Originally posted by Kotor3I never said it was to that point. I did not say beat in a fight I said hurt. Pay attention to what I say. You're all over the place. I always said two big advantages for Michael were strength and speed.
I did watch the fight many times. So you agree it wasn’t to the point in which Viktor could not harm him. Good. Another bad example. A ten year old cannot hurt a 20 year old in a straight up face to face or head to head battle on equal terms. The ten year would have to sneak attack the 20 year old.Viktor confronted and face Michael head on, face to face. Your nitpicking for Viktor is most disturbing.
Yes Viktor took the tactic of having his men shoot Michael so as to weaken him. Let us not forget it was Viktor who just knock Michael a couple of feet away. Are you sure you saw the movie?
As for your emotional comment, LOL. If you would stick to the facts then the discussion would have been over a long time ago.
Viktor wanted him put down at all costs. The bullets failed to significantly injure him. You can pretend they did.
I am sticking to the facts and you want to ignore them because you claim they are stupid hence being biased. I don't try to hide from the evidence whereas you do.