KMC Star Wars Community Tier effort

Started by McP35 pages

Too many characters at once. Let's make that simple:

Angelalex242 voted for Luke and Sidious as Tier 10 duelists.

I won't vote for Luke.
I vote for Sidious to be Tier 9 along with Yoda.

What do you think about Sidious/Yoda/Luke placement Ant?

Originally posted by ILS
I think the general understanding is that Luke needs to be in tier 10 otherwise it would be vacant, and moving anyone else up to tier 10 would destroy the structure of the rankings, because part of what the tier is based on is Yoda, Sidious, Windu and Anakin being tier 9s as duelists, as per Gillard.

Whoever said a tier 10 was needed?

Originally posted by NewGuy01
Whoever said a tier 10 was needed?
I don't think it really matters either way. Luke's just a special case because he's kind of, the best. Having nine tiers instead of ten seems ugly.

@NewGuy01
So are you voting for Luke and Sidious to be Tier 9 duelists?

No. Luke is definitely a Tier above the likes of Yoda or Mace or even Caedus. Caedus holding him off isn't the same as Caedus having a reasonable chance of winning.

In general, anyone can stall a duelist only 1 tier better.

Not really. One just needs to look at their comparative showings against Katarn and Gaalan respectively to see how comparable their skills are, their own battle against one another pretty nicely solidifies the idea.

In terms of lightsaber ability, Caedus and Luke are definitely on the same tier. Luke consistently one-ups him via superior power in the Force, though.

And as Caedus vs. Yoda is a dead draw, if Caedus ranks 10, Yoda will too.

For one thing, you keep calling Yoda vs Caedus a dead draw as if it were set in stone, it's not. Secondly, I'd vote for them all being 9, not those 3 being 10.

^
So do I.

It was the result of my thread, at least. What else have I to judge by?

But Luke is still a solid 10.

no

Okay. Let's turn it around. What proof do you have that he's NOT a 10?

The guy acclaimed to be the best Jedi Ever, who achieved what his father should've been...what evidence have you got against his being a 10?

No source states he is the most powerful Jedi ever, actually.

Asking someone to prove a negative is what's known as a logical fallacy, my friend. He's done nothing that puts him above the other 9's as a duelist, and that's all the proof we need.

Lucas says he's all Anakin is supposed to be. And what was Anakin supposed to be, again?

I know you're aware of that quote.

Anyways, what he's got for ranking 10 is taking out dozens of Sith by himself. And the 'wielding 1000 lightsabers' stunt

Except we see that in the EU, Luke was never depicted that way. Abeloth was far more powerful then him.

Dozens of Sith is something ****ing Surik has done, no ones putting her in even tier 8, and even I don't think that's actually a feat worthy of the top tiers.

Satele Shan took down 4-5 in less than a few seconds, but no ones put her in that tier because fodder Sith are fodder.

No. Lucas never, ever said that. He said Luke could become that. Just like Jacen, or Leia could become that.

Also, what Selenial said. Even plebs like Meetra can do that. 🤣

Aboleth is a Tier 11 being. Luke not being able to solo her isn't anything against him.

Luke outduels DE Palpatine and he continues to improve from there. Considering that DE Palpatine is more powerful than his lvl 9 RotS self, I fail to see how Luke is not a 10...