FreshestSlice
Eternal Commander
Originally posted by Col. Valerian
The logic has been provided by myself, by Joker and by Gideon.
"Vader still serves Sidious" is not an argument towards Sidious being more powerful than Vader. Nor is "Sidious defeated Maul and Savage, and I don't think Mace actually won." You saying, "The PT is about how great Sidious and Yoda are," is also by far the most nonsensical thing said so far.
Sure, it might be 'canon', but it doesn't make sense. Why didn't Vader challenge Sidious in those 20 years?
Because he needs an apprentice lined up and Sidious keeps killing them all when they get Ventress level?
Why was Sidious, in the PT, portrayed as the most powerful and someone only Yoda or Mace could compete against?
Was never said by anyone ever. The closest is, "You need to be a 9 to challenge Sidious," which is something Anakin is.
On the other hand, someone who's 'the most powerful of all Jedi and Sith', as you say, was given a good fight by Ahsoka, whom on the other hand had a brief but pretty much even duel against Rebels Maul.
Who is no match for Vader by his own words, so that's not even a point in your favor. Not to mention Sidious being challenged by the likes of a weakened Talzin. Ahsoka also had plenty of things in her favor such as knowing Vader's combat style, which is something the writer said she would have, more agility from not being a robot, and Vader's own emotional conflict in her favor. Being more technically powerful doesn't mean you can obliterate everyone who's weaker than you. That's never been true.