Delta1938
I.....I seriously hope you're joking.

Captain America compared Masterson Thor to Thor in speed the issue prior to Spidey blitzing him. Seems like it's a valid example, but it's not even imporant.

Thor slammed the ground with Mjolnir knocking Pietro off balance. That tactic wouldn't work against a speed-blitzing Superman even ignoring that this is a slugfest, so Thor can't do that. If Thor couldn't tag Quicksilver, who is slower and can't hurt Thor like Superman can, then how is that fight relevant when Thor can't use the only thing that allowed him to beat Quicksilver if we pretend it would be useful against Superman?

And they're low showings? Prove it. The Quicksilver example is obviously irrelevant for your case considering what actually happens and just supports my point. What is there for you to argue Gladiator or Mongoose being too fast for him(effectively too fast with alt Gladiator's case) to really deal with well? I could maybe buy Wolverine, but that's not even assured.

In regards to conventional striking, it doesn't seem to be a major factor in the Thor/Hercules fights I've seen. Charged strikes? That's a different argument.

Fight one is a standard slugfest, no Mjolnir for Thor. Fight two Thor gets Mjolnir to hit with, but Superman can punch at super speed.

No, I get that. Actually, nvm, I had misunderstood something else. Now I see that Superman can't block or parry.

Superman in the first, Thor in the second.

Originally posted by Bentley
Like the often cited night battle you use for Prime. Context goes both ways 😱

Which arc are you referring to?

Prime was not mentioned to be weakened at all in that story and on top of that he had his special armor on as well.

Grog in the Seth arc and I believe the arc when his body was cursed by Hela.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Yeah, that's a huge testament to his pain tolerance. And unlike Thor who was running away from Absorbing Man like a coward that he is when his bones were cursed, Superman fought Preus and then 300 Gogs at the same time for an extended time and was able to endure kryptonite for hundreds of years.
Do you really want to start this game because I can definitely be your huckleberry.

Originally posted by Rao Kal El
Lol, no

Even Quani accepts Superman is stronger.

Imo you are dead wrong on this one

It doesn't matter what I accept and what I don't accept as opinions vary.

Originally posted by -Pr-
No, I get that. Actually, nvm, I had misunderstood something else. Now I see that Superman can't block or parry.

Superman in the first, Thor in the second.

So why do you think Mjolnir outweighs Superman's speed in scenario two?

Originally posted by Delta1938

Captain America compared Masterson Thor to Thor in speed the issue prior to Spidey blitzing him. Seems like it's a valid example, but it's not even imporant.

Lol.

Almost missed this.

Where did he do this?

Actually, here's Thor in the same training session:

Yea, if these scenes prove anything, it's that Masterson and Thor are comparable in regards to battle competency and reflexes. 😂