Originally posted by Robtard
Ffs, Dom, just get on your cell phone. But here you go:"N*****s are stupid and violent. At the same time they have the capacity to be very slick."
My personal cell is at home. No, I am not kidding. I have had quite the busy work week and weekend.
And it wasn't hard, at all, for Bardock42 to just post the single quote. He was just trolling me. The conversation could have been over in 2 posts.
*Dominic asks*
*Marius provides*
*Dominic posts "ha, that's one racist f*ck"*
*All agree and move on*
Originally posted by Bardock42
Part I posted was relevant to what I compared it to. The link is there for people who are interested in other parts. Additionally the part I posted is clearly racist to me, I don't feel like someone needs to outright say the n-word to betray their racism.
The part you posted wasn't racist.
Originally posted by Bardock42
Part I posted was relevant to what I compared it to. The link is there for people who are interested in other parts. Additionally the part I posted is clearly racist to me, I don't feel like someone needs to outright say the n-word to betray their racism.
Why do you think the part you quoted was racist?
I covered why it is not, superficially, racist, but you dodged. You did not offer your opinion on why it was racist. Sup?
I think deflecting the racism inherent in the US by citing cross-racial murders is disingenuous and racist. I believe claiming that the media puts undue focus on cases like the one of Trayvon Martin and none to murders of white people by black people fundamentally distorts why cases like Trayvon Martin's make the news and have people outraged, and it is, again, racist. It's racism that's "acceptable" in society, but it comes from the same place and it aids the more obvious, more condemned racism (like the part that Robtard posted).
Originally posted by dadudemon
My personal cell is at home. No, I am not kidding. I have had quite the busy work week and weekend.And it wasn't hard, at all, for Bardock42 to just post the single quote. He was just trolling me. The conversation could have been over in 2 posts.
*Dominic asks*
*Marius provides*
*Dominic posts "ha, that's one racist f*ck"*
*All agree and move on*
I personally found the quote B42 posted to be racist, sure, not racist 10 like the quote I posted, but still racist, like racist 6.8.
Originally posted by Bardock42
I think deflecting the racism inherent in the US by citing cross-racial murders is disingenuous and racist. I believe claiming that the media puts undue focus on cases like the one of Trayvon Martin and none to murders of white people by black people fundamentally distorts why cases like Trayvon Martin's make the news and have people outraged, and it is, again, racist. It's racism that's "acceptable" in society, but it comes from the same place and it aids the more obvious, more condemned racism (like the part that Robtard posted).
It deflects and distorts precisely jack shit. The media focuses on cases like that because of the outrage and the brouhaha it causes. And that means ratings/clicks.
Originally posted by ArtificialGlory
It deflects and distorts precisely jack shit. The media focuses on cases like that because of the outrage and the brouhaha it causes. And that means ratings/clicks.
That's what I'm saying. The media reports it because there is an immense amount of outrage, and there is an immense amount of outrage because these are not normal cases of murder, but killings that fit into a pattern of racism that is structurally supported.
Murders of white people by black people, are tragedies, but they are dealt with by authorites and virtually no one condones them, unlike the racist, conservative media machine that springs into action to attack and condemn the victims of racist police or otherwise racist shootings.
To disgregard that, and deflect from that, is ****ing racist. That you guys for some reason are trying to make this out to be just a harmless things anyone could say with no racial bias, parcitular in the face that it was contained within a racist manifesto by someone who massacred peaceful black people at a place of worship is absurd and just shows how this kind of racism is excused and accepted.
Yes, I'm calling you and dadudemon and vansonbee racists. Because you are racists. Be better!
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
all this time i thought that citing an obviously biased source which supports white nationalism and white separatism would be 10/10 racist.consider me schooled
Even so, 2+2=4 doesn't become any less correct even when stated by the whitest nationalist or the whitest of separatists.
Consider it so.
Originally posted by Robtard
Assuming that was towards me, I've never been to the "Council of Conservative Citizens" website.
research their history/founding and all will become clear.
thats the new trend. adopt innocuous names to blend in with the other conservative media outlets and activist groups.
Originally posted by Bardock42
I think deflecting the racism inherent in the US by citing cross-racial murders is disingenuous and racist.
Why?
Black on white murders is one of the most contrasting murder stats out there. No other crimes, by race, have such a stark contrast, other than black on black murders. So why would it be disingenuous? Why is it racist?
There are poorer (slightly) and less educated demographics in America and they don't murder white people nearly as often. This means you cannot blame it just on SES, alone, as many shortsighted and ignorant SJWs/US Liberals do.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1781361/
As I argued with another, your opinion is actually the racist one. It is subtle. It is a modern trend. And it is racist. By pretending there is not an issue and also coddling the African American community (because you feel they need tons of your TLC), you're actually being racist. Also, I feel that maybe my opinion, here, of you, is not fully justified and I am jumping the gun so forgive me if I have not characterized your position correctly and lumped you in with people that you don't deserve to be grouped with.
Originally posted by Bardock42
I believe claiming that the media puts undue focus on cases like the one of Trayvon Martin
Not to cut off your thought mid sentence, but we actually strongly agree, here. I really think this case was very overblown and it should not have gotten the attention it did. It just exacerbated existing racial tensions, imo.
Originally posted by Bardock42
and none to murders of white people by black people fundamentally distorts why cases like Trayvon Martin's make the news and have people outraged, and it is, again, racist.
I'm 50-50 with you, here. Either that or I am misinterpreting and I actually agree 100%. I think the whole news coverage of the Zimmerman case was racist. Them making it into a big deal when it should not have which, imo, is racist in and of itself. Making things a huge national race issue when it shouldn't be is subtle racism. I don't know how to describe that but it seems the people involved that made that media-hype machine are passively racist. Is that what you're also saying? If not, let me know where I messed up my understanding.
Here is the other interpretation of your words that made me say the 50-50:
The fact that a very disproportionate number of white people are killed by black people is irrelevant to the racist (racist against black people) issue that came up because of the Trayvon Martin killing. If that is what you meant, I disagree, somewhat. I think the Trayvon Martin case should have remained a local news story, at best, and the issue of black on white homicide is still an issue that needs to be addressed but not in the same "breath", as it were.
Originally posted by Bardock42
It's racism that's "acceptable" in society, but it comes from the same place and it aids the more obvious, more condemned racism (like the part that Robtard posted).
I really lose you, here. I just don't understand what you mean even if I add in Robtard's post.
In your above post, define what "it" refers to. I think you're talking about the disproportionate black on white homicide.
In which case, I disagree. If the reverse were true, SJW liberals would, rightfully so, use that statistic to support their case and their causes. Since it is not in their favor, people, like you, say it is racist to focus on it being a race-problem. It doesn't support your positional narrative. I understand that having that data floating around is very shitty for your beliefs.
But why pretend it is not a problem? Why say it is racist to point it as a race problem?
Perhaps I am missing the boat, hugely, and we actually agree. I feel like I am. Maaaaan, I don't know.
To be clear, I think Zimmerman is racist. And I think white supremacists who use homicide statistics to justify their racism against black people are pieces of shit. I don't think we disagree on our fundamental positions.